VMap_Base

File Geodatabase Feature Class

Thumbnail Not Available

Tags
hierarchical classification, eCognition, tree dominance type, tree canopy cover, R1-VMap, lifeform, Biology, Ecology, and Biophysical, Landsat 7, tree size, Northern Rockies


Summary

This dataset was produced for use at project levels of analysis and planning (in some cases additional work would be needed for site specific or project level work.

Description

VMap is a multi-level, existing vegetation geospatial database used to produce four primary map products; lifeform, tree canopy cover class, tree diameter, and tree dominance type. The VMap database can produce products to meet information needs at various levels of analysis according to National and Regional direction established by the Existing Vegetation Classification and Mapping Technical Guide (Brohman and Bryant, 2005) and the Region 1 Multi-level Classification, Mapping, Inventory, and Analysis System (Berglund and others, 2009). This feature class (VMap_Base) is to be used at base-levels (e.g., landscapes, projects) of analysis and contains features at least 1 acre in size. The details of vegetation classification, base-level database development, and VMap accuracy assessment are included in a variety of documents posted on the VMap web site (http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/gis/VMapWebPage.htm). This product was created by using an iterative and interactive process. Existing vegetation was described at multiple levels of spatial and thematic resolution. As a first step in the vegetation classification process, each stand polygon of the landscape was described by a suite of spectral and biophysical attributes. In total, the mean value of each of thirty seven different layers of information was summarized for each polygon. All of the information was derived from various levels of remotely sensed imagery, and topographically derived grid-based data layers. To provide a consistent processing environment, all data layers were formatted to ten meter pixel dimensions. This required that some data layers were generalized from 1m to 10m, while others were refined from 30m to 10m. The spectral information used in this project is based on imagery collected in 2011, as that was the date the initial stand polygon delineation was based on. It has since been found that a better and more efficient method for producing a Base and Mid level database is to "smooth" the segmentation on the Base level, drastically reducing the number of vertices within the database and dramatically increasing the computational efficiency of the database.

Credits

Use limitations

The USDA Forest Service manages resource information and derived data as a service to USDA Forest Service users of digital geographic data. The USDA Forest Service is in no way condoning or endorsing the application of these data for any given purpose. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data are suitable for the intended purpose. It is also the obligation of the user to apply those data in an appropriate and conscientious manner. The USDA Forest Service provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of these data.

Extent

West  -117.137123    East  -114.193934
North  47.312588    South  45.046023

Scale Range
Maximum (zoomed in)  1:5,000
Minimum (zoomed out)  1:150,000,000

ArcGIS Metadata 

Topics and Keywords 

*Content type  Downloadable Data
Export to FGDC CSDGM XML format as Resource Description No

Place keywords  Northern Rockies

Theme keywords  hierarchical classification, eCognition, tree dominance type, tree canopy cover, R1-VMap, lifeform, Biology, Ecology, and Biophysical, Landsat 7, tree size

Thesaurus
Title satellite imagery



Citation 

*Title VMap_Base

Presentation formats* digital map

Citation Contacts 

Responsible party
Organization's name USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Contact's role  originator

Responsible party
Organization's name USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Contact's role  publisher

Contact information
Address
Delivery point Missoula, MT



Resource Details 

Dataset languages  English (UNITED STATES)
Dataset character set  utf8 - 8 bit UCS Transfer Format

Status  completed
Spatial representation type* vector

*Processing environment Microsoft Windows 7 Version 6.1 (Build 7601) Service Pack 1; Esri ArcGIS 10.1.0.3035

ArcGIS item properties
*Name VMap_Base
*Location file://\\LTHP3450TP6\E$\CLR_NEZForestwideSimp_VMap_v12_R1ALB.gdb
*Access protocol Local Area Network

Extents 

Extent
Geographic extent
Bounding rectangle
Extent type  Extent used for searching
*West longitude -117.137123
*East longitude -114.193934
*North latitude 47.312588
*South latitude 45.046023
*Extent contains the resource Yes

Extent in the item's coordinate system
*West longitude 21915.000000
*East longitude 231225.000000
*South latitude 143265.000000
*North latitude 379575.000000
*Extent contains the resource Yes

Resource Points of Contact 

Point of contact
Individual's name Don Patterson
Organization's name USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Contact's position Geospatial Services Group Leader
Contact's role  point of contact

Contact information
Phone
Voice 406.329.3430
Fax 406.329.3198

Address
Type postal
Delivery point P.O.Box 7669
City Missoula
Administrative area MT
Postal code 59807
Country US
e-mail addressmailto:dpatterson01@fs.fed.us?subject=VMap_Base

Hours of service Monday-Friday, 8am-4:30 pm (MST)
Contact instructions
email preferred


Resource Maintenance 

Resource maintenance
Update frequency  as needed

Resource Constraints 

Legal constraints
Limitations of use
The USDA Forest Service manages resource information and derived data as a service to USDA Forest Service users of digital geographic data. The USDA Forest Service is in no way condoning or endorsing the application of these data for any given purpose. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data are suitable for the intended purpose. It is also the obligation of the user to apply those data in an appropriate and conscientious manner. The USDA Forest Service provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of these data.
Other constraints
This dataset is in the public domain, and the recipient may not assert any proprietary rights thereto nor represent it to anyone as other than a dataset produced by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region.
Constraints
Limitations of use
The USDA Forest Service manages resource information and derived data as a service to USDA Forest Service users of digital geographic data. The USDA Forest Service is in no way condoning or endorsing the application of these data for any given purpose. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data are suitable for the intended purpose. It is also the obligation of the user to apply those data in an appropriate and conscientious manner. The USDA Forest Service provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of these data.

Spatial Reference 

ArcGIS coordinate system
*Type Projected
*Geographic coordinate reference GCS_North_American_1983
*Projection Albers Conical Equal Area
*Coordinate reference details
Projected coordinate system
X origin -14484600
Y origin -8792900
XY scale 10000
Z origin -100000
Z scale 10000
M origin -100000
M scale 10000
XY tolerance 0.001
Z tolerance 0.001
M tolerance 0.001
High precision true
Well-known text PROJCS["Albers Conical Equal Area",GEOGCS["GCS_North_American_1983",DATUM["D_North_American_1983",SPHEROID["GRS_1980",6378137.0,298.257222101]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0.0],UNIT["Degree",0.0174532925199433]],PROJECTION["Albers"],PARAMETER["False_Easting",600000.0],PARAMETER["False_Northing",0.0],PARAMETER["Central_Meridian",-109.5],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_1",46.0],PARAMETER["Standard_Parallel_2",48.0],PARAMETER["Latitude_Of_Origin",44.0],UNIT["Meter",1.0]]

Reference system identifier
*Value 0

Spatial Data Properties 

Vector
*Level of topology for this dataset  geometry only

Geometric objects
Feature class name VMap_Base
*Object type  composite
*Object count 997979



Grid
Transformation parameters are available No



ArcGIS Feature Class Properties
Feature class name VMap_Base
*Feature type Simple
*Geometry type Polygon
*Has topology FALSE
*Feature count 997979
*Spatial index TRUE
*Linear referencing FALSE



Data Quality 

Lineage 

Process step
Description The path-level LandSAT 5 TM data were ortho-rectified to the 1 meter color infrared NAIP imagery 2011 using the Ortho-Rectification Module and the Landsat orbit model in ERDAS Imagine 11 as well as 10 meter digital elevation models. A minimum of at least 50 ground control points (GCP) throughout each of the unrectified images. Actual rectification involved the Cubic convolution algorithm and a 30m pixel size. The resulting Root Mean Square (RMS) error was less than one pixel or 30 m.



Process step
Description Compute classification of the Dry Grass type into two grass types (Bunch Grass and Single Stem Grass) using Random Forest alogrithm with field sample data and NAIP, Landsat, and Topographic variables.



Process step
Description Compute a hierearchical classification based on fuzzy membership values calculated using the image object values computed through the multiresolution segmentation. The classification scheme first divides out water from non-water; then vegetated from non-vegetated; tree from herbaceous and shrub; shrub from herbaceous; 4 tree canopy cover classes from the tree dominated lifeform; 4 tree size classes from the tree dominated lifeform (using Nearest Neighbor analysis); and 8-12 dominance types (using a Nearest Neighbor analysis).



Process step
Description Dissolved versions of the forest wide base level database were created for lifeform, tree canopy cover, tree diameter, and tree dominance type. A dissolve of tree canopy cover, tree diameter, tree dominance type combined was also created.



Process step
Description Compute classification of Grass and Shrub lifeform types into two ground litter cover classes using Random Forest alogrithm with field sample data and NAIP, Landsat, and Topographic variables.



Process step
Description Final forest base level database was created by combining the 10 map area databases together.



Process step
Description Calculate minimum and mean texture images from NAIP imagery for each sub-model.



Process step
Description Compute classification of the Dry Shrub type into two canopy cover classes using Random Forest alogrithm with field sample data and NAIP, Landsat, and Topographic variables.



Process step
Description Sample data for each class in the classification schema is then loaded, or digitized, into the eCognition project. eCognition will then return a histogram for each feature and each sample base, which displays the spectral distribution of the samples over the range of the data feature chosen.



Process step
Description An accuracy assessment was provided for the four primary map products to quantify accuracy following four distinct lines of analytical logic. VMap accuracy assessment data are those polygons associated with the Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) plot data. Summaries of the FIA plot data provide a means to achieve the most reliable dominance type and size determinations for each assessment reference polygon and can assist to some degree with canopy cover. The VMap accuracy assessment includes an area-weighted error matrix, which is based on the aerial extent of each class. The nature of errors in the classified map can, thus, be derived from the error matrix. A relatively recent innovation in accuracy assessment is the use of fuzzy sets for accuracy assessments. Fuzzy logic is designed to handle ambiguity and, therefore, constitutes the basis for part of the VMap accuracy assessment. Instead of assessing a site as correct/incorrect as in a traditional assessment, an assessment using fuzzy sets can rate a site as absolutely wrong, reasonable or acceptable match, good match, or absolutely right. The resulting accuracy assessment can then rate the seriousness of errors as well as absolute correctness/incorrectness. For these reasons, the VMap accuracy assessment includes a fuzzy set-based error matrix and an area-weighted fuzzy set-based error matrix.



Process step
Description Create an eCognition "project" using the source data layers. Load the 12 TM layers, 12 tassel cap transformations and derivatives for the fall Landsat scenes, 12 Principal Component analysis 6 texture image derivatives the DEM, pnv layer, NDVI image, subpath model mask, illumination mask, and the aspect/slope combination layer.



Process step
Description Path-level data subset to 13 map area regions based on the dissolved boundaries. Resample the 30m path level TM data to 5m resolution using ERDAS Imagine Cubic Convolution resampling technique.



Process step
Description Course level multiresolution segmentation using color infrared 5 meter NAIP imagery and texture band in eCognition software. Multiresolution segmentation is essentially a heuristic optimization procedure, which locally minimizes the average heterogeneity of image objects for a given resolution over the whole scene. Multiresolution segmentation is a method of generating image objects. It produces highly homogeneous segments in any chosen resolution, fitting your purpose. The resulting image segmentation, whose individual elements are referred to as image objects, can be universally applied to almost all data types. The image objects themselves, contain feature information based on the values of the pixels contained within the borders of each image object. These image object values are then used in the classification process, either through the use of fuzzy logic based membership functions or a Nearest neighbor analysis.



Source data
Description Derived from the 10 meter DEM using ArcGISs Spatial Analyst function. The raster created is the global radiation or total amount of incoming solar insolation (direct and diffuse) calculated for each location of the input DEM for one year. The output has unit watt hours per square meter (WH/m2). This surface was used as a biophysical predictor to create a Whitebark pine probability surface for input into eCognition for the Gallatin NF portion of the VMap and also for some of the non-forest classes (see Random Forest).

Source citation
Title Solar Radiation Index
Alternate titles  Solar Radiation





Source data
Description This layer contains the elevation information for each sub-path model. Illumination, slope and aspect were derived from the DEM.

Source citation
Title 10m Digital Elevation Model
Alternate titles  DEM





Source data
Description Through the segmentation process, eCognition calculates a number of transformations and derivatives on the input data layers. For each image object a mean and standard deviation, of the values of the pixels contained within the boundaries that image object, is calculated for each input data layer. There are also three (3) eCognition features that are calculated on a subset of the input data layers, in this case the six (6) (CH 1-5, 7) channels of the "peak greenness" TM scene and three (3) (CH 1-3) of the color infrared NAIP imagery. The first feature is termed "BRIGHTNESS", which is the sum of the mean values of those six (6) layers divided by their quantity computed for an image object. The second feature is "Maximim Difference" (MAX DIFF.) , which is the sum of the mean values of those six (6) layers minus (-) the derived BRIGHTNESS value.

Source citation
Title eCognition image object derived features
Alternate titles  BRIGHTNESS, MAX DIFF., RATIO, MIN, MAX, Standard Deviation





Source data
Description A series of calculations of texture were created from the color infrared NAIP imagery and used in the eCognition segmentation and map classification. Texture calculates a variance (minimum, mean) from an adaptive window around each pixel as its measure of texture. The resulting texture image or band is a composite of minimum variance values calculated for each pixel. Two sets of three banded texture images were created using these focal windows and parameters: The first three banded image was created from 1m NAIP using a minimum variance and focal windows of (3x3), (5X5), and (9X9), then resampled back to 5meters; the second three banded texture image was created from 5m NAIP using a mean variance and focal windows of (3X3), (5X5) and (9x9).

Source citation
Title Texture image bands
Alternate titles  Texture





Source data
Description In statistics, the generalized additive model (or GAM) is a statistical model developed by Trevor Hastie and Rob Tibshirani for blending properties of generalized linear models with additive models. This surface was used as a biophysical predictor to create a Whitebark pine probability surface for input into eCognition for the Gallatin NF portion of the VMap. The Whitebark probability surface was created using the statistical package R version 2.72 with a General Additive Model (GAM).

Source citation
Title Generalized Additive Model Prediction
Alternate titles  GAM





Source data
Description In machine learning, a random forest is a classifier that consists of many decision trees and outputs the class that is the mode of the classes output by individual trees. The algorithm for inducing a random forest was developed by Leo Breiman and Adele Cutler, and "Random Forests" is their trademark. The term came from random decision forests that was first proposed by Tin Kam Ho of Bell Labs in 1995. The method combines Breiman's "bagging" idea and Ho's "random subspace method" to construct a collection of decision trees with controlled variations. The Random Forests classifier is part of the open source statistical package R. The USDA Remote Sensing Applications Center created a CartTools Pythogn program script (contact Bonnie Ruefenacht for the latest version of this script 801-975-3828) which accesses Rs Random Forest to create prediction surfaces. This script was used to create additional non-forest class predictions. The Mid-level non-forest classes predicted with Random Forests include grass-bunch, grass-single-stem; the litter classes litter>90%, litter 60-89.9%, litter < 60%; and the xeric-shrub canopy classes xeric shrub10-24.9%, and xeric shrub > 25%.

Source citation
Title Random Forest Predictions
Alternate titles  Random Forest





Source data
Description The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is calculated as the normalized difference between the NIR and the Red bands (NIR - R)/(NIR + R). The NDVI is probably the most widely used vegetation index and has been shown to be related to a number of different biomass variables. Simple vegetation indices such as NDVI, however, provide an inadequate representation of complex vegetation cover as they are related only to the total amount of above-ground green leaf biomass, and give no indication of the types of vegetation present. Vegetated areas will generally yield a higher NDVI value than rock, which will have values greater than that of clouds, snow, and water. The 5meter NAIP imagery was used for the NDVI where applicable. In other cases, NDVI was calculated for the Landsat TM imagery was used.

Source citation
Title Normalized Difference Vegetation Index
Alternate titles  NDVI





Source data
Description The TC is a linear transformation of the reflectance calculated TM data that rotates the data structure such that the majority of the information contained in the 6 bands will occupy 3 dimensions that are directly related to the on-the-ground physical scene characteristics. These dimensions define planes of soils (brightness), vegetation (greenness), and a transitional zone that relates to canopy and soil moisture (wetness). These three dimensions capture 97%+ of the data variation in the 6 TM bands and can enable the discernment of key forest attributes (i.e., species, age, and structure).

Source citation
Title Kauth-Thomas Tassel-Cap (TC) Transformations
Alternate titles  brightness, greenness, wetness





Source data
Description These are the six channel TM image data that have been calibrated to exo-atmospheric reflectance to account for between scene variation in sun angle and solar elevation. These data provided the base imagery for the image segmentation, vegetation indices, and Kauth-Thomas Tassel-Cap transformations. This was the "peak greenness" imagery, upon which, the change detection was based.

Source medium name  CD-ROM
Source citation
Title Orthorectified path level TM data (imagery)
Alternate titles  summer imagery



Extent of the source data
Description
ground condition


Source data
Description This is the photogrammetrically interepreted and ground survey based "ground truth" data employed to model the classification membership functions and to drive the Nearest Neighbor analysis.

Source citation
Title Reference Data
Alternate titles  samples





Source data
Description VMap models for processing are based on general ecological or management units. They are restricted in size for better mapping precision and also to keep within the size limit restrictions of eCognition software.

Source citation
Title Model Boundary Data
Alternate titles  VMap model units





Source data
Description These layers are transformations of the DEM derivatives of aspect and percent slope that combines the information into single files for east/west (ewslp) and north/south (nsslp), respectively. These data have had a zonal majority calculated based on the z-grid for each sub-path model so that there is a unique value retained for each image object.

Source citation
Title Combined Slope and Aspect
Alternate titles  EWSLP/NSSLP





Source data
Description The Compound Topographic Index (CTI) was used as a biophysical predictor to create a Whitebark pine probability surface for input into eCognition for the Gallatin NF portion of the VMap and also for some of the non-forest classes (see Random Forest.) CTI is a steady state wetness index. The CTI is a function of both the slope and the upstream contributing area per unit width orthigonal to the flow direction. CTI was desigined for hillslope catenas. Accumulation numbers in flat areas will be very large and CTI will not be a relevant variable. CTI is highly correlated with several soil attributes such as horizon depth(r=0.55), silt percentage(r=0.61), organic matter content(r=0.57), and phosphorus(r=0.53) (Moore et al. 1993).The implementation of CTI can be shown as: CTI = ln (As / (tan (beta)) where As = Area Value calculated as(flow accumulation + 1 ) * (pixel area in m2)and beta is the slope expressed in radians. The ArcInfo approach to calculating Flow Direction uses the D8 algorithm producing very unrealistic results. Several other methods are available for calculating flow directions. One of the more robust approaches is the D infinity algorithm (Tarboton 1997). There is a freeware download and documentation for TARDEM http://www.engineering.usu.edu/dtarb/ or TAUDEM http://moose.cee.usu.edu/taudem/taudem.html. The derivative of the FLOWDIRECTION calculation from either of these two programs can be used in the CTI AML or you can calculate FLOWDIRECTION in GRID.

Source citation
Title Compound Topographic Index
Alternate titles  CTI





Source data
Description TRASP was used as a biophysical predictor to create a Whitebark pine probability surface for input into eCognition for the Gallatin NF portion of the VMap and also for some of the non-forest classes (see Random Forest.) The circular aspect variable is transformed to a radiation index (TRASP.) This transformation assigns a value of zero to land oriented in a north-northeast direction, (typically the coolest and wettest orientation), and a value of one on the hotter, dryer south-southwesterly slopes. The result is a continuous variable between 0 - 1 (Robert and Cooper 1989).TRASP=(1 - cos((pi / 180)(aspect - 30)))/2

Source citation
Title Solar-radiation aspect index
Alternate titles  TRASP





Source data
Description These are the four channel NAIP image data.

Source medium name  CD-ROM
Source citation
Title Orthorectified NAIP data (imagery)
Alternate titles  summer imagery



Extent of the source data
Description
ground condition


Geoprocessing history 

Process
Date 2014-03-06 12:50:23
Tool location c:\program files (x86)\arcgis\desktop10.1\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\AssignDomainToField
Command issued
AssignDomainToField VMap_Base LIFEFORM LIFEFORM #
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No

Process
Date 2014-03-06 12:50:27
Tool location c:\program files (x86)\arcgis\desktop10.1\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\AssignDomainToField
Command issued
AssignDomainToField VMap_Base DOM_MID_40 DOM_MID_40 #
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No

Process
Date 2014-03-06 12:51:09
Tool location c:\program files (x86)\arcgis\desktop10.1\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\AssignDomainToField
Command issued
AssignDomainToField VMap_Base DOM_MID_60 DOM_MID_60 #
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No

Process
Date 2014-03-06 12:52:38
Tool location c:\program files (x86)\arcgis\desktop10.1\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\AssignDomainToField
Command issued
AssignDomainToField VMap_Base DOM_GRP_6040 DOM_GRP_6040 #
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No

Process
Date 2014-03-06 12:52:53
Tool location c:\program files (x86)\arcgis\desktop10.1\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\AssignDomainToField
Command issued
AssignDomainToField VMap_Base TREECANOPY TREECANOPY #
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No

Process
Date 2014-03-06 12:53:03
Tool location c:\program files (x86)\arcgis\desktop10.1\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\AssignDomainToField
Command issued
AssignDomainToField VMap_Base TREESIZE TREESIZE #
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No

Process
Date 2014-03-06 12:53:20
Tool location c:\program files (x86)\arcgis\desktop10.1\ArcToolbox\Toolboxes\Data Management Tools.tbx\AssignDomainToField
Command issued
AssignDomainToField VMap_Base ASP_CLS ASP_CLS #
Include in lineage when exporting metadata No

Distribution 

Distributor
Contact information
Individual's name Jim Barber
Organization's name USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Contact's position GIS Specialist
Contact's role  distributor

Contact information
Phone
Voice 406-329-3093
Fax 406-329-3199

Address
e-mail addressmailto:jbarber@fs.fed.us?subject=VMap_Base

Hours of service M-F, 8am-4pm (MST)


Transfer options
Online source
Description  R1-VMap Dataset



Distribution format
*Name File Geodatabase Feature Class

Fields 

Details for object VMap_Base 
*Type Feature Class
*Row count 997979

Field OBJECTID 
*Alias OBJECTID
*Data type OID
*Width 4
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Internal ESRI number
Description source
ESRI
Description of values Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.



Field SHAPE 
*Alias SHAPE
*Data type Geometry
*Width 0
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Internal ESRI number
Description source
ESRI
Description of values Coordinates defining the features.



Field FOREST_ID 
*Alias FOREST_ID
*Data type String
*Width 50
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Polygon unique identifier


Field ACRES 
*Alias ACRES
*Data type Double
*Width 8
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Area of the polygon in acres


Field LIFEFORM 
*Alias LIFEFORM
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Enumerated_Domain  3100 HERB - Herbaceous
Enumerated_Domain  3300 SHRUB - Shrubland
Enumerated_Domain  4000 TREE - Tree
Enumerated_Domain  5000 WATER - Water
Enumerated_Domain  7000 SPVEG - Sparsely Vegetated


Field DOM_MID_40 
*Alias DOM_MID_40
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Enumerated_Domain  3100 HERB - Herbaceous
Enumerated_Domain  3300 SHRUB - Shrub
Enumerated_Domain  5000 WATER - Water
Enumerated_Domain  7000 SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated
Enumerated_Domain  8015 MX-PIPO - Ponderosa pine dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8025 MX-PSME - Douglas fir dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8055 MX-PICO - Lodgepole pine dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8065 MX-ABLA - Subalpine fir dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8075 MX-PIEN - Englemann spruce dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8125 MX-PIAL - Whitebark pine dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8155 MX-PIFL2 - Limber pine dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8165 MX-POPUL - Cottonwood dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8175 MX-POTR5 - Aspen dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8185 MX-JUNIP - Juniper dominated (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8400 IMIX - Shade-intolerant conifer mix (no single species >40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8500 TMIX - Shade-tolerant conifer mix (no single species >40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8600 HMIX - Hardwood mix (no single species >40% relative cover)


Field DOM_MID_60 
*Alias DOM_MID_60
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Enumerated_Domain  3100 HERB - Herbaceous
Enumerated_Domain  3300 SHRUB - Shrub
Enumerated_Domain  5000 WATER - Water
Enumerated_Domain  7000 SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated
Enumerated_Domain  8010 PIPO - Ponderosa pine dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8020 PSME - Douglas fir dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8050 PICO - Lodgepole pine dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8060 ABLA - Subalpine fir dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8070 PIEN - Englemann spruce dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8120 PIAL - Whitebark pine dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8150 PIFL2 - Limber pine dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8160 POPUL - Cottonwood dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8170 POTR5 - Aspen dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8180 JUNIP - Juniper dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8400 IMIX - Shade-intolerant conifer mix (no single species >60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8500 TMIX - Shade-tolerant conifer mix (no single species >60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8600 HMIX - Hardwood mix (no single species >60% relative cover)


Field DOM_GRP_6040 
*Alias DOM_GRP_6040
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Enumerated_Domain  3100 HERB - Herbaceous
Enumerated_Domain  3300 SHRUB - Shrub
Enumerated_Domain  5000 WATER - Water
Enumerated_Domain  7000 SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated
Enumerated_Domain  8010 PIPO - Ponderosa pine dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8013 PIPO-IMIX - Ponderosa pine intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8020 PSME - Douglas fir dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8023 PSME-IMIX - Douglas fir intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8050 PICO - Lodgepole pine dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8053 PICO-IMIX - Lodgepole pine intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8054 PICO-TMIX - Lodgepole pine tolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8060 ABLA - Subalpine fir dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8064 ABLA-TMIX - Subalpine fir tolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8070 PIEN - Englemann spruce dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8074 PIEN-TMIX - Englemann spruce tolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8120 PIAL - Whitebark pine dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8123 PIAL-IMIX - Whitebark pine intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8150 PIFL2 - Limber pine dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8153 PIFL2-IMIX - Limber pine intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8160 POPUL - Cottonwood dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8170 POTR5 - Aspen dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8180 JUNIP - Juniper dominated (>60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8183 JUNIP-IMIX - Juniper intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8400 IMIX - Shade-intolerant conifer mix (no single species >60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8500 TMIX - Shade-tolerant conifer mix (no single species >60% relative cover)
Enumerated_Domain  8600 HMIX - Hardwood mix (no single species >60% relative cover)


Field TREECANOPY 
*Alias TREECANOPY
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Enumerated_Domain  4001	CTR 10-24.9% - CTR 10-24.9%
Enumerated_Domain  4002	CTR 25-39.9% - CTR 25-39.9%
Enumerated_Domain  4003	CTR 40-59.9% - CTR 40-59.9%
Enumerated_Domain  4004	CTR >= 60% - CTR > 60%
Enumerated_Domain  3100	HERB - Herbaceous
Enumerated_Domain  3300	SHRUB - Shrub
Enumerated_Domain  5000	WATER - Water
Enumerated_Domain  7000	SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated
Enumerated_Domain  8600	TREE-DECID - Deciduous Tree


Field TREESIZE 
*Alias TREESIZE
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Enumerated_Domain  4100 DBH 0-4.9" - Basal area weighted average diameter 0-4.9"
Enumerated_Domain  4200 DBH 5-9.9" - Basal area weighted average diameter 5-9.9"
Enumerated_Domain  4300 DBH 10-14.9" - Basal area weighted average diameter 10-14.9"
Enumerated_Domain  4400 DBH >= 15" - Basal area weighted average diameter > 15"
Enumerated_Domain  3100	HERB - Herbaceous
Enumerated_Domain  3300	SHRUB - Shrub
Enumerated_Domain  5000	WATER - Water
Enumerated_Domain  7000	SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated
Enumerated_Domain  8600	TREE-DECID - Deciduous Tree


Field NONFORLITTER 
*Alias NONFORLITTER
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0



Field SHRUBCANOPY 
*Alias SHRUBCANOPY
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0



Field ELEV 
*Alias ELEV
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Average elevation of the polygon in meters


Field ASP_CLS 
*Alias ASP_CLS
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Enumerated_Domain  9 - Flat (slope < 10%)
Enumerated_Domain  1 - North (338-360 & 0-22 degrees)
Enumerated_Domain  2 - Northeast (23-68 degrees)
Enumerated_Domain  3 - East (68-112 degrees)
Enumerated_Domain  4 - Southeast (113-157 degrees)
Enumerated_Domain  5 - South (158-202 degrees)
Enumerated_Domain  6 - Southwest (203-247 degrees)
Enumerated_Domain  7 - West (248-292 degrees)
Enumerated_Domain  8 - Northwest (293-337 degrees)


Field SLOPE 
*Alias SLOPE
*Data type SmallInteger
*Width 2
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Average percent slope of the polygon


Field SHAPE_Length 
*Alias SHAPE_Length
*Data type Double
*Width 8
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Length of feature in internal units.
Description source
ESRI
Description of values Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.



Field SHAPE_Area 
*Alias SHAPE_Area
*Data type Double
*Width 8
*Precision 0
*Scale 0
Field description
Area of feature in internal units squared.
Description source
ESRI
Description of values Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.





Metadata Details 

Metadata language English (UNITED STATES)
Metadata character set  utf8 - 8 bit UCS Transfer Format

Scope of the data described by the metadata  dataset
Scope name* dataset

*Last update 2014-03-03

ArcGIS metadata properties
Metadata format ArcGIS 1.0
Standard or profile used to edit metadata FGDC

Created in ArcGIS for the item 2012-04-13 09:07:54
Last modified in ArcGIS for the item 2014-03-03 15:21:24

Automatic updates
Have been performed Yes
Last update 2014-03-03 14:16:40


Metadata Contacts 

Metadata contact
Individual's name Steve Brown
Organization's name USDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Contact's position Region 1 Remote Sensing Specialist
Contact's role  point of contact

Contact information
Phone
Voice 406.329.3514
Fax 406.329.3198

Address
Type physical
Delivery point P.O. Box 7669
Delivery point 200 East Broadway
City Missoula
Administrative area MT
Postal code 59807
Country US
e-mail addressmailto:stevebrown@fs.fed.us?subject=VMap_Base

Hours of service M_F, 8am-4pm (MST)
Contact instructions
email preferred


Thumbnail and Enclosures 

Enclosure
Enclosure type  File
Description of enclosure original metadata
Original metadata document, which was translated yes
Source metadata format fgdc

FGDC Metadata (read-only) 

Identification 

Citation
Citation Information
OriginatorUSDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Publication DateApril, 2011
Publication TimeUnknown
Title
VMap_Base
Geospatial Data Presentation Formvector digital data
Publication Information
Publication PlaceMissoula, MT
PublisherUSDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Online Linkage\\PCHP9040QWY\Y\GIS_RS\VMap\Published_Data\VMap_v12\FNF_VMap_v12_R1ALB041212.gdb

Description
Abstract
VMap is a multi-level, existing vegetation geospatial database used to produce four primary map products; lifeform, tree canopy cover class, tree diameter, and tree dominance type. The VMap database can produce products to meet information needs at various levels of analysis according to National and Regional direction established by the Existing Vegetation Classification and Mapping Technical Guide (Brohman and Bryant, 2005) and the Region 1 Multi-level Classification, Mapping, Inventory, and Analysis System (Berglund and others, 2009). This feature class (VMap_Base) is to be used at base-levels (e.g., landscapes, projects) of analysis and contains features at least 1 acre in size. The details of vegetation classification, base-level database development, and VMap accuracy assessment are included in a variety of documents posted on the VMap web site (http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/gis/VMapWebPage.htm). This product was created by using an iterative and interactive process. Existing vegetation was described at multiple levels of spatial and thematic resolution. As a first step in the vegetation classification process, each stand polygon of the landscape was described by a suite of spectral and biophysical attributes. In total, the mean value of each of thirty seven different layers of information was summarized for each polygon. All of the information was derived from various levels of remotely sensed imagery, and topographically derived grid-based data layers. To provide a consistent processing environment, all data layers were formatted to ten meter pixel dimensions. This required that some data layers were generalized from 1m to 10m, while others were refined from 30m to 10m. The spectral information used in this project is based on imagery collected in 2011, as that was the date the initial stand polygon delineation was based on. It has since been found that a better and more efficient method for producing a Base and Mid level database is to "smooth" the segmentation on the Base level, drastically reducing the number of vertices within the database and dramatically increasing the computational efficiency of the database.
Purpose
This dataset was produced for use at project levels of analysis and planning (in some cases additional work would be needed for site specific or project level work.
Time Period of Content
Time Period Information
Single Date/Time
Calendar Date04/13/12
Currentness Reference
publication date
Status
ProgressComplete
Maintenance and Update FrequencyAs needed

Spatial Domain
Bounding Coordinates
West Bounding Coordinate-115.005919
East Bounding Coordinate-112.818034
North Bounding Coordinate49.066577
South Bounding Coordinate47.158056

Keywords
Theme
Theme Keyword Thesaurussatellite imagery
Theme KeywordLandsat 7
Theme KeywordR1-VMap
Theme KeywordeCognition
Theme Keywordlifeform
Theme Keywordtree dominance type
Theme Keywordtree canopy cover
Theme Keywordtree size
Theme Keywordhierarchical classification
Theme KeywordBiology, Ecology, and Biophysical

Place
Place KeywordNorthern Rockies

Access Constraints
This dataset is in the public domain, and the recipient may not assert any proprietary rights thereto nor represent it to anyone as other than a dataset produced by the USDA Forest Service, Northern Region.
Use Constraints
The USDA Forest Service manages resource information and derived data as a service to USDA Forest Service users of digital geographic data. The USDA Forest Service is in no way condoning or endorsing the application of these data for any given purpose. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data are suitable for the intended purpose. It is also the obligation of the user to apply those data in an appropriate and conscientious manner. The USDA Forest Service provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of these data.
Point of Contact
Contact Information
Contact Person Primary
Contact PersonDon Patterson
Contact OrganizationUSDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Contact PositionGeospatial Services Group Leader
Contact Address
Address Typephysical address
Address200 East Broadway
CityMissoula
State or ProvinceMT
Postal Code59802
CountryUNITED STATES

Contact Address
Address Typemailing address
AddressP.O.Box 7669
CityMissoula
State or ProvinceMT
Postal Code59807
CountryUNITED STATES

Contact Voice Telephone406.329.3430
Contact Facsimile Telephone406.329.3198
Contact Electronic Mail Addressmailto:dpatterson01@fs.fed.us?subject=VMap_Base
Hours of ServiceMonday-Friday, 8am-4:30 pm (MST)
Contact Instructions
email preferred

Native Data Set Environment
Microsoft Windows XP Version 5.1 (Build 2600) Service Pack 3; ESRI ArcCatalog 9.3.1.1850

Data Quality 

Positional Accuracy
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
Horizontal Positional Accuracy Report
<15 meters
Quantitative Horizontal Positional Accuracy Assessment
Horizontal Positional Accuracy Value15
Lineage
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Orthorectified NAIP data (imagery)

Type of Source MediaCD-ROM
Source Time Period of Content
Time Period Information
Single Date/Time
Calendar DateJuly & August/2009
Source Currentness Reference
ground condition
Source Citation Abbreviation
summer imagery
Source Contribution
These are the four channel NAIP image data.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Orthorectified path level TM data (imagery)

Type of Source MediaCD-ROM
Source Time Period of Content
Time Period Information
Single Date/Time
Calendar DateAugust & September/2009
Source Currentness Reference
ground condition
Source Citation Abbreviation
summer imagery
Source Contribution
These are the six channel TM image data that have been calibrated to exo-atmospheric reflectance to account for between scene variation in sun angle and solar elevation.  These data provided the base imagery for the image segmentation, vegetation indices, and Kauth-Thomas Tassel-Cap transformations.  This was the "peak greenness" imagery, upon which, the change detection was based.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Kauth-Thomas Tassel-Cap (TC) Transformations

Source Citation Abbreviation
brightness, greenness, wetness
Source Contribution
The TC is a linear transformation of the reflectance calculated TM data that rotates the data structure such that the majority of the information contained in the 6 bands will occupy 3 dimensions that are directly related to the on-the-ground physical scene characteristics.  These dimensions define planes of soils (brightness), vegetation (greenness), and a transitional zone that relates to canopy and soil moisture (wetness).  These three dimensions capture 97%+ of the data variation in the 6 TM bands and can enable the discernment of key forest attributes (i.e., species, age, and structure).
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index

Source Citation Abbreviation
NDVI
Source Contribution
The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) is calculated as the normalized difference between the NIR and the Red bands (NIR - R)/(NIR + R). The NDVI is probably the most widely used vegetation index and has been shown to be related to a number of different biomass variables. Simple vegetation indices such as NDVI, however, provide an inadequate representation of complex vegetation cover as they are related only to the total amount of above-ground green leaf biomass, and give no indication of the types of vegetation present. Vegetated areas will generally yield a higher NDVI value than rock, which will have values greater than that of clouds, snow, and water.  The 5meter NAIP imagery was used for the NDVI where applicable.   In other cases, NDVI was calculated for the Landsat TM imagery was used.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Solar-radiation aspect index

Source Citation Abbreviation
TRASP
Source Contribution
TRASP was used as a biophysical predictor to create a Whitebark pine probability surface for input into eCognition for the Gallatin NF portion of the VMap and also for some of the non-forest classes (see Random Forest.)  The circular aspect variable is transformed to a radiation index (TRASP.)  This transformation assigns a value of zero to land oriented in a north-northeast direction, (typically the coolest and wettest orientation), and a value of one on the hotter, dryer south-southwesterly slopes. The result is a continuous variable between 0 - 1 (Robert and Cooper 1989).TRASP=(1 - cos((pi / 180)(aspect - 30)))/2
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Compound Topographic Index

Source Citation Abbreviation
CTI
Source Contribution
The Compound Topographic Index (CTI) was used as a biophysical predictor to create a Whitebark pine probability surface for input into eCognition for the Gallatin NF portion of the VMap and also for some of the non-forest classes (see Random Forest.)  CTI is a steady state wetness index. The CTI is a function of both the slope and the upstream contributing area per unit width orthigonal to the flow direction. CTI was desigined for hillslope catenas. Accumulation numbers in flat areas will be very large and CTI will not be a relevant variable. CTI is highly correlated with several soil attributes such as horizon depth(r=0.55), silt percentage(r=0.61), organic matter content(r=0.57), and phosphorus(r=0.53) (Moore et al. 1993).The implementation of CTI can be shown as: CTI = ln (As / (tan (beta)) where As = Area Value calculated as(flow accumulation + 1 ) * (pixel area in m2)and beta is the slope expressed in radians.  The ArcInfo approach to calculating Flow Direction uses the D8 algorithm producing very unrealistic results. Several other methods are available for calculating flow directions. One of the more robust approaches is the D infinity algorithm (Tarboton 1997). There is a freeware download and documentation for TARDEM http://www.engineering.usu.edu/dtarb/ or TAUDEM http://moose.cee.usu.edu/taudem/taudem.html.  The derivative of the FLOWDIRECTION calculation from either of these two programs can be used in the CTI AML or you can calculate FLOWDIRECTION in GRID.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
10m Digital Elevation Model

Type of Source Media10m NED
Source Citation Abbreviation
DEM
Source Contribution
This layer contains the elevation information for each sub-path model. Illumination, slope and aspect were derived from the DEM.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Solar Radiation Index

Source Citation Abbreviation
Solar Radiation
Source Contribution
Derived from the 10 meter DEM using ArcGISs Spatial Analyst function. The raster created is the global radiation or total amount of incoming solar insolation (direct and diffuse) calculated for each location of the input DEM for one year.   The output has unit watt hours per square meter (WH/m2).  This surface was used as a biophysical predictor to create a Whitebark pine probability surface for input into eCognition for the Gallatin NF portion of the VMap and also for some of the non-forest classes (see Random Forest).
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Random Forest Predictions

Source Citation Abbreviation
Random Forest
Source Contribution
In machine learning, a random forest is a classifier that consists of many decision trees and outputs the class that is the mode of the classes output by individual trees. The algorithm for inducing a random forest was developed by Leo Breiman and Adele Cutler, and "Random Forests" is their trademark. The term came from random decision forests that was first proposed by Tin Kam Ho of Bell Labs in 1995. The method combines Breiman's "bagging" idea and Ho's "random subspace method" to construct a collection of decision trees with controlled variations.  The Random Forests classifier is part of the open source statistical package R.  The USDA Remote Sensing Applications Center created a CartTools Pythogn program script (contact Bonnie Ruefenacht for the latest version of this script 801-975-3828) which accesses Rs Random Forest to create prediction surfaces. This script was used to create additional non-forest class predictions.  The Mid-level non-forest classes predicted with Random Forests include grass-bunch, grass-single-stem; the litter classes litter>90%, litter 60-89.9%, litter < 60%; and the xeric-shrub canopy classes xeric shrub10-24.9%, and xeric shrub > 25%.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Generalized Additive Model Prediction

Source Citation Abbreviation
GAM
Source Contribution
In statistics, the generalized additive model (or GAM) is a statistical model developed by Trevor Hastie and Rob Tibshirani for blending properties of generalized linear models with additive models. This surface was used as a biophysical predictor to create a Whitebark pine probability surface for input into eCognition for the Gallatin NF portion of the VMap. The Whitebark probability surface was created using the statistical package R version 2.72 with a General Additive Model (GAM).
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Combined Slope and Aspect

Source Citation Abbreviation
EWSLP/NSSLP
Source Contribution
These layers are transformations of the DEM derivatives of aspect and percent slope that combines the information into single files for east/west (ewslp) and north/south (nsslp), respectively. These data have had a zonal majority calculated based on the z-grid for each sub-path model so that there is a unique value retained for each image object.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Texture image bands

Source Citation Abbreviation
Texture
Source Contribution
A series of calculations of texture were created from the color infrared NAIP imagery and used in the eCognition segmentation and map classification. Texture calculates a variance (minimum, mean) from an adaptive window around each pixel as its measure of texture. The resulting texture image or band is a composite of minimum variance values calculated for each pixel.  Two sets of three banded texture images were created using these focal windows and parameters:  The first three banded image was created from 1m NAIP using a minimum variance and focal windows of (3x3), (5X5), and (9X9), then resampled back to 5meters; the second three banded texture image was created from 5m NAIP using a mean variance and focal windows of (3X3), (5X5) and (9x9).
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Model Boundary Data

Source Citation Abbreviation
VMap model units
Source Contribution
VMap models for processing are based on general ecological or management units.  They are restricted in size for better mapping precision and also to keep within the size limit restrictions of eCognition software.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
eCognition image object derived features

Source Citation Abbreviation
BRIGHTNESS, MAX DIFF., RATIO, MIN, MAX, Standard Deviation
Source Contribution
Through the segmentation process, eCognition calculates a number of transformations and derivatives on the input data layers. For each image object a mean and standard deviation, of the values of the pixels contained within the boundaries that image object, is calculated for each input data layer. There are also three (3) eCognition features that are calculated on a subset of the input data layers, in this case the six (6) (CH 1-5, 7) channels of the "peak greenness" TM scene and three (3) (CH 1-3) of the color infrared NAIP imagery. The first feature is termed "BRIGHTNESS", which is the sum of the mean values of those six (6) layers divided by their quantity computed for an image object. The second feature is "Maximim Difference" (MAX DIFF.) , which is the sum of the mean values of those six (6) layers minus (-) the derived BRIGHTNESS value.
Source Information
Source Citation
Citation Information
Title
Reference Data

Source Citation Abbreviation
samples
Source Contribution
This is the photogrammetrically interepreted and ground survey based "ground truth" data employed to model the classification membership functions and to drive the Nearest Neighbor analysis.
Process Step
Process Description
The path-level LandSAT 5 TM data were ortho-rectified to the 1 meter color infrared NAIP imagery 2009 using the Ortho-Rectification Module and the Landsat orbit model in ERDAS Imagine 9.2 as well as 10 meter digital elevation models. A minimum of at least 50 ground control points (GCP) throughout each of the unrectified images. Actual rectification involved the Cubic convolution algorithm and a 30m pixel size. The resulting Root Mean Square (RMS) error was less than one pixel or 30 m.


Process Step
Process Description
Path-level data subset to 13 map area regions based on the dissolved boundaries. Resample the 30m path level TM data to 5m resolution using ERDAS Imagine Cubic Convolution resampling technique.


Process Step
Process Description
Calculate minimum and mean texture images from NAIP imagery for each sub-model.


Process Step
Process Description
Create an eCognition "project" using the source data layers. Load the 12 TM layers, 12 tassel cap transformations and derivatives for the fall Landsat scenes, 12 Principal Component analysis 6 texture image derivatives the DEM, pnv layer, NDVI image, subpath model mask, illumination mask, and the aspect/slope combination layer.


Process Step
Process Description
Course level multiresolution segmentation using color infrared 5 meter NAIP imagery and texture band in eCognition software. Multiresolution segmentation is essentially a heuristic optimization procedure, which locally minimizes the average heterogeneity of image objects for a given resolution over the whole scene. Multiresolution segmentation is a method of generating image objects. It produces highly homogeneous segments in any chosen resolution, fitting your purpose. The resulting image segmentation, whose individual elements are referred to as image objects, can be universally applied to almost all data types. The image objects themselves, contain feature information based on the values of the pixels contained within the borders of each image object. These image object values are then used in the classification process, either through the use of fuzzy logic based membership functions or a Nearest neighbor analysis.


Process Step
Process Description
Sample data for each class in the classification schema is then loaded, or digitized, into the eCognition project. eCognition will then return a histogram for each feature and each sample base, which displays the spectral distribution of the samples over the range of the data feature chosen.


Process Step
Process Description
Compute a hierearchical classification based on fuzzy membership values calculated using the image object values computed through the multiresolution segmentation. The classification scheme first divides out water from non-water; then vegetated from non-vegetated; tree from herbaceous and shrub; shrub from herbaceous; 4 tree canopy cover classes from the tree dominated lifeform; 4 tree size classes from the tree dominated lifeform (using Nearest Neighbor analysis); and 8-12 dominance types (using a Nearest Neighbor analysis).


Process Step
Process Description
Compute classification of the Dry Grass type into two grass types (Bunch Grass and Single Stem Grass) using Random Forest alogrithm with field sample data and NAIP, Landsat, and Topographic variables.


Process Step
Process Description
Compute classification of the Dry Shrub type into two canopy cover classes using Random Forest alogrithm with field sample data and NAIP, Landsat, and Topographic variables.


Process Step
Process Description
Compute classification of Grass and Shrub lifeform types into two ground litter cover classes using Random Forest alogrithm with field sample data and NAIP, Landsat, and Topographic variables.


Process Step
Process Description
Final forest base level database was created by combining the 13 map area databases together and two map area databases from the 2009 Vmap m2901 and m2902 datasets.


Process Step
Process Description
Dissolved versions of the forest wide base level database were created for lifeform, tree canopy cover, tree diameter, and tree dominance type.  A dissolve of tree canopy cover, tree diameter, tree dominance type combined was also created.


Process Step
Process Description
An accuracy assessment was provided for the four primary map products to quantify accuracy following four distinct lines of analytical logic. VMap accuracy assessment data are those polygons associated with the Forest Inventory Analysis (FIA) plot data.   Summaries of the FIA plot data provide a means to achieve the most reliable dominance type and size determinations for each assessment reference polygon and can assist to some degree with canopy cover. The VMap accuracy assessment includes an area-weighted error matrix, which is based on the aerial extent of each class. The nature of errors in the classified map can, thus, be derived from the error matrix. A relatively recent innovation in accuracy assessment is the use of fuzzy sets for accuracy assessments. Fuzzy logic is designed to handle ambiguity and, therefore, constitutes the basis for part of the VMap accuracy assessment. Instead of assessing a site as correct/incorrect as in a traditional assessment, an assessment using fuzzy sets can rate a site as absolutely wrong, reasonable or acceptable match, good match, or absolutely right. The resulting accuracy assessment can then rate the seriousness of errors as well as absolute correctness/incorrectness. For these reasons, the VMap accuracy assessment includes a fuzzy set-based error matrix and an area-weighted fuzzy set-based error matrix.


Process Step
Process Description
Metadata imported.
Source Used Citation Abbreviation
C:\DOCUME~1\cfisher\LOCALS~1\Temp\xmlD.tmp
Process Date2011-04-04
Process Time09:17:03

Process Step
Process Description
Metadata imported.
Source Used Citation Abbreviation
C:\DOCUME~1\hweldon\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml90A2.tmp
Process Date2012-03-29
Process Time15:20:36

Process Step
Process Description
Metadata imported.
Source Used Citation Abbreviation
C:\DOCUME~1\hweldon\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml300F.tmp
Process Date2012-04-12
Process Time12:54:55

Process Step
Process Description
Metadata imported.
Source Used Citation Abbreviation
C:\DOCUME~1\hweldon\LOCALS~1\Temp\xml3025.tmp
Process Date2012-04-13
Process Time09:07:54

Spatial Reference 

Horizontal Coordinate System Definition
Planar
Planar Coordinate Information
Planar Coordinate Encoding Methodcoordinate pair
Coordinate Representation
Abscissa Resolution0.000100
Ordinate Resolution0.000100
Planar Distance Unitsmeters

Geodetic Model
Horizontal Datum NameNorth American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid NameGeodetic Reference System 80
Semi-major Axis6378137.000000
Denominator of Flattening Ratio298.257222

Vertical Coordinate System Definition
Altitude System Definition
Altitude Resolution0.000100
Altitude Encoding MethodExplicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates

Entities and Attributes 

Detailed Description
Entity Type
Entity Type LabelVMap_Base

Attribute
Attribute LabelOBJECTID
Attribute Definition
Internal ESRI number
Attribute Definition SourceESRI
Attribute Domain Values
Unrepresentable Domain
Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.

Attribute
Attribute LabelSHAPE
Attribute Definition
Internal ESRI number
Attribute Definition SourceESRI
Attribute Domain Values
Unrepresentable Domain
Coordinates defining the features.

Attribute
Attribute LabelFOREST_ID
Attribute Definition
Polygon unique identifier

Attribute
Attribute LabelACRES
Attribute Definition
Area of the polygon in acres

Attribute
Attribute LabelLIFEFORM
Attribute Definition
Enumerated_Domain 3100 HERB - Herbaceous Enumerated_Domain 3300 SHRUB - Shrubland Enumerated_Domain 4000 TREE - Tree Enumerated_Domain 5000 WATER - Water Enumerated_Domain 7000 SPVEG - Sparsely Vegetated

Attribute
Attribute LabelDOM_MID_40
Attribute Definition
Enumerated_Domain 3100 HERB - Herbaceous Enumerated_Domain 3300 SHRUB - Shrub Enumerated_Domain 5000 WATER - Water Enumerated_Domain 7000 SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated Enumerated_Domain 8015 MX-PIPO - Ponderosa pine dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8025 MX-PSME - Douglas fir dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8055 MX-PICO - Lodgepole pine dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8065 MX-ABLA - Subalpine fir dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8075 MX-PIEN - Englemann spruce dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8125 MX-PIAL - Whitebark pine dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8155 MX-PIFL2 - Limber pine dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8165 MX-POPUL - Cottonwood dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8175 MX-POTR5 - Aspen dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8185 MX-JUNIP - Juniper dominated (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8400 IMIX - Shade-intolerant conifer mix (no single species >40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8500 TMIX - Shade-tolerant conifer mix (no single species >40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8600 HMIX - Hardwood mix (no single species >40% relative cover)

Attribute
Attribute LabelDOM_MID_60
Attribute Definition
Enumerated_Domain 3100 HERB - Herbaceous Enumerated_Domain 3300 SHRUB - Shrub Enumerated_Domain 5000 WATER - Water Enumerated_Domain 7000 SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated Enumerated_Domain 8010 PIPO - Ponderosa pine dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8020 PSME - Douglas fir dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8050 PICO - Lodgepole pine dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8060 ABLA - Subalpine fir dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8070 PIEN - Englemann spruce dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8120 PIAL - Whitebark pine dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8150 PIFL2 - Limber pine dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8160 POPUL - Cottonwood dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8170 POTR5 - Aspen dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8180 JUNIP - Juniper dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8400 IMIX - Shade-intolerant conifer mix (no single species >60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8500 TMIX - Shade-tolerant conifer mix (no single species >60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8600 HMIX - Hardwood mix (no single species >60% relative cover)

Attribute
Attribute LabelDOM_GRP_6040
Attribute Definition
Enumerated_Domain 3100 HERB - Herbaceous Enumerated_Domain 3300 SHRUB - Shrub Enumerated_Domain 5000 WATER - Water Enumerated_Domain 7000 SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated Enumerated_Domain 8010 PIPO - Ponderosa pine dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8013 PIPO-IMIX - Ponderosa pine intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8020 PSME - Douglas fir dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8023 PSME-IMIX - Douglas fir intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8050 PICO - Lodgepole pine dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8053 PICO-IMIX - Lodgepole pine intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8054 PICO-TMIX - Lodgepole pine tolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8060 ABLA - Subalpine fir dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8064 ABLA-TMIX - Subalpine fir tolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8070 PIEN - Englemann spruce dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8074 PIEN-TMIX - Englemann spruce tolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8120 PIAL - Whitebark pine dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8123 PIAL-IMIX - Whitebark pine intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8150 PIFL2 - Limber pine dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8153 PIFL2-IMIX - Limber pine intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8160 POPUL - Cottonwood dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8170 POTR5 - Aspen dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8180 JUNIP - Juniper dominated (>60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8183 JUNIP-IMIX - Juniper intolerant conifer mix (>40% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8400 IMIX - Shade-intolerant conifer mix (no single species >60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8500 TMIX - Shade-tolerant conifer mix (no single species >60% relative cover) Enumerated_Domain 8600 HMIX - Hardwood mix (no single species >60% relative cover)

Attribute
Attribute LabelTREECANOPY
Attribute Definition
Enumerated_Domain 4001 CTR 10-24.9% - CTR 10-24.9% Enumerated_Domain 4002 CTR 25-39.9% - CTR 25-39.9% Enumerated_Domain 4003 CTR 40-59.9% - CTR 40-59.9% Enumerated_Domain 4004 CTR >= 60% - CTR > 60% Enumerated_Domain 3100 HERB - Herbaceous Enumerated_Domain 3300 SHRUB - Shrub Enumerated_Domain 5000 WATER - Water Enumerated_Domain 7000 SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated Enumerated_Domain 8600 TREE-DECID - Deciduous Tree

Attribute
Attribute LabelTREESIZE
Attribute Definition
Enumerated_Domain 4100 DBH 0-4.9" - Basal area weighted average diameter 0-4.9" Enumerated_Domain 4200 DBH 5-9.9" - Basal area weighted average diameter 5-9.9" Enumerated_Domain 4300 DBH 10-14.9" - Basal area weighted average diameter 10-14.9" Enumerated_Domain 4400 DBH >= 15" - Basal area weighted average diameter > 15" Enumerated_Domain 3100 HERB - Herbaceous Enumerated_Domain 3300 SHRUB - Shrub Enumerated_Domain 5000 WATER - Water Enumerated_Domain 7000 SPVEG - Sparsely vegetated Enumerated_Domain 8600 TREE-DECID - Deciduous Tree

Attribute
Attribute LabelNONFORLITTER

Attribute
Attribute LabelSHRUBCANOPY

Attribute
Attribute LabelELEV
Attribute Definition
Average elevation of the polygon in meters

Attribute
Attribute LabelASP_CLS
Attribute Definition
Enumerated_Domain 9 - Flat (slope < 10%) Enumerated_Domain 1 - North (338-360 & 0-22 degrees) Enumerated_Domain 2 - Northeast (23-68 degrees) Enumerated_Domain 3 - East (68-112 degrees) Enumerated_Domain 4 - Southeast (113-157 degrees) Enumerated_Domain 5 - South (158-202 degrees) Enumerated_Domain 6 - Southwest (203-247 degrees) Enumerated_Domain 7 - West (248-292 degrees) Enumerated_Domain 8 - Northwest (293-337 degrees)

Attribute
Attribute LabelSLOPE
Attribute Definition
Average percent slope of the polygon

Attribute
Attribute LabelSHAPE_Length
Attribute Definition
Length of feature in internal units.
Attribute Definition SourceESRI
Attribute Domain Values
Unrepresentable Domain
Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.

Attribute
Attribute LabelSHAPE_Area
Attribute Definition
Area of feature in internal units squared.
Attribute Definition SourceESRI
Attribute Domain Values
Unrepresentable Domain
Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.

Distribution Information 

Distributor
Contact Information
Contact Person Primary
Contact PersonJim Barber
Contact OrganizationUSDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Contact PositionGIS Specialist
Contact Voice Telephone406-329-3093
Contact Facsimile Telephone406-329-3199
Contact Electronic Mail Addressmailto:jbarber@fs.fed.us?subject=VMap_Base
Hours of ServiceM-F, 8am-4pm (MST)

Resource DescriptionR1-VMap Dataset
Distribution Liability
The USDA Forest Service manages resource information and derived data as a service to USDA Forest Service users of digital geographic data. The USDA Forest Service is in no way condoning or endorsing the application of these data for any given purpose. It is the sole responsibility of the user to determine whether or not the data are suitable for the intended purpose. It is also the obligation of the user to apply those data in an appropriate and conscientious manner. The USDA Forest Service provides no warranty, nor accepts any liability occurring from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading data, or from any incorrect, incomplete, or misleading use of these data.

Metadata Reference 

Metadata Date2013-06-18
Metadata Contact
Contact Information
Contact Organization Primary
Contact OrganizationUSDA Forest Service, Northern Region, Engineering, Geospatial Group
Contact PersonSteve Brown
Contact PositionRegion 1 Remote Sensing Specialist
Contact Address
Address Typemailing and physical address
AddressP.O. Box 7669
Address200 East Broadway
CityMissoula
State or ProvinceMT
Postal Code59807
CountryUNITED STATES

Contact Address
Address Typephysical address
AddressP.O. Box 7669
Address200 East Broadway
CityMissoula
State or ProvinceMT
Postal Code59807
CountryUNITED STATES

Contact Voice Telephone406.329.3514
Contact Facsimile Telephone406.329.3198
Contact Electronic Mail Addressmailto:stevebrown@fs.fed.us?subject=VMap_Base
Hours of ServiceM_F, 8am-4pm (MST)
Contact Instructions
email preferred

Metadata Standard NameFGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata Standard VersionFGDC-STD-001-1998
Metadata Time Conventionlocal time

Metadata Extensions
Online Linkagehttp://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile NameESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata Extensions
Online Linkagehttp://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile NameESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata Extensions
Online Linkagehttp://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile NameESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata Extensions
Online Linkagehttp://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile NameESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata Extensions
Online Linkagehttp://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile NameESRI Metadata Profile
Metadata Extensions
Online Linkagehttp://www.esri.com/metadata/esriprof80.html
Profile NameESRI Metadata Profile

https://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/fseprd571230.html