Riparian Restoration
CHAPTER 2: IMPACTS (CONTINUED)
Traditional Design (Continued)
Existing Sites
In existing developed recreation sites, overuse and mismanagement also contribute to loss of valuable riparian resources. In many campgrounds and picnic areas, individual units become larger as visitors trample edge vegetation and trim branches. Units may serve more people than they were designed to accommodate. Visitors arrive with more and more recreational equipment (separate sleeping and eating tents) to use while camping, expanding campsite boundaries, trampling vegetation, compacting soils, and increasing the potential for runoff. See figure 20.

Figure 20—Many sites were designed for one car and a single tent.
Camping
habits
have changed. It is not uncommon to see two
tents at one site, or a recreational
vehicle, and other amenities
such
as hammocks and tiki torches. Trampled vegetation
and soil compaction are evident. This site is on the edge of a lake.
The pursuit of shrubs and saplings for firewood, hiking sticks, and so on causes considerable damage. Visitors trample the ground cover and saplings. For example, at a forest campground in Michigan where a portion of the campground had been closed, McEwen and Tocher (1976) found 76 saplings per acre in the open section of the campground and 338 saplings per acre in the closed section. Trampling was the cause for the low number of saplings in the open section (Manning 1979). This condition skews the age distribution of plants and affects soil and wildlife, that is, it affects the ecosystem.
Recreation impacts are at nodes (gathering points such as campgrounds, trail heads, and rest spots) and along travel routes (Ward and Berg 1973, as seen in Manning 1979). These impacted areas have a tendency to expand over time. Visitors create their own trails (social trails) between companion units or as short cuts to certain attractions. These expansions disturb or fragment riparian vegetation and interior habitats. See figures 21, 22, 23, and 24.

Figure 21—On this social trail, plants ere trampled and soil compacted.
Figure 22—This site is becoming larger and larger. There are no site
boundaries
and the entry is quite wide. A table is just barely
visible behind the tree
on the left. The
grill seems to be a
great distance from the table.

Figure 23—This user-made boardwalk, leading from a lake to
developed
campsites,
is a
hazard and an intrusion into riparian vegetation.

Figure 24—Riprap, in place of riparian vegetation, alongside a trampled,
compacted
streambank at a developed picnic site. Alder trees grow at
the base of a riprap-covered
bank.
