Wilderness Recommendation Process
As part of forest plan revision under the 2012 planning rule, forests are required to identify lands that may or may not be suitable to recommend to Congress for new Wilderness designation as part of the revision of their land and resource management plan (Forest Plan). Recommended wilderness is distinct from designated wilderness, and is managed in accordance with Forest Plan direction as opposed to the Wilderness Act of 1964. The important thing to remember is that congress has reserved the authority to make final decisions on wilderness designation. Further information on the Wilderness Recommendation Process can be found in Chapter 70 of the Land Management Planning Handbook.
The Forest Supervisor Neil Bosworth signed the Record of Decision for the revised Tonto National Forest Land Management Plan (land management plan) on December 8, 2023. The Record of Decision documents the rationale for approving the land management plan. This revised plan will replace the existing 1985 land management plan (1985 forest plan) effective 30 days from December 8, 2023. The Record of Decision includes the final Recommended Wilderness Areas. For maps and acreages of these final areas see the plan project page.
Steps of the Wilderness Process
The process occurs in four primary steps: Inventory, Evaluation, Analysis, and Recommendation. Currently, the Tonto National Forest is in the Analysis Step. More information on these steps can be found on the Wilderness Recommendation Process Story Map.
Step 1: Inventory
The purpose of the inventory steps is to identify and create an inventory of all lands that may or may not be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System using a given set of criteria.
- Final Inventory Criteria (August 2017)
- Final Inventory Map (October 2017)
View our Inventory informational video about the inventory map. Inventory Process video script.
Step 2: Evaluation
Evaluate the wilderness characteristics of all lands included in the inventory that may be suitable for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System using a given set of criteria and assign a ranking of high, moderate, low, or no for their wilderness character.
- Final Evaluation Process Documentation (May 2018)
- Final Evaluation Map (May 2018)
- Final Evaluation Rationale (May 2018)
Excel document available by request to tontoplan@fs.fed.us
View our Evaluation informational video about the evaluation step. Evaluation Process video script.
Step 3: Analysis
Based on the evaluation and input from the public, some areas, or portions thereof, may be proposed as part of the Draft Forest Plan, or an alternative and analyzed through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis as part of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
- Draft Analysis Criteria (May 2018)
- Final Analysis was completed in Appendix D of Final Environmental Impact Statement Volume 4.
Step 4: Recommendation
As part of the Draft Record of Decision (2022) the areas being recommended for inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System include:
- Gun Creek Recommended Wilderness Area (Analysis Polygon 101a) – Pleasant Valley Ranger District – 23,462 acres
- Boulder Recommended Wilderness Area (Analysis Polygon 76) – Tonto Basin Ranger District – 61,611 acres
- Coronado Mesa Recommended Wilderness Area (Analysis Polygon 32) – Mesa Ranger District – 6,419 acres
- Red Creek Recommended Wilderness Area (Analysis Polygon 119d) – Cave Creek Ranger District - 11,387 acres
- Mullen Mesa Recommended Wilderness Area (Analysis Polygon 119b) – Cave Creek Ranger District - 3,562 acres
The areas being recommended are manageable, currently have few to no uses inconsistent with wilderness designation, and would truly add value if they were designated wilderness through a congressional decision in the future. The acres being recommended represent high-quality areas that can maintain the unique social and ecological characteristics that make them eligible for wilderness designation while minimizing the effects to those concerned with the inherent tradeoffs that come with managing these areas to maintain their wilderness characteristics.
- For a map of the areas being recommended please refer to the Wilderness Recommendation Process Story Map.
Archived Information
Documentation
- Evaluation Criteria (January 2018)
- Draft Evaluation Rationale (January 2018)
- Evaluation Criteria (October 2017)
- Expanded Evaluation Criteria (September 2017)
- Draft Inventory Criteria (July 2017)
- Draft Evaluation Criteria (July 2017)
- Preliminary Inventory Criteria (June 2017)
- Preliminary Evaluation Criteria (June 2017)
- Recommended Wilderness Process Storymap (July 2022)
Maps
- Draft Inventory Map (September 2017)
- Draft Evaluation Map (January 2018)
Data
- Draft Evaluation GIS Data (January 2018)
- Wilderness Draft Inventory GIS Data (September 2017)