The Climate Change Resource Center Review Process

To ensure the quality and scientific credibility of the information provided on the Climate Change Resource Center website, the production team uses a tiered review process.  For minor to moderate changes of site content (e.g., addition or deletion of a single resource or tool), review is conducted internally by the production team. Content is reviewed for both technical merit and appropriateness from a policy perspective. In determining whether content is acceptable, the production team considers whether the material has been previously published and peer-reviewed, and the credibility of the information source.

Peer-review of original scientific content

For more substantial changes in site content, including addition of any original (not previously published) content such as topic pages, the science editor administers an external double-blind peer-review, followed by a production team editorial review.  Peer-review is conducted by at least two scientists, at least one from outside of the Forest Service.  Reviewers are given information on what the expectations are for the content and the review.  Authors must respond to each reviewer comment and revise the content accordingly.  Failure to adequately address reviewer comments leads to another revision or omission of the material from the CCRC.  Final decisions regarding publication of content on the website rest with the CCRC co-chairs.  The entire external peer-review process is documented in detail.

For more information, please contact us at


Was this page helpful?

Please help us improve the CCRC by giving us feedback.