Management data of feral swine removals from Mingo National Wildlife Refuge, Missouri, USA from 2015-2019
Metadata:
-
Identification_Information:
-
-
Citation:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Davis, Amy J.
-
Originator: Farrar, Randy O.
-
Originator: Jump, Brad
-
Originator: Hall, Parker T.
-
Originator: Guerrant, Travis L.
-
Originator: Pepin, Kim M.
-
Publication_Date: 2022
-
Title:
Management data of feral swine removals from Mingo National Wildlife Refuge, Missouri, USA from 2015-2019- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Research Dataset Series
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
- Publisher: USDA, APHIS, WS National Wildlife Research Center
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2022-001
-
Description:
-
-
Abstract:
- Feral swine (Sus scrofa) are invasive in North America and are actively managed to reduce human-wildlife conflict and damage to agriculture, natural resources, and personal property. This data package contains the data collected during feral swine removal management activities at the Mingo National Wildlife Refuge in Missouri. Removal data for feral swine include the date, location, method of removal (i.e., aerial gunning, trapping, and ground shooting), number of animals removed, effort employed, and a site designation number. The effort is dependent on the method of removal: number of hours in the helicopter for aerial gunning, number of trap nights for trapping, and number of ground shooting events for ground shooting. The location information has been modified to remove specific locations to avoid violating privacy issues while retaining the relative spatial relationships of the points. The refuge was split into three sites for analysis purposes based on the geography of the refuge.
-
Purpose:
- The data were collected as part Wildlife Services management activities.
-
Supplemental_Information:
- For more information about this study and these data, see Davis et al. (2022).
Data were originally published on 02/15/2022. On 04/25/2023 metadata updates included citation for newly published article.
-
Time_Period_of_Content:
-
-
Time_Period_Information:
-
-
Range_of_Dates/Times:
-
-
Beginning_Date: 2015
-
Ending_Date: 2019
-
Currentness_Reference:
- Ground condition
-
Status:
-
-
Progress: Complete
-
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As Needed
-
Spatial_Domain:
-
-
Description_of_Geographic_Extent:
- Mingo National Wildlife Refuge is located in southeastern Missouri. The refuge comprises of roughly 87 square kilometers of bottomland hardwood forest, cypress-tupelo swamp, marsh, and upland forest ecosystems.
-
Bounding_Coordinates:
-
-
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -90.44
-
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -90.00
-
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 37.10
-
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 36.91
-
Bounding_Altitudes:
-
Altitude_Minimum: 340
-
Altitude_Maximum: 405
-
Altitude_Distance_Units: meters
-
Keywords:
-
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
-
Theme_Keyword: biota
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: National Research & Development Taxonomy
-
Theme_Keyword: Wildlife (or Fauna)
-
Theme_Keyword: Mammals
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
-
Theme_Keyword: longitudinal model
-
Theme_Keyword: invasive species management
-
Theme_Keyword: multi-method framework
-
Theme_Keyword: removal sampling
-
Theme_Keyword: Sus scrofa
-
Place:
-
-
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
-
Place_Keyword: Missouri
-
Taxonomy:
-
Keywords/Taxon:
-
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus:
- None
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: single species
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: mammals
-
Taxonomic_System:
-
Classification_System/Authority:
-
Classification_System_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: ITIS
-
Publication_Date: 2022
-
Title:
Integrated Taxonomic Information System- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: on-line database
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Retrieved [February, 10, 2022]; CC0
- Online_Linkage: https://www.itis.gov
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.5066/F7KH0KBK
-
Taxonomic_Procedures:
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Animalia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Animal
-
Applicable_Common_Name: animaux
-
Applicable_Common_Name: animals
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subkingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Bilateria
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Deuterostomia
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Chordata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cordés
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cordado
-
Applicable_Common_Name: chordates
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vertebrata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrado
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertébrés
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrates
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Gnathostomata
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superclass
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tetrapoda
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Mammalia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mammifères
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mamífero
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mammals
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Theria
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraclass
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Eutheria
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Artiodactyla
-
Applicable_Common_Name: artiodactyls
-
Applicable_Common_Name: porco do mato
-
Applicable_Common_Name: veado
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cloven-hoofed ungulates
-
Applicable_Common_Name: even-toed ungulates
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Suidae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hogs
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pigs
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subfamily
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Suinae
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Tribe
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Suini
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pigs
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sus scrofa
-
Applicable_Common_Name: wild boar
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pig
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pig (feral)
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Wild Boar
-
Access_Constraints: None
-
Use_Constraints:
- These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:
Davis, Amy J.; Farrar, Randy O.; Jump, Brad; Hall, Parker T.; Guerrant, Travis L.; Pepin, Kim M. 2022. Management data of feral swine removals from Mingo National Wildlife Refuge, Missouri, USA from 2015-2019. Research Dataset Series. USDA, APHIS, WS National Wildlife Research Center. Ft. Collins, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2022-001
-
Point_of_Contact:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Person_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Person: Amy Douglas
-
Contact_Organization: USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
-
Contact_Position: Computational Biologist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 4101 LaPorte Ave
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80521
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 970-266-6313
-
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
amy.j.davis@usda.gov
-
Data_Set_Credit:
- This project was funded by United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center.
Author Information:
Amy J. Davis
National Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Fort Collins, CO
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4962-9753
Randy O. Farrar
Wildlife Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Puxico, MO
Brad Jump
Wildlife Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Marshfield, MO
Parker T. Hall
Wildlife Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Gainesville, FL
Travis L. Guerrant
Wildlife Services, Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Columbia, MO
Kim M. Pepin
National Wildlife Research Center, Wildlife Services, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA, Fort Collins, CO
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9931-8312
-
Cross_Reference:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Davis, Amy J.
-
Originator: Farrar, Randy O.
-
Originator: Jump, Brad
-
Originator: Hall, Parker T.
-
Originator: Guerrant, Travis L.
-
Originator: Pepin, Kim M.
-
Publication_Date: 2022
-
Title:
An efficient method of evaluating multiple concurrent management actions on invasive populations- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Ecological Applications
- Issue_Identification: 32(6): e2623
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2623
Back to Top
-
Data_Quality_Information:
-
-
Attribute_Accuracy:
-
-
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
- Location uncertainty is within 10 meters.
-
Logical_Consistency_Report:
- Data checking on sample locations and collection methods was conducted by field personnel and secondarily by Wildlife Services personnel.
-
Completeness_Report:
- All Sus scrofa removed by Wildlife Services within the study area during the study period were included in these data.
-
Lineage:
-
Methodology:
-
Methodology_Type: Field
-
Methodolgy_Identifier:
-
Methodolgy_Keyword_Thesaurus:
- None
-
Methodology_Keyword: aerial gunning
-
Methodology_Keyword: corral trapping
-
Methodology_Keyword: box trapping
-
Methodology_Keyword: ground shooting
-
Methodology_Description:
- Wildlife Services are tasked with managing damage from feral swine (Sus scrofa). To that end, extensive efforts to remove feral swine are used during the course of normal operations. Removal efforts conducted on Mingo National Wildlife Refuge (Mingo NWR) from December 2015 to September 2019 included aerial gunning, trapping, and ground shooting. Management removals were conducted across the entire refuge; however, the refuge was subset into 3 different sites for analysis purposes. These sites were based on the geography of the refuge (eastern, central, and western sites).
As part of the management program at Mingo NWR, we recorded the following data at these three sites: date of management actions, location (latitude/longitude), type of removal event (e.g., aerial gunning, trapping, ground shooting), number of animals removed, and the effort involved (e.g., number of hours in a helicopter, number of trap nights, number of hours ground shooting). This dataset includes all removal events within the refuge from December 2015 to September 2019. Removal events have continued on the refuge after September 2019.
Davis et al. (2022) includes additional information about these data.
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Davis, Amy J.
-
Originator: Farrar, Randy O.
-
Originator: Jump, Brad
-
Originator: Hall, Parker T.
-
Originator: Guerrant, Travis L.
-
Originator: Pepin, Kim M.
-
Publication_Date: 2022
-
Title:
An efficient method of evaluating multiple concurrent management actions on invasive populations- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Ecological Applications
- Issue_Identification: 32(6): e2623
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2623
-
Process_Step:
-
-
Process_Description:
- The location information was adjusted to center around 0 degrees latitude and 0 degrees longitude to avoid disclosing any landowner information.
-
Process_Date: Unknown
Back to Top
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
-
-
Overview_Description:
-
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
- Below you will find a list and description of the files included in this data publication.
DATA
\Data\MingoData.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing feral swine removal data from the Mingo National Wildlife Refuge (Mingo NWR) from 2015 to 2019.
Variables include:
Date = date of removal event (mm/dd/yyyy)
Longitude = adjusted longitude of removal event
Latitude = adjusted latitude of removal event
Take = number of animals removed during removal event
Effort = amount of effort used during removal event
If method is aerial, then effort is the number of hours in a helicopter.
If method is shooting, then effort is the number of hours ground shooting.
If method is trapping, then effort is the number of trap nights.
Methods = removal method used during removal event (aerial, shooting, trap)
Site = Site number for removal event (Mingo NWR was split into 3 sites for this study: 1 = southwestern part of the refuge, 2 = central part of the refuge, and 3 = northeastern part of the refuge. A plot showing these removal locations is included in the data package: \Supplements\sitecolsplotMingo.jpg.)
SUPPLEMENTAL FILE
\Supplements\sitecolsplotMingo.jpg: Joint Photographic Expert Group file containing a plot of removal locations of feral swine (Sus scrofa) at Mingo NWR. (Points are color coded by site number.)
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
- Davis, Amy J.; Farrar, Randy O.; Jump, Brad; Hall, Parker T.; Guerrant, Travis L.; Pepin, Kim M. 2022. An efficient method of evaluating multiple concurrent management actions on invasive populations. Ecological Applications. 32(6): e2623. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2623
Back to Top
-
Distribution_Information:
-
-
Distributor:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Organization_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Research and Development
-
Contact_Position: Research Data Archivist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 240 West Prospect Road
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80526
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: see Contact Instructions
-
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as of February 2022. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
-
Resource_Description: NWRC-RDS-2022-001
-
Distribution_Liability:
- Metadata documents have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Unless otherwise stated, all data and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. However, neither the author, the Archive, nor any part of the federal government can assure the reliability or suitability of these data for a particular purpose. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed for a user's application of these data or related materials.
The metadata, data, or related materials may be updated without notification. If a user believes errors are present in the metadata, data or related materials, please use the information in (1) Identification Information: Point of Contact, (2) Metadata Reference: Metadata Contact, or (3) Distribution Information: Distributor to notify the author or the Archive of the issues.
-
Standard_Order_Process:
-
-
Digital_Form:
-
-
Digital_Transfer_Information:
-
-
Format_Name: CSV
-
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
-
Format_Specification:
- Comma-separated values file
-
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 19.0
-
Digital_Transfer_Option:
-
-
Online_Option:
-
-
Computer_Contact_Information:
-
-
Network_Address:
-
-
Network_Resource_Name:
https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2022-001
-
Fees: None
Back to Top
-
Metadata_Reference_Information:
-
-
Metadata_Date: 20230425
-
Metadata_Contact:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Person_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Person: Amy Douglas
-
Contact_Organization: USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
-
Contact_Position: Computational Biologist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 4101 LaPorte Ave
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80521
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 970-266-6313
-
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
amy.j.davis@usda.gov
-
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
-
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999
Back to Top