Antipredator response data for captive, male red-wing blackbirds toward drones used as frightening devices
Metadata:
-
Identification_Information:
-
-
Citation:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Egan, Conor C.
-
Originator: Blackwell, Bradley F.
-
Originator: Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
-
Originator: Klug, Page E.
-
Publication_Date: 2020
-
Title:
Antipredator response data for captive, male red-wing blackbirds toward drones used as frightening devices- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Research Dataset Series
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
- Publisher: USDA, APHIS, WS National Wildlife Research Center
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2020-001
-
Description:
-
-
Abstract:
- We evaluated the behavioral responses of individual Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) to 3 drone platforms: a predator model, a fixed-wing resembling an airplane, and a multirotor, approaching either head-on or overhead. This experiment was conducted in the late summer of 2017 at the Casselton Seed Farm in Caselton at North Dakota State University with male birds collected from Colorado. We used video cameras to record behavior of blackbirds in response to drone approaches and quantified the antipredator responses of blackbirds using video footage. This data publication contains the data and analysis code for Egan et al. (2020).
-
Purpose:
- The study was designed to establish the degree to which the perception of risk by birds would vary between drone platforms relative to a predator model when flown at different approach types to inform use of drones as hazing tools.
-
Supplemental_Information:
- Original metadata date was 04/01/2020. On 07/09/2020 metadata were updated to correct units for the variable "Speed" in both data files. The original units were listed as kilometers per hour, but this has been corrected to meters per second.
-
Time_Period_of_Content:
-
-
Time_Period_Information:
-
-
Range_of_Dates/Times:
-
-
Beginning_Date: 20170807
-
Ending_Date: 20170912
-
Currentness_Reference:
- Ground condition
-
Status:
-
-
Progress: Complete
-
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
-
Spatial_Domain:
-
-
Description_of_Geographic_Extent:
- The experiment was conducted at the North Dakota State University, Casselton Seed Farm in Caselton, North Dakota. The male, red-winged blackbirds were collected from Colorado and transferred to an aviary at the Red River Zoo in Fargo, North Dakota (March to October 2017).
-
Bounding_Coordinates:
-
-
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -97.237
-
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -97.234
-
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 46.884
-
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 46.879
-
Keywords:
-
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
-
Theme_Keyword: biota
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: National Research & Development Taxonomy
-
Theme_Keyword: Ecology, Ecosystems, & Environment
-
Theme_Keyword: Wildlife (or Fauna)
-
Theme_Keyword: Birds
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
-
Theme_Keyword: frightening devices
-
Theme_Keyword: hazing
-
Theme_Keyword: human-wildlife conflict
-
Theme_Keyword: UAS
-
Theme_Keyword: UAV
-
Theme_Keyword: visual deterrent
-
Theme_Keyword: Agelaius phoeniceus
-
Place:
-
-
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
-
Place_Keyword: North Dakota
-
Place_Keyword: United States
-
Taxonomy:
-
Keywords/Taxon:
-
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus:
- None
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: vertebrates
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: single species
-
Taxonomic_System:
-
Classification_System/Authority:
-
Classification_System_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: ITIS
-
Publication_Date: 2020
-
Title:
Integrated Taxonomic Information System- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: database
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Retrieved [March, 25, 2020]
- Online_Linkage: https://www.itis.gov
-
Taxonomic_Procedures:
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Animalia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Animal
-
Applicable_Common_Name: animaux
-
Applicable_Common_Name: animals
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subkingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Bilateria
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Deuterostomia
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Chordata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cordés
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cordado
-
Applicable_Common_Name: chordates
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vertebrata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrado
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertébrés
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrates
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Gnathostomata
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superclass
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tetrapoda
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aves
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Birds
-
Applicable_Common_Name: oiseaux
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Passeriformes
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Perching Birds
-
Applicable_Common_Name: passereaux
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Icteridae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American Blackbirds
-
Applicable_Common_Name: New World Blackbirds
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Agelaius
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Red-winged Blackbirds
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Agelaius phoeniceus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Red-winged Blackbird
-
Applicable_Common_Name: carouge à épaulettes
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Tordo sargento
-
Access_Constraints: None
-
Use_Constraints:
- These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:
Egan, Conor C.; Blackwell, Bradley F.; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban; Klug, Page E. 2020. Antipredator response data for captive, male red-wing blackbirds toward drones used as frightening devices. Research Dataset Series. USDA, APHIS, WS National Wildlife Research Center. Ft. Collins, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2020-001
-
Point_of_Contact:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Person_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Person: Page Klug
-
Contact_Organization: USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
-
Contact_Position: Supervisory Wildlife Biologist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 4101 LaPorte Ave.
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80521
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 701-630-3776
-
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
Page.E.Klug@aphis.usda.gov
-
Data_Set_Credit:
- This project was funded by 1) United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center (USDA-APHIS-WS NWRC; #7438-0020-CA; QA-2731) and 2) United States Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Airports and Airport Technology Research and Development Branch (via Interagency Agreement DTFACT-14-X-00007).
-
Cross_Reference:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Egan, Conor C.
-
Originator: Blackwell, Bradley F.
-
Originator: Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
-
Originator: Klug, Page E.
-
Publication_Date: 2020
-
Title:
Testing a key assumption of using drones as frightening devices: do birds perceive drones as risky?- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: The Condor: Ornithological Applications
- Issue_Identification: 122:1–15
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duaa014
-
Analytical_Tool:
-
Analytical_Tool_Description:
- R is a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics.
-
Tool_Access_Information:
-
Online_Linkage:
https://www.R-project.org/
-
Tool_Access_Instructions:
- See website for more information.
-
Tool_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: R Core Team
-
Publication_Date: 2020
-
Title:
R: A language and environment for statistical computing- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: software
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Vienna, Austria
- Publisher: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Back to Top
-
Data_Quality_Information:
-
-
Attribute_Accuracy:
-
-
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
- All of the cameras were syncronized so the bird behaviors are accurate relative to the time the drone passed above the enclosure/bird. Windspeed, temperature, and sound data are accurate relative to the accuracy of our equipment. Since we did not have a camera located on the visual observer, we do not have an accurate moment when the drone was launched, but estimated based on the moment the pilot, C.C.E, waved his arm to signal launch. There was a camera on the pilot, so that moment is visible. Therefore, the variable "approach time" is estimated to the best of our ability. Cameras also recorded at 60 frames per second, and each behavior is measured at a specific frame.
-
Logical_Consistency_Report:
- not applicable
-
Completeness_Report:
- We did not include trials where the behavioral response occurred during or after a piloting error (e.g., drone crashed or significantly deviated from the flight path; n = 7). For vigilance, we only considered birds that foraged from the perch a full 30 seconds (s). Thus, we omitted birds that did not forage for a full 30 s or perched in a manner that was not comparable to other birds (i.e. directly on the food tray as opposed to the perch). These values are "NA" in the CSV files. We are also missing a single value for ambient sound intensity, because the sound recorder was turned off during a single trial.
-
Lineage:
-
Methodology:
-
Methodology_Type: Field
-
Methodology_Description:
- We conducted our experiment in an agricultural field at the North Dakota State University Agronomy Seed Farm in Casselton, ND, USA. We approached 87 blackbirds using 3 drone platforms: a drone modeling the form of an aerial raptor (USDA-APHIS-WS ATOC, Cedar City, UT, USA), a fixed-wing drone resembling an airplane (FT Explorer; Flight Test, New Philadelphia, OH, USA), and a multirotor (DJI Phantom 4 Pro; DJI, Shenzhen, China).
During trials, we recorded ambient temperature (12.3 – 34.7° Celsius [C]) and average wind speed (0.0 – 13.9 kilometers per hour [km hr-1]) using a Skymaster SM-28 weather meter (Speedtech Instruments, Great Falls, VA, USA) and ambient light intensity (115.01 – 883.5 micromole per square meter per second [µmol m-2 s-1]) with a Li-Cor (Lincoln, NE, USA) LI-250 Light Meter and LI-190SA Quantum Sensor. We conducted trials between August 07 and September 12, 2017, from 0720 to 1200. We food-deprived focal birds for 25-30 hours to motivate foraging during trials and tested 3-8 focal birds per day. Prior to the trials, we motivated foraging by securing sweetcorn (7 centimeters [cm]) to the food tray in the focal compartment, and we placed a perch directly behind the tray to control bird location during trials. Once the focal bird foraged for 30 seconds (s), after release into the enclosure, we performed a flight treatment. Five cameras (GoPro HERO5 Black; GoPro, San Mateo, CA, USA) recorded blackbird behavior and drone approach (60 frames s-1).
Our design comprised 2 independent factors: platform type and approach type. Platform type had 3 levels (i.e. predator model, fixed-wing, and multirotor). Approach type had 2 levels (i.e. head-on and overhead). Consequently, we had 6 treatments (1. head-on predator model, 2. overhead predator model, 3. head-on fixed-wing, 4. overhead fixed-wing, 5. head-on multirotor, and 6. overhead multirotor). In the head-on approach, the drone traveled at a direction and altitude simulating a collision course with the bird, but the drone flared upward ~6 meters (m) before reaching the enclosure. In the overhead approach, drones travelled ~5 m above the enclosure. After the drone passed over the enclosure, we circled the drone back to the pilot location for landing. We recorded the behavior of the birds during the drone approach (see Behavioral Response Metrics, below) and stopped recording 30 s after the focal bird resumed foraging.
We calculated ground speed for each flight using the time required for the drone to pass between cameras located 75 m apart along the approach path. We calculated approach time from the moment the drone accelerated forward to the moment it passed above the enclosure. We recorded ambient sound intensity using a digital sound meter (Model 407732, Extech Instruments Corp., Nashua, NH, USA) located at perch height next to the enclosure. The sound meter recorded a time-stamped sound (dB) reading every second. For each trial, we averaged 10 readings immediately prior to overpass and assumed the loudest reading occurred as the drone passed above the enclosure.
Behavioral Response Metrics
A single observer (C.C.E) measured the following behavioral responses: vigilance, individual alert time, whether a bird alarm-called, whether a bird initiated flight, flight-initiation time, and latency to resume foraging. We did not include trials where the behavioral response occurred during or after a piloting error (e.g., drone crashed or significantly deviated from the flight path; n = 7). We used BORIS (5.1.0) to analyze video footage. We recorded focal bird vigilance behavior for 30 s both immediately before and after drone flights. Specifically, we measured the proportion of time with the head-up (i.e. head above the horizontal plane of the body) during foraging bouts. We examined vigilance behavior at 0.10x playback speed (60 frames per second [fps]), and measurements began when a focal individual initiated foraging. For vigilance, we only considered birds that foraged from the perch a full 30 s. Thus, we omitted birds from analysis that did not forage for a full 30 s or perched in a manner that was not comparable to other birds (i.e. directly on the food tray as opposed to the perch).
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Egan, Conor C.
-
Originator: Blackwell, Bradley F.
-
Originator: Fernández-Juricic, Esteban
-
Originator: Klug, Page E.
-
Publication_Date: 2020
-
Title:
Testing a key assumption of using drones as frightening devices: do birds perceive drones as risky?- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: The Condor: Ornithological Applications
- Issue_Identification: 122:1–15
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duaa014
-
Process_Step:
-
-
Process_Description:
- Following video-recording, video was analyzed using BORIS software (https://www.boris.unito.it/). Data were analyzed using R (code included in the download package). See Egan et al. (2020) for details.
-
Process_Date: Unknown
Back to Top
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
-
-
Overview_Description:
-
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
- Below you will find a list and description of the files available in this data publication.
1). \Data\Eganetal_ArchivedDataset.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing antipredator blackbird behavior in response to drone approaches. This file can be used with the provided R code (RCode_Eganetal.r) to analyze the results. Variables include:
Treatment = Combination of platform type (Fixed-wing, Multirotor, Predator model), and approach type (Direct, Overhead) that each bird was exposed to during trials
Platform = Platform type that each bird was exposed to during trials (Fixed-wing, Multirotor, Predator model)
Trajectory = Approach type that each bird was exposed to during trials (Direct = head-on, Overhead)
Type = Fixed-wing and Predator model coded as "1", Multirotor coded as "0"
Latency = Latency to resume foraging (seconds)
LogLatency = Log transformed latency to resume foraging (seconds)
Speed = Drone speed per trial (meters per second)
Deprived = Length of time birds were food deprived prior to trials (hours)
Wind Origin = Direction wind originated from while being measured (W = west, E = east, N = north, S = south, and N/A = not applicable)
Wind = Wind origin combined to reflect headwind, downwind, crosswind, or tailwind (or none)
OriginCat = Direction wind originated from, converted to #s for coding (0 = none, 1 = northern headwind, 2 = northeastern headwind, 3 = eastern crosswind, 4 = southeastern tailwind, 5 = southern tailwind, 6 = southwestern tailwind, 7 = western crosswind, 8 = northwestern crosswind)
Windspeed = Windspeed (kilometers per hour)
Light = Ambient light intensity (micromoles per square meter per second [µmol m-2 s-1])
Temperature = Temperature (Celsius)
PUP1 = Proportion of time (30 seconds) birds spent head-up versus head-down prior to drone approaches
PUP2 = Proportion of time (30 seconds) birds spent head-up versus head-down following drone approaches
UPdiff = The difference between PUP1 and PUP2
Approach = Approach time (seconds) of the drone between launch and the time it passed above the enclosure
Sound = Ambient sound intensity (decibels) during trials
Alerttime = Individual alert time (seconds) per trial
LogAlert = Log transformed individual alert time (seconds) per trial
Flush = Did the bird flush the perch in response to drone flights? (1 = Yes, 0 = No)
Call = Did the bird alarm call in response to drone flights? (1 = Yes, 0 = No)
Flight = Individual flight-initiation time (seconds) per trial
2). \Data\Eganetal_MixedModelData.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing blackbird vigilance data collected before and after drone flight. This file can be used with the provided R code (RCode_Eganetal.r) to analyze the results. Variables include:
BirdID = Identification number assigned to each individual bird
Treatment = Combination of platform type (Fixed-wing, Multirotor, Predator model), and approach type (Direct, Overhead) that each bird was exposed to during trials
Platform = Platform type that each bird was exposed to during trials (Fixed-wing, Multirotor, Predator model)
Trajectory = Approach type that each bird was exposed to during trials (Direct = head-on, Overhead)
Speed = Drone speed per trial (meters per second)
Light = Ambient light intensity (µmol m-2 s-1)
Time = Time of measurement relative to drone flight (Before = before drone flight, After = after drone flight)
Vigilance = Proportion of time (30 seconds) birds spent head-up versus head-down
3). \Supplements\RCode_Eganetal.r: ASCII text file containing R code. This code can be used with provided CSV files to replicate results step by step as they appear in Egan et al. (2020).
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
- Egan, Conor C.; Blackwell, Bradley F.; Fernández-Juricic, Esteban; Klug, Page E. 2020. Testing a key assumption of using drones as frightening devices: do birds perceive drones as risky? The Condor: Ornithological Applications 122:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/condor/duaa014
Back to Top
-
Distribution_Information:
-
-
Distributor:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Organization_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Research and Development
-
Contact_Position: Research Data Archivist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 240 West Prospect Road
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80526
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: see Contact Instructions
-
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as of July 2020. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
-
Resource_Description: NWRC-RDS-2020-001
-
Distribution_Liability:
- Metadata documents have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Unless otherwise stated, all data and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. However, neither the author, the Archive, nor any part of the federal government can assure the reliability or suitability of these data for a particular purpose. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed for a user's application of these data or related materials.
The metadata, data, or related materials may be updated without notification. If a user believes errors are present in the metadata, data or related materials, please use the information in (1) Identification Information: Point of Contact, (2) Metadata Reference: Metadata Contact, or (3) Distribution Information: Distributor to notify the author or the Archive of the issues.
-
Standard_Order_Process:
-
-
Digital_Form:
-
-
Digital_Transfer_Information:
-
-
Format_Name: ASCII
-
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
-
Format_Specification:
- Comma-delimited ASCII text (CSV) and ASCII text
-
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 19.0
-
Digital_Transfer_Option:
-
-
Online_Option:
-
-
Computer_Contact_Information:
-
-
Network_Address:
-
-
Network_Resource_Name:
https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2020-001
-
Fees: None
Back to Top
-
Metadata_Reference_Information:
-
-
Metadata_Date: 20200709
-
Metadata_Contact:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Person_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Person: Page Klug
-
Contact_Organization: USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
-
Contact_Position: Supervisory Wildlife Biologist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: USDA, APHIS, WS NWRC, North Dakota Field Station
-
Address: Biological Sciences, Dept. 2715
-
Address: North Dakota State University
-
Address: PO Box 6050
-
City: Fargo
-
State_or_Province: ND
-
Postal_Code: 58108-5060
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 701-630-3776
-
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
Page.E.Klug@aphis.usda.gov
-
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
-
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999
Back to Top