Indicator – L11. Diversity of forest use at the community level
Consultant's Initials: |
GSA |
Source: |
CCFM |
Identification No. in source: Use all refs: |
6.3.3 |
Class: |
Economic |
Recommendation (after field testing) Yes or no |
No |
Revised Indicator Suggested? # |
Box A:
Principle - Society accepts responsibility for sustainability.
Criterion- There is equitable access to and distribution of economic rents.
Indicator - Diversity of forest use at the community level.
Box B: Definition:
The source document (CCFM, 1996) does not define this indicator. From the description, the intent or meaning is not obvious.
Box C: Attributes
Rated on a scale of 1-5, where 1=no/bad/unimportant and 5=yes/good/important
Precisely defined? (clear) |
1 |
Useable? |
1 |
||||||
Is it applicable to other areas/ecosystems? (robust) |
1 |
||||||||
Sensitive? |
1 |
||||||||
Easy to detect, record and interpret? |
1 |
||||||||
Is it applicable to all landowners? |
|||||||||
Yes |
|||||||||
No |
x |
||||||||
Box D: Applicability to Different Landowners. Explain any differences.
N/A
Box E: Overlap:
None
Box F: Geo-Political Scale:
Global |
||
North America |
||
Intermountain West |
||
Study area |
||
Tenure |
||
Site |
Notes:
The definition of the indicator is unknown, which makes its assessment impossible.
Box G: Indicator Characteristics.
Diagnostic |
||
Predictive |
||
Both |
Notes:
The definition of the indicator is unknown, which makes its assessment impossible.
Box H: Indicator Function.
Structure |
||
Function/Process |
||
Composition |
||
Perturbation |
||
| Not Applicable |
Notes:
The definition of the indicator is unknown, which makes its assessment impossible.
Box I: Underlying Concepts:
The definition of the indicator is unknown, which makes its assessment impossible.
Box J: Relevance to Sustainable/Unsustainable Management :
The definition of the indicator is unknown, which makes its assessment impossible.
Box K: Measurement Methods:
None.
Box L: Data Required:
None.
Box M: Data Used for the North American Test :
None.
Box N: Example Results:
None.
Box O: Assessing the Practicality:
The definition of the indicator is unknown, which makes its assessment impossible.
Box P: Assessing the Information Value:
None.
Box Q: Overall assessment :
Rejected
Weaknesses:
Box R: Did you rewrite or revise to a new indicator. If so what?
No.
Box S: References:
N/A
Appendix:
Please record your notes on evaluating the indicator here.
N/A