Hemlock Canker

Hemlock Canker

Caused by an unknown fungus

Host(s) in Alaska:

western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla
mountain hemlock (Tsuga mertensiana); susceptible but rarely affected

Habitat(s): tree branches and boles

Current Status & Distribution in Alaska (2023 Update)

There has been negligible damage from helmock canker in recent years and no damage from this disease was recorded in 2023. A significant hemlock canker outbreak occurred throughout Southeast Alaska from 2012-2016, with the most substantial damage mapped through roadside surveys on Prince of Wales Island (see Map). Hemlock canker causes synchronized tree and lower branch mortality along forest edges and can only be aerially mapped when it occurs along coastlines. Recent outbreaks have persisted longer and been noted farther north (Juneau and Cordova) and farther from roads than past reported outbreaks.

From 2014 to 2019, live tree inoculation trials were conducted in collaboration with Dr. Gerard Adams at the University of Nebraska to determine the causal fungus. In June 2018, more than 500 live hemlock saplings were inoculated with 12 fungal isolates and a control treatment near Juneau. Lesion development was measured in 2019 and several top pathogens caused consistently larger lesion development than the control treatment. The pathogen that caused the largest lesions was Pezicula livida (or a closely related species), followed by Allantophomopsis tsugae, Discocainea treleasei, Chalara sp., Dermea sp. and Caliciopsis sp. Identification of our Pezicula and Dermea isolates to species will require DNA sequencing of at least four different genes and may yet remain as unnamed species (not previously collected and molecularly identified).

Symptoms, Biology & Impacts

Young western hemlock trees killed by hemlock canker.
Peeling away the bark reveals the margin between
healthy tissue and dark, dead canker tissue.

Hemlock canker causes synchronized mortality of small and medium western hemlock trees and lower branches of large trees. Diseased mountain hemlock have rarely been observed in severely affected forests dominated by western hemlock. Symptoms include bark lesions, bleeding or resinous cankers, and branch or small tree mortality; the disease usually does not kill large trees greater than 14 inches in diameter. Disease behavior suggests it is an aggressive, annual canker, rapidly expanding in host tissue during one or two growing seasons to girdle branches and tree boles. This disease is most often seen along roads and natural openings (along creeks and shorelines), with most symptomatic trees within 100-300ft of roads or openings. The microclimate in openings probably contributes to disease spread or development. Road dust was thought to be a predisposing factor in the 1990s, but outbreaks continued to occur along gravel roads that were subsequently paved. Resistant tree species (spruce and cedars) may benefit from reduced competition in affected stands, and wildlife habitat may be enhanced where hemlock mortality promotes increased herbaceous vegetation in the understory. In some cases, hemlock canker has extended far from roads into thinned young-growth stands killing intended crop trees, but normally disease does not have a large impact on timber production or forest management.

Historic Activity

Hemlock canker outbreaks have been documented one to two times per decade on Prince of Wales, Kosciusko, Kuiu, and Chichagof Islands in southeast Alaska. In the early-1990s, a theory emerged that road dust might contribute to disease development. Dust was observed to reach approximately the same maximum height in the tree crown (about 40-50 feet) as the disease symptoms. However, disease has continued to occur along roads upgraded from gravel to pavement, and in forests far from roads. In the 1980s and 1990s the causal pathogen was tentatively identified as Xenomeris abietis, but this was never confirmed through inoculation trials.

Source: Forest Health Conditions in Alaska reports (1969-2012)

  • The first reported hemlock canker outbreak occurred on Prince of Wales Island in 1973 with an estimated extent of 3000 acres. This outbreak was closely followed by severe disease near Edna Bay on Kosciusko Island in 1974 and 1975, concentrated along logging roads and in young-growth stands harvested in the 1940s. In 1977, disease occurred on Prince of Wales Island from Thorne Bay to Control Lake.
  • Another outbreak occurred on Prince of Wales and Mitkof Islands 1985-1986, mapped along more than 35 miles of roadside forest.
  • The next flare-up on Prince of Wales Island began in 1990; by 1992, this outbreak had been mapped across more than 60 miles of roadside forest, and new outbreaks were reported near Rowan Bay on Kuiu Island, Corner Bay on Chichagof Island, and Carroll Inlet on Revilla Island, finally subsiding around 1994.
  • In 1998-1999 hemlock canker was observed in several roadless areas, and was again common on the Rowan Bay road system on Kuiu Island and the western arm of Cholmondeley Sound on Prince of Wales Island. In 2001, several small hemlock canker flare-ups were noted and mapped along roadsides and shoreline areas of central Prince of Wales (Cholmondeley Sound) and Etolin Islands. This outbreak continued to build in 2002, affecting some areas far from roads, and also causing mortality of second-growth crop trees in thinned timber stands near Polk Inlet. This outbreak diminished and there was a lull in hemlock canker activity until 2012.

The outbreak that began in 2012 prompted renewed study of this disease because the causal agent had never been conclusively identified. In 2012 and 2013, cankered branches were collected and sent to Gerry Adams at the University of Nebraska for fungal isolation and genetic sequencing. Several potential canker pathogens were identified from these samples. Inoculation trials were conducted with these fungi in spring 2013 and 2014 to determine if any cause hemlock canker disease of western hemlock in Alaska. Of trees inoculated in 2013 and 2014, Discocainia treleasei, Pezicula livida, and Collophora hispanica were the fungi that generally caused the largest lesions to develop at inoculation sites on tree boles. Discocainia treleasei was also used to inoculate freshly-cut hemlock logs in Juneau in 2015, resulting in consistently better lesion development than the control treatment. In 2016, new methods were used to preserve and genetically sequence fresh samples obtained in Sitka and Juneau. Material was cultured directly in the field and also preserved on Whatman FTA cards, designed to preserve genetic material and reduce contamination. Illumina sequencing, a very sensitive genetic sequencing approach, is being used to identify all fungal organisms present in the FTA card-preserved samples. This work is continuing, and potential causal pathogens identified through these advanced methods will be used in seedling inoculation trials in 2018.

Return to top

Survey Method 

Our knowledge of hemlock canker primarily comes from informal field detection followed by roadside surveys to assess disease extent and impacts (e.g., miles of roadside forest affected, distance symptoms extend from roads, sizes of trees killed, age structure of forest affected). When present along shorelines, this disease can be seen from the air; however, mapped extent is considered a significant underestimate because small tree mortality and lower crown symptoms are seldom visible from above.

Detection Maps 

Hemlock canker detection locations during the most recent outbreak.
Locations of the most recent hemlock canker outbreak in Southeast Alaska













Links to Resources & Publications

Hennon, P. E. 1987. Hemlock canker on Prince of Wales Island. March 1987. Biological Evaluation R-10-87-3. 7 p. Scanned document converted to accessible pdf available here

Hennon, P. E. 1992. Third reported outbreak of hemlock canker along roads of Prince of Wales Island. March 1992. Biological Evaluation R-10-TP-25. 9 p. Scanned document converted to accessible pdf available here.

Content prepared by Robin Mulvey, Forest Health Protection, robin.mulvey@usda.gov.

Contact us    Forest Health Protection Homepage