Data for sound comparisons of auditory frightening devices and antipredator responses of nuisance blackbirds
Metadata:
-
Identification_Information:
-
-
Citation:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Duttenhefner, Jessica L.
-
Originator: Klug, Page E.
-
Publication_Date: 2024
-
Title:
Data for sound comparisons of auditory frightening devices and antipredator responses of nuisance blackbirds- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Research Dataset Series
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
- Publisher: USDA, APHIS, WS National Wildlife Research Center
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2024-002
-
Description:
-
-
Abstract:
- In August 2022, at a recently harvested agricultural field in Foster County, North Dakota, we collected sound attenuation data within the hearing range of blackbirds (Icteridae) for a propane cannon, rifle and shotgun within 500 meters of the detonation point. We also examined the responses (i.e., relaxed, vigilant, startled) of 32 red-winged blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus) and 32 brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) to blasts when placed 15–495 meters from a cannon. The August 2020 study took place on flat terrain in a harvested agricultural field with no vegetative barriers at the North Dakota State University Agronomy Seed Farm in Casselton, North Dakota. Birds were placed in small, individual cages (covered to minimize visual stimuli) and we evaluated startle responses to the impulsive sound of the cannon with two experiments: 1) incremental, where we exposed birds to a series of blasts at decreasing distances and 2) random assignment, where we randomly assigned birds a distance and exposed them to four cannon blasts in quick succession. This data publication contains the data from both studies and the R code used to analyze these data.
-
Purpose:
- The study was designed to measure sound attenuation of three tools used as frightening devices (i.e., propane cannon, rifle, and shotgun) at frequencies within bird hearing capabilities and to assess responses of birds to a propane cannon blast as a function of distance, and how responses change with repeated blasts.
-
Supplemental_Information:
- For more information about this study and these data, see Duttenhefner and Klug (2024).
These data were published on 08/02/2024. On 10/24/2024, metadata was updated to include reference to newly published article.
-
Time_Period_of_Content:
-
-
Time_Period_Information:
-
-
Multiple_Dates/Times:
-
-
Single_Date/Time:
-
-
Calendar_Date: 202008
-
Single_Date/Time:
-
-
Calendar_Date: 202208
-
Currentness_Reference:
- Ground condition
-
Status:
-
-
Progress: Complete
-
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
-
Spatial_Domain:
-
-
Description_of_Geographic_Extent:
- We conducted the tool comparison study in a recently harvested agricultural field in Foster County, North Dakota, USA. We conducted the behavioral study in a recently harvested agricultural field in Cass County, North Dakota, USA.
-
Bounding_Coordinates:
-
-
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -98.87056
-
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -97.234750
-
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 47.514444
-
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 46.883543
-
Keywords:
-
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
-
Theme_Keyword: biota
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: National Research & Development Taxonomy
-
Theme_Keyword: Ecology, Ecosystems, & Environment
-
Theme_Keyword: Wildlife (or Fauna)
-
Theme_Keyword: Birds
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
-
Theme_Keyword: acoustics
-
Theme_Keyword: frightening devices
-
Theme_Keyword: avian hearing
-
Theme_Keyword: hazing
-
Theme_Keyword: sensory ecology
-
Theme_Keyword: vertebrate pests
-
Theme_Keyword: wildlife damage management
-
Place:
-
-
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
-
Place_Keyword: North Dakota
-
Taxonomy:
-
Keywords/Taxon:
-
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus:
- None
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: multiple species
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: vertebrates
-
Taxonomic_System:
-
Classification_System/Authority:
-
Classification_System_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: ITIS
-
Publication_Date: 2024
-
Title:
Integrated Taxonomic Information System- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: on-line database
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Retrieved [July, 29, 2024]; CC0
- Online_Linkage: https://www.itis.gov
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.5066/F7KH0KBK
-
Taxonomic_Procedures:
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Animalia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Animal
-
Applicable_Common_Name: animaux
-
Applicable_Common_Name: animals
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subkingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Bilateria
-
Applicable_Common_Name: triploblasts
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Deuterostomia
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Phylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Chordata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cordés
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cordado
-
Applicable_Common_Name: chordates
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subphylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vertebrata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrado
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertébrés
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vertebrates
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infraphylum
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Gnathostomata
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superclass
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tetrapoda
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aves
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Birds
-
Applicable_Common_Name: oiseaux
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Passeriformes
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Perching Birds
-
Applicable_Common_Name: passereaux
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Icteridae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American Blackbirds
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Orioles
-
Applicable_Common_Name: New World Blackbirds
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Agelaius
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Red-winged Blackbirds
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Agelaius phoeniceus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Red-winged Blackbird
-
Applicable_Common_Name: carouge à épaulettes
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Tordo sargento
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Molothrus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Cowbirds
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Molothrus ater
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Tordo cabeza café
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Brown-headed Cowbird
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vacher à tête brune
-
Access_Constraints: None
-
Use_Constraints:
- These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:
Duttenhefner, Jessica L.; Klug, Page E. 2024. Data for sound comparisons of auditory frightening devices and antipredator responses of nuisance blackbirds. Research Dataset Series. USDA, APHIS, WS National Wildlife Research Center. Ft. Collins, Colorado. https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2024-002
-
Point_of_Contact:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Organization_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Organization: USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
-
Contact_Person: Page Klug
-
Contact_Position: Supervisory Research Wildlife Biologist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 4101 LaPorte Ave.
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80521
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 701-630-3776
-
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
page.e.klug@usda.gov
-
Data_Set_Credit:
- This project was funded by the United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC; via cooperative agreement, #7438-0020-CA, between North Dakota State University and NWRC; QA-3110).
Author Information:
Jessica L. Duttenhefner
North Dakota State University
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2672-8421
Page E. Klug
USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0836-3901
-
Cross_Reference:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Duttenhefner, Jessica L.
-
Originator: Klug, Page E.
-
Publication_Date: 2024
-
Title:
Effective range of auditory frightening devices based on hearing capabilities and antipredator responses of nuisance blackbirds- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Wildlife Society Bulletin
- Issue_Identification: e1549
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1549
-
Analytical_Tool:
-
Analytical_Tool_Description:
- R is a language and environment for statistical computing and graphics.
-
Tool_Access_Information:
-
Online_Linkage:
https://www.R-project.org/
-
Tool_Access_Instructions:
- See website
-
Tool_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: R Core Team
-
Publication_Date: 2024
-
Title:
R: A language and environment for statistical computing- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: software
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Vienna, Austria
- Publisher: R Foundation for Statistical Computing
- Online_Linkage: https://www.R-project.org/
Back to Top
-
Data_Quality_Information:
-
-
Attribute_Accuracy:
-
-
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
- All of the camera footage contained visual and audio playback; thus, bird behaviors were accurate relative to the time of the propane cannon detonation. Wind speed, temperature, and sound data are accurate relative to the accuracy of our equipment. All behavioral classifications were made by a single observer (JLD). Experimental enclosures were placed on the ground and covered with a white cloth to allow light to penetrate but eliminate visual stimuli that may cause behavioral responses unrelated to the propane cannon detonation. We do not know past exposure to auditory frightening devices. However, scare devices are mainly used in the fall, and we captured the birds in the winter and summer. Thus, if exposure occurred, it would have been approximately a year preceding the study.
-
Logical_Consistency_Report:
- The data are logically consistent. The consistency was verified as part of the quality assurance that occurred during data analysis.
-
Completeness_Report:
- Technological difficulties associated with the GoPro cameras (battery/SD card issues) occasionally caused missing or corrupt video files. When we reviewed videos to categorize behavioral response in the incremental approach, missing video files led to unknown behavioral response (n = 140). These are recorded as "NA" in the CSV data files.
-
Lineage:
-
Methodology:
-
Methodology_Type: Field
-
Methodolgy_Identifier:
-
Methodolgy_Keyword_Thesaurus:
- None
-
Methodology_Keyword: captive
-
Methodology_Keyword: field
-
Methodology_Description:
- SOUND ATTENUATION OF AUDITORY SCARING DEVICES (\Data\Duttenhefner_Klug_Sound.csv)
We collected sound attenuation data for three common frightening devices: a propane cannon (Scare-away M-8 Multi-bang Cannon; Reed-Joseph International Co., Greenville, Mississippi, USA), rifle (Winchester 3X3 12-gauge, barrel 26 in, Winchester Repeating Arms, Morgan, Utah, USA; ammo: HSM Varmint .233 Rem Ammunition 55 grain Hornady V-Max 3200 fps), and shotgun (LAR-15 .233, Rock River Arms Inc., Colona, Illinois, USA; ammo: Rio Game Load Blue Steel 2 3/4 Max 1325.1 6 shot) on 02 August 2022, from 0900–1130 hours. To record sound data, we established 33 locations, 15–495 meters (m) away from the detonation point of the scaring devices, at a recently harvested agricultural field in Foster County, North Dakota, USA. The propane cannon, rifle, and shotgun were all detonated with the muzzle at the same angle and height (1.66 m). We used a sound analyzer meter (Soundtek ST-105D; Tenmars Ltd., Neihu, Taipei, Taiwan), capable of detecting frequencies between 16 hertz (Hz) and 16 kilohertz (kHz), to collect sound intensity (decibels [dB]) at three frequencies relevant to bird hearing (8, 2, and 0.5 kHz). We set the sound meter to collect an instantaneous reading (Linst) of sound intensity at the moment of blast at each distance.
BEHAVIORAL TRIALS IN RESPONSE TO PROPANE CANNON (\Data\Duttenhefner_Klug_Incremental.csv and \Data\Duttenhefner_Klug_RandomAssignment.csv)
Study Species and Experimental Arena
This study included 32 male red-winged blackbirds (RWBL) and 32 male brown-headed cowbirds (BHCO). Twenty-two of the RWBL were captured in Colorado, USA and the remaining birds were captured at Alice Waterfowl Production Area (WPA) in North Dakota, USA using Potter-walk-in traps and modified Australian crow traps. Following capture, we transported birds to housing at the Red River Zoo, North Dakota State University (NDSU) Conservation Sciences Aviary in Fargo, North Dakota, USA, where they were housed communally in cages (2.4 x 2.4 x 2.4 m) within a covered outdoor aviary from May–August 2020.
The study arena was located on flat terrain in a harvested agricultural field with no vegetative barriers at the NDSU Agronomy Seed Farm in Casselton, North Dakota, USA, approximately 30 minutes from the aviary. We transported birds to the study arena inside Potter walk-in traps, in visual but not physical contact with each other. We kept the cages inside a climate-controlled vehicle during transport and while awaiting inclusion in the trials. The transport vehicle was parked away from the experimental arena and birds could not hear the propane cannon before inclusion in the experiment.
Data Collection
We conducted trials evaluating the behavioral response of blackbirds to a propane cannon between 19–27 August 2020, from 0700–1500 hours. Each experimental cage (61 x 61 x 46 centimeters) was occupied by one bird and equipped with a wooden dowel for perching, water dish, corn-on-the-cob, and two cameras (GoPro HERO5 Black; GoPro, San Mateo, CA, USA) to record behavior. Birds were acclimated to the cage for approximately 30 minutes prior to the first cannon blast for both experimental approaches.
We used two approaches to elicit antipredator behavioral responses: 1) incremental, where individual birds were exposed to a series of 33 propane cannon detonations at decreasing distances (from 495–15 m) and 2) random assignment, where individual birds were randomly assigned to distances. In the random assignment, we detonated a propane cannon four times within 15–255 m of the cages (i.e., Series 1). We waited an average 13.12 ± 6.3 minutes (10.1–24.4) for birds to recover, and again detonated a propane cannon four times within 255–495 m of the cages (i.e., Series 2).
In the incremental approach, we moved the cannon closer to the birds at increments of 15 m with a single cannon blast at each distance. We detonated the cannon after the individual bird had returned to a relaxed state (e.g., foraging, preening, loafing, scanning), witnessed using the ‘live preview’ feature of the GoPro camera. A single observer (JLD) categorized the change in bird behavior immediately after (within 1 millisecond) detonation of the propane cannon. We classified the avian responses as follows: 0 – Relaxed (foraging, preening, loafing, or occasional scanning); 1 – Vigilant (sudden head up, increased head movements, or neck extension); or 2 - Startled (feather compression, body flinch, wing flap, or departure from perch).
For more information about these data, see Duttenhefner and Klug (2024).
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Duttenhefner, Jessica L.
-
Originator: Klug, Page E.
-
Publication_Date: 2024
-
Title:
Effective range of auditory frightening devices based on hearing capabilities and antipredator responses of nuisance blackbirds- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Wildlife Society Bulletin
- Issue_Identification: e1549
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1549
Back to Top
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
-
-
Overview_Description:
-
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
- Below you will find a list and description of the files included in this data publication.
VARIABLE DESCRIPTION FILE (1)
1. \Data\_variable_descriptions.csv: Comma-separated values (CSV) file containing a list and description of variables found in the CSV file. (A description of these variables is also provided in the metadata below.)
Columns include:
Filename = Name of data file
Variable = Name of variable
Units = Units (if applicable)
Precision = Precision (if applicable)
Description = Description of variable
DATA FILES (3)
1. \Data\Duttenhefner_Klug_Incremental.csv: CSV file containing antipredator blackbird behavior in response to a series of propane cannon detonations at decreasing distances. This file can be used with the provided R code (\Supplements\Duttenhefner_Klug_2024_WSB.R) to analyze the results as reported in Duttenhefner and Klug (2024).
Variables include:
Date = Date of trial (MM/DD/YYYY)
Distance = Distance from bird to the propane cannon detonation (meters [m])
Species = Bird species used during behavioral trials (RWBL = red-winged blackbirds, BHCO = brown-headed cowbirds)
Bird_ID = Unique identification number for each bird used in behavioral trials
Response_Category = Categorized behavior (Foraging, Preening, Loafing, Scanning, Sudden head up, Increased rate of head movement, Neck extension, Feather compression, Body flinch, Wing flap, or Departure from perch, NA = unknown behavioral response due to missing video file)
Temp = Ambient temperature (degrees Celsius)
Wind_avg = Average wind speed (meters per second)
2. \Data\Duttenhefner_Klug_RandomAssignment.csv: CSV file containing antipredator blackbird behavior in response to two series of four propane cannon detonations at randomly assigned distances. This file can be used with the provided R code (\Supplements\Duttenhefner_Klug_2024_WSB.R) to analyze the results as reported in Duttenhefner and Klug (2024).
Variables include:
Date = Date of trial (MM/DD/YYYY)
Distance = Distance from bird to the propane cannon detonation (meters)
Species = Bird species used during behavioral trials (RWBL = red-winged blackbirds, BHCO = brown-headed cowbirds)
Bird_ID = Unique identification number for each bird used in behavioral trials
Series = Cannon blast series (1 = close blast set [15-255 m], 2 = far blast set [255-495 m])
Response_1 = Categorized behavior in response to 1st cannon blast (Foraging, Preening, Loafing, Scanning, Sudden head up, Increased rate of head movement, Neck extension, Feather compression, Body flinch, Wing flap, or Departure from perch)
Response_2 = Categorized behavior in response to 2nd cannon blast (Foraging, Preening, Loafing, Scanning, Sudden head up, Increased rate of head movement, Neck extension, Feather compression, Body flinch, Wing flap, or Departure from perch)
Response_3 = Categorized behavior in response to 3rd cannon blast (Foraging, Preening, Loafing, Scanning, Sudden head up, Increased rate of head movement, Neck extension, Feather compression, Body flinch, Wing flap, or Departure from perch)
Response_4 = Categorized behavior in response to 4rd cannon blast (Foraging, Preening, Loafing, Scanning, Sudden head up, Increased rate of head movement, Neck extension, Feather compression, Body flinch, Wing flap, or Departure from perch)
Temp = Ambient temperature (degrees Celsius)
Wind_avg = Average wind speed (meters per second)
3. \Data\Duttenhefner_Klug_Sound.csv: CSV file containing sound intensity data for three physical frightening devices: propane cannon, rifle, and shotgun. The sound from each tool was measured for three frequencies (8 kilohertz [kHz], 2 kHz, 0.5 kHz) at 33 locations, from 15 - 495 meters, using a sound analyzer meter (Soundtek ST-105D). This file can be used with the provided R code (\Supplements\Duttenhefner_Klug_2024_WSB.R) to analyze the results as reported in Duttenhefner and Klug (2024).
Variables include:
Date = Date of trial (MM/DD/YYYY)
Distance = Distance from sound meter to the tool detonation point (meters)
Tool = Auditory scaring tool used in sound comparison (rifle, shotgun, propane cannon)
f_8kHz = Sound intensity reading from sound meter at frequency of 8 kHz (decibels)
f_2kHz = Sound intensity reading from sound meter at frequency of 2 kHz (decibels)
f_0.5kHz = Sound intensity reading from sound meter at frequency of 0.5 kHz (decibels)
SUPPLEMENTAL FILES (1)
1. \Supplements\Duttenhefner_Klug_2024_WSB.R: Text file containing R code that when paired with the data files included in this package can be used to replicate the results, step by step, as they appear in Duttenhefner and Klug (2024).
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
- Duttenhefner, Jessica L.; Klug, Page E. 2024. Effective range of auditory frightening devices based on hearing capabilities and antipredator responses of nuisance blackbirds. Wildlife Society Bulletin. e1549. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1549
Back to Top
-
Distribution_Information:
-
-
Distributor:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Organization_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Research and Development
-
Contact_Position: Research Data Archivist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 240 West Prospect Road
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80526
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: see Contact Instructions
-
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as of October 2024. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
-
Resource_Description: NWRC-RDS-2024-002
-
Distribution_Liability:
- Metadata documents have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Unless otherwise stated, all data and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. However, neither the author, the Archive, nor any part of the federal government can assure the reliability or suitability of these data for a particular purpose. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed for a user's application of these data or related materials.
The metadata, data, or related materials may be updated without notification. If a user believes errors are present in the metadata, data or related materials, please use the information in (1) Identification Information: Point of Contact, (2) Metadata Reference: Metadata Contact, or (3) Distribution Information: Distributor to notify the author or the Archive of the issues.
-
Standard_Order_Process:
-
-
Digital_Form:
-
-
Digital_Transfer_Information:
-
-
Format_Name: CSV
-
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
-
Format_Specification:
- Comma-separated values file
-
Digital_Transfer_Option:
-
-
Online_Option:
-
-
Computer_Contact_Information:
-
-
Network_Address:
-
-
Network_Resource_Name:
https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2024-002
-
Digital_Form:
-
-
Digital_Transfer_Information:
-
-
Format_Name: TEXT
-
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
-
Format_Specification:
- Text file (*.R) containing R code
-
Digital_Transfer_Option:
-
-
Online_Option:
-
-
Computer_Contact_Information:
-
-
Network_Address:
-
-
Network_Resource_Name:
https://doi.org/10.2737/NWRC-RDS-2024-002
-
Fees: None
Back to Top
-
Metadata_Reference_Information:
-
-
Metadata_Date: 20241024
-
Metadata_Contact:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Organization_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Organization: USDA, APHIS, Wildlife Service, National Wildlife Research Center
-
Contact_Person: Page Klug
-
Contact_Position: Supervisory Research Wildlife Biologist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 4101 LaPorte Ave.
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80521
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 701-630-3776
-
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
page.e.klug@usda.gov
-
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
-
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999
Back to Top