Antipredator response data for captive, male red-wing blackbirds toward drones used as frightening devices

Metadata:

Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Egan, Conor C.
Originator: Blackwell, Bradley F.
Originator: Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
Originator: Klug, Page E.
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
Antipredator response data for captive, male red-wing blackbirds toward drones used as frightening devices
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Research Dataset Series
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: USDA, APHIS, WS National Wildlife Research Center
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2020-001
Description:
Abstract:
We evaluated the behavioral responses of individual Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) to 3 drone platforms: a predator model, a fixed-wing resembling an airplane, and a multirotor, approaching either head-on or overhead. This experiment was conducted in the late summer of 2017 at the Casselton Seed Farm in Caselton at North Dakota State University with male birds collected from Colorado. We used video cameras to record behavior of blackbirds in response to drone approaches and quantified the antipredator responses of blackbirds using video footage. This data publication contains the data and analysis code for Egan et al. (2020).
Purpose:
The study was designed to establish the degree to which the perception of risk by birds would vary between drone platforms relative to a predator model when flown at different approach types to inform use of drones as hazing tools.
Supplemental_Information:
Original metadata date was 04/01/2020. On 07/09/2020 metadata were updated to correct units for the variable "Speed" in both data files. The original units were listed as kilometers per hour, but this has been corrected to meters per second.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 20170807
Ending_Date: 20170912
Currentness_Reference:
Ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Description_of_Geographic_Extent:
The experiment was conducted at the North Dakota State University, Casselton Seed Farm in Caselton, North Dakota. The male, red-winged blackbirds were collected from Colorado and transferred to an aviary at the Red River Zoo in Fargo, North Dakota (March to October 2017).
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -97.237
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -97.234
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 46.884
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 46.879
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: biota
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: National Research & Development Taxonomy
Theme_Keyword: Ecology, Ecosystems, & Environment
Theme_Keyword: Wildlife (or Fauna)
Theme_Keyword: Birds
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: frightening devices
Theme_Keyword: hazing
Theme_Keyword: human-wildlife conflict
Theme_Keyword: UAS
Theme_Keyword: UAV
Theme_Keyword: visual deterrent
Theme_Keyword: Agelaius phoeniceus
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: North Dakota
Place_Keyword: United States
Taxonomy:
Keywords/Taxon:
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus:
None
Taxonomic_Keywords: vertebrates
Taxonomic_Keywords: single species
Taxonomic_System:
Classification_System/Authority:
Classification_System_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: ITIS
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
Integrated Taxonomic Information System
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: database
Other_Citation_Details:
Retrieved [March, 25, 2020]
Online_Linkage: https://www.itis.gov
Taxonomic_Procedures:
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Animalia
Applicable_Common_Name: Animal
Applicable_Common_Name: animaux
Applicable_Common_Name: animals
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subkingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Bilateria
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Deuterostomia
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Chordata
Applicable_Common_Name: cordés
Applicable_Common_Name: cordado
Applicable_Common_Name: chordates
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vertebrata
Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrado
Applicable_Common_Name: vertébrés
Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrates
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
Taxon_Rank_Value: Gnathostomata
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superclass
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tetrapoda
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aves
Applicable_Common_Name: Birds
Applicable_Common_Name: oiseaux
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Passeriformes
Applicable_Common_Name: Perching Birds
Applicable_Common_Name: passereaux
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Icteridae
Applicable_Common_Name: American Blackbirds
Applicable_Common_Name: New World Blackbirds
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Agelaius
Applicable_Common_Name: Red-winged Blackbirds
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Agelaius phoeniceus
Applicable_Common_Name: Red-winged Blackbird
Applicable_Common_Name: carouge à épaulettes
Applicable_Common_Name: Tordo sargento
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:

Egan, Conor C.; Blackwell, Bradley F.; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban; Klug, Page E. 2020. Antipredator response data for captive, male red-wing blackbirds toward drones used as frightening devices. Research Dataset Series. USDA, APHIS, WS National Wildlife Research Center. Ft. Collins, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2020-001
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Page Klug
Contact_Organization: USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
Contact_Position: Supervisory Wildlife Biologist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 4101 LaPorte Ave.
City: Fort Collins
State_or_Province: CO
Postal_Code: 80521
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 701-630-3776
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: Page.E.Klug@aphis.usda.gov
Data_Set_Credit:
This project was funded by 1) United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center (USDA-APHIS-WS NWRC; #7438-0020-CA; QA-2731) and 2) United States Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Airports and Airport Technology Research and Development Branch (via Interagency Agreement DTFACT-14-X-00007).
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Egan, Conor C.
Originator: Blackwell, Bradley F.
Originator: Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
Originator: Klug, Page E.
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
Testing a key assumption of using drones as frightening devices: do birds perceive drones as risky?
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: The Condor: Ornithological Applications
Issue_Identification: 122:1–15
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duaa014
Analytical_Tool:
Analytical_Tool_Description:
R is a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics.
Tool_Access_Information:
Online_Linkage: https://www.R-project.org/
Tool_Access_Instructions:
See website for more information.
Tool_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: R Core Team
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
R: A language and environment for statistical computing
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: software
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Vienna, Austria
Publisher: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
All of the cameras were syncronized so the bird behaviors are accurate relative to the time the drone passed above the enclosure/bird. Windspeed, temperature, and sound data are accurate relative to the accuracy of our equipment. Since we did not have a camera located on the visual observer, we do not have an accurate moment when the drone was launched, but estimated based on the moment the pilot, C.C.E, waved his arm to signal launch. There was a camera on the pilot, so that moment is visible. Therefore, the variable "approach time" is estimated to the best of our ability. Cameras also recorded at 60 frames per second, and each behavior is measured at a specific frame.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
not applicable
Completeness_Report:
We did not include trials where the behavioral response occurred during or after a piloting error (e.g., drone crashed or significantly deviated from the flight path; n = 7). For vigilance, we only considered birds that foraged from the perch a full 30 seconds (s). Thus, we omitted birds that did not forage for a full 30 s or perched in a manner that was not comparable to other birds (i.e. directly on the food tray as opposed to the perch). These values are "NA" in the CSV files. We are also missing a single value for ambient sound intensity, because the sound recorder was turned off during a single trial.
Lineage:
Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Field
Methodology_Description:
We conducted our experiment in an agricultural field at the North Dakota State University Agronomy Seed Farm in Casselton, ND, USA. We approached 87 blackbirds using 3 drone platforms: a drone modeling the form of an aerial raptor (USDA-APHIS-WS ATOC, Cedar City, UT, USA), a fixed-wing drone resembling an airplane (FT Explorer; Flight Test, New Philadelphia, OH, USA), and a multirotor (DJI Phantom 4 Pro; DJI, Shenzhen, China).

During trials, we recorded ambient temperature (12.3 – 34.7° Celsius [C]) and average wind speed (0.0 – 13.9 kilometers per hour [km hr-1]) using a Skymaster SM-28 weather meter (Speedtech Instruments, Great Falls, VA, USA) and ambient light intensity (115.01 – 883.5 micromole per square meter per second [µmol m-2 s-1]) with a Li-Cor (Lincoln, NE, USA) LI-250 Light Meter and LI-190SA Quantum Sensor. We conducted trials between August 07 and September 12, 2017, from 0720 to 1200. We food-deprived focal birds for 25-30 hours to motivate foraging during trials and tested 3-8 focal birds per day. Prior to the trials, we motivated foraging by securing sweetcorn (7 centimeters [cm]) to the food tray in the focal compartment, and we placed a perch directly behind the tray to control bird location during trials. Once the focal bird foraged for 30 seconds (s), after release into the enclosure, we performed a flight treatment. Five cameras (GoPro HERO5 Black; GoPro, San Mateo, CA, USA) recorded blackbird behavior and drone approach (60 frames s-1).

Our design comprised 2 independent factors: platform type and approach type. Platform type had 3 levels (i.e. predator model, fixed-wing, and multirotor). Approach type had 2 levels (i.e. head-on and overhead). Consequently, we had 6 treatments (1. head-on predator model, 2. overhead predator model, 3. head-on fixed-wing, 4. overhead fixed-wing, 5. head-on multirotor, and 6. overhead multirotor). In the head-on approach, the drone traveled at a direction and altitude simulating a collision course with the bird, but the drone flared upward ~6 meters (m) before reaching the enclosure. In the overhead approach, drones travelled ~5 m above the enclosure. After the drone passed over the enclosure, we circled the drone back to the pilot location for landing. We recorded the behavior of the birds during the drone approach (see Behavioral Response Metrics, below) and stopped recording 30 s after the focal bird resumed foraging.

We calculated ground speed for each flight using the time required for the drone to pass between cameras located 75 m apart along the approach path. We calculated approach time from the moment the drone accelerated forward to the moment it passed above the enclosure. We recorded ambient sound intensity using a digital sound meter (Model 407732, Extech Instruments Corp., Nashua, NH, USA) located at perch height next to the enclosure. The sound meter recorded a time-stamped sound (dB) reading every second. For each trial, we averaged 10 readings immediately prior to overpass and assumed the loudest reading occurred as the drone passed above the enclosure.

Behavioral Response Metrics

A single observer (C.C.E) measured the following behavioral responses: vigilance, individual alert time, whether a bird alarm-called, whether a bird initiated flight, flight-initiation time, and latency to resume foraging. We did not include trials where the behavioral response occurred during or after a piloting error (e.g., drone crashed or significantly deviated from the flight path; n = 7). We used BORIS (5.1.0) to analyze video footage. We recorded focal bird vigilance behavior for 30 s both immediately before and after drone flights. Specifically, we measured the proportion of time with the head-up (i.e. head above the horizontal plane of the body) during foraging bouts. We examined vigilance behavior at 0.10x playback speed (60 frames per second [fps]), and measurements began when a focal individual initiated foraging. For vigilance, we only considered birds that foraged from the perch a full 30 s. Thus, we omitted birds from analysis that did not forage for a full 30 s or perched in a manner that was not comparable to other birds (i.e. directly on the food tray as opposed to the perch).
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Egan, Conor C.
Originator: Blackwell, Bradley F.
Originator: Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
Originator: Klug, Page E.
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
Testing a key assumption of using drones as frightening devices: do birds perceive drones as risky?
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: The Condor: Ornithological Applications
Issue_Identification: 122:1–15
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duaa014
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Following video-recording, video was analyzed using BORIS software (https://www.boris.unito.it/). Data were analyzed using R (code included in the download package). See Egan et al. (2020) for details.
Process_Date: Unknown
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Below you will find a list and description of the files available in this data publication.

1). \Data\Eganetal_ArchivedDataset.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing antipredator blackbird behavior in response to drone approaches. This file can be used with the provided R code (RCode_Eganetal.r) to analyze the results. Variables include:

Treatment = Combination of platform type (Fixed-wing, Multirotor, Predator model), and approach type (Direct, Overhead) that each bird was exposed to during trials
Platform = Platform type that each bird was exposed to during trials (Fixed-wing, Multirotor, Predator model)
Trajectory = Approach type that each bird was exposed to during trials (Direct = head-on, Overhead)
Type = Fixed-wing and Predator model coded as "1", Multirotor coded as "0"
Latency = Latency to resume foraging (seconds)
LogLatency = Log transformed latency to resume foraging (seconds)
Speed = Drone speed per trial (meters per second)
Deprived = Length of time birds were food deprived prior to trials (hours)
Wind Origin = Direction wind originated from while being measured (W = west, E = east, N = north, S = south, and N/A = not applicable)
Wind = Wind origin combined to reflect headwind, downwind, crosswind, or tailwind (or none)
OriginCat = Direction wind originated from, converted to #s for coding (0 = none, 1 = northern headwind, 2 = northeastern headwind, 3 = eastern crosswind, 4 = southeastern tailwind, 5 = southern tailwind, 6 = southwestern tailwind, 7 = western crosswind, 8 = northwestern crosswind)
Windspeed = Windspeed (kilometers per hour)
Light = Ambient light intensity (micromoles per square meter per second [µmol m-2 s-1])
Temperature = Temperature (Celsius)
PUP1 = Proportion of time (30 seconds) birds spent head-up versus head-down prior to drone approaches
PUP2 = Proportion of time (30 seconds) birds spent head-up versus head-down following drone approaches
UPdiff = The difference between PUP1 and PUP2
Approach = Approach time (seconds) of the drone between launch and the time it passed above the enclosure
Sound = Ambient sound intensity (decibels) during trials
Alerttime = Individual alert time (seconds) per trial
LogAlert = Log transformed individual alert time (seconds) per trial
Flush = Did the bird flush the perch in response to drone flights? (1 = Yes, 0 = No)
Call = Did the bird alarm call in response to drone flights? (1 = Yes, 0 = No)
Flight = Individual flight-initiation time (seconds) per trial


2). \Data\Eganetal_MixedModelData.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing blackbird vigilance data collected before and after drone flight. This file can be used with the provided R code (RCode_Eganetal.r) to analyze the results. Variables include:

BirdID = Identification number assigned to each individual bird
Treatment = Combination of platform type (Fixed-wing, Multirotor, Predator model), and approach type (Direct, Overhead) that each bird was exposed to during trials
Platform = Platform type that each bird was exposed to during trials (Fixed-wing, Multirotor, Predator model)
Trajectory = Approach type that each bird was exposed to during trials (Direct = head-on, Overhead)
Speed = Drone speed per trial (meters per second)
Light = Ambient light intensity (µmol m-2 s-1)
Time = Time of measurement relative to drone flight (Before = before drone flight, After = after drone flight)
Vigilance = Proportion of time (30 seconds) birds spent head-up versus head-down


3). \Supplements\RCode_Eganetal.r: ASCII text file containing R code. This code can be used with provided CSV files to replicate results step by step as they appear in Egan et al. (2020).
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
Egan, Conor C.; Blackwell, Bradley F.; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban; Klug, Page E. 2020. Testing a key assumption of using drones as frightening devices: do birds perceive drones as risky? The Condor: Ornithological Applications 122:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duaa014
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Research and Development
Contact_Position: Research Data Archivist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 240 West Prospect Road
City: Fort Collins
State_or_Province: CO
Postal_Code: 80526
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: see Contact Instructions
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as of July 2020. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
Resource_Description: NWRC-RDS-2020-001
Distribution_Liability:
Metadata documents have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Unless otherwise stated, all data and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. However, neither the author, the Archive, nor any part of the federal government can assure the reliability or suitability of these data for a particular purpose. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed for a user's application of these data or related materials.

The metadata, data, or related materials may be updated without notification. If a user believes errors are present in the metadata, data or related materials, please use the information in (1) Identification Information: Point of Contact, (2) Metadata Reference: Metadata Contact, or (3) Distribution Information: Distributor to notify the author or the Archive of the issues.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ASCII
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
Format_Specification:
Comma-delimited ASCII text (CSV) and ASCII text
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 19.0
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2020-001
Fees: None
Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20200709
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Page Klug
Contact_Organization: USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
Contact_Position: Supervisory Wildlife Biologist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: USDA, APHIS, WS NWRC, North Dakota Field Station
Address: Biological Sciences, Dept. 2715
Address: North Dakota State University
Address: PO Box 6050
City: Fargo
State_or_Province: ND
Postal_Code: 58108-5060
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 701-630-3776
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: Page.E.Klug@aphis.usda.gov
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999
Back to Top