Introduction Status - FY 06 Status - FY 07 Status - FY 08 Conclusion & Bibliography

Conclusion & Biblioigraphy

CONCLUSION

Completed tasks 1 & 2

bioacoustic tools (hardware & software) - "cutting -edge" and 1st generational.

document utility in multiple species vs single species detection (include cost-effectiveness)

test & evaluate Song Meter

document used of Song Meter & Song Scope by others - esp USGS, ARMI

BIOACOUSTICAL MONITORING REFERENCES

Acevedo, MA. and L.J. Villanueva-Rivera. 2006. Using automated digital recording systems as effective tools for the monitoring of birds and amphibians. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 34(1):211-214.

Agranat, I.D. 2007. Automatic detection of Cerulean warblers using autonomous recording units and Song Scope bioacoustic software. Final Report for USFS, San Dimas Technol. & Develop. Cntr. Nov. 2007. Wildlife Acoustics, Inc. 13p.

Baker, M.C. and D.M. Logue. 2003. Population differentiation in a complex bird sound: a comparison of three bioacoustical analysis procedures. Ethology. 109:223-242.

Boleman, N.T., G.P. Asner, P.J. Hart, and R.E. Martin. 2007. Multi-trophic invasion resistance in Hawaii: bioacoustic, field surveys, and airbone remote sensing. Ecological Appl. 17(8):2137-2144.

Brandes, T.S. 2008. Automated sound recording and analysis techniques for bird surveys and conservation. Bird Conserv. International 18:S163 - S173.

Charif, R.A. and M. Pitzrick. 2008. Automated detection of Cerulean warbler songs using XBAT data template detector software. Preliminary Report for USFS, San Dimas Technol. & Develop. Cntr. April 2008. Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Bioacoustics Research Prog. Tech. Rpt 02-02. 16p.

Haselmayer, J. and J.S. Quinn. 2000. A comparison of point counts and sound recording as bird survey methods in Amazonian southeast Peru. Condor. 102(4):887-893.

Hobson, K.A., R.S. Rempel, H. Greenwood, B. Turnbull, and S.L. Van Wilgenburg. 2002. Acoustic surveys of birds using electronic recordings: new potential from an omnidirectional microphone system. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 30(3):709-720.

Rempel, R.S., K.A. Hobson, G. Holborn, and S.L. Van Wilgenburg. 2005. Bioacoustic monitoring of forest songirds: interpreter variability and effects of configuration and digital processing methods in the laboratory. Journ. Field Ornithol.76 (1):1-11.