Spatial datasets of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the United States (270m)

Metadata:

Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Dillon, Gregory K.
Originator: Scott, Joe H.
Originator: Jaffe, Melissa R.
Originator: Olszewski, Julia H.
Originator: Vogler, Kevin C.
Originator: Finney, Mark A.
Originator: Short, Karen C.
Originator: Riley, Karin L.
Originator: Grenfell, Isaac C.
Originator: Jolly, W. Matthew
Originator: Brittain, Stuart
Publication_Date: 2023
Title:
Spatial datasets of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the United States (270m)
Edition: 3rd
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2016-0034-3
Description:
Abstract:
National data on burn probability (BP) and conditional flame-length probability (FLP) were generated for the conterminous United States (CONUS), Alaska, and Hawaii using a geospatial Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the USDA Forest Service Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory. The FSim system includes modules for weather generation, wildfire occurrence, fire growth, and fire suppression. FSim is designed to simulate the occurrence and growth of wildfires under tens of thousands of hypothetical contemporary fire seasons in order to estimate the probability of a given area (i.e., pixel) burning under current (end of 2020) landscape conditions and fire management practices. The data presented here represent modeled BP and FLPs for the United States (US) at a 270-meter grid spatial resolution. Flame-length probability is estimated for six standard Fire Intensity Levels. The six FILs correspond to flame-length classes as follows: FLP1 = < 2 feet (ft); FLP2 = 2 < 4 ft.; FLP3 = 4 < 6 ft.; FLP4 = 6 < 8 ft.; FLP5 = 8 < 12 ft.; FLP6 = 12+ ft. Because they indicate conditional probabilities (i.e., representing the likelihood of burning at a certain intensity level, given that a fire occurs), the FLP data must be used in conjunction with the BP data for risk assessment.
Purpose:
National-scale assessment of wildfire risk offers a consistent means of evaluating threats to valued resources and assets, thereby facilitating investments in management activities that can mitigate those risks. We used a simulation system to estimate the probabilistic components of wildfire risk across the nation. We generated the data in three volumes: (I) the conterminous U.S. (CONUS), (II) Alaska, and (III) Hawaii. These outputs have been generated to support a number of national planning and risk assessment efforts.
Supplemental_Information:
These data are a newer edition of the Short et al. (2016, 2020) data publications. This third edition is based on circa 2020 landscape data, which were the most current LANDFIRE products available at the time of production. The methods used to generate these data generally followed the same process used in previous editions, with improvements made at specific steps. The process steps outlined in the Data Quality, Lineage section of this metadata document are expanded from previous editions to more fully explain each step and provide additional details on methods for this edition. Beyond the newer input landscape data from LANDFIRE, we also used updated datasets for other inputs such as fire occurrence, observed gridded daily weather, and wind data from weather stations. To better capture recent climate conditions, we also shortened the time period of historical weather records used to inform the generation of simulated weather streams for simulation runs, using the most recent 15 years this time (2006-2020) rather than full record from 1972-2012 in the second edition. See the process steps described in the Data Quality, Lineage section for more details.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2023
Currentness_Reference:
Ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As needed
Spatial_Domain:
Description_of_Geographic_Extent:
United States
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -180.00000
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -65.258792
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 71.353142
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 18.896159
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: geoscientificInformation
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: National Research & Development Taxonomy
Theme_Keyword: Ecology, Ecosystems, & Environment
Theme_Keyword: Fire
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: burn probability
Theme_Keyword: flame length
Theme_Keyword: fire intensity
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: United States
Place_Keyword: CONUS
Place_Keyword: Hawaii
Place_Keyword: Alaska
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:

Dillon, Gregory K.; Scott, Joe H.; Jaffe, Melissa R.; Olszewski, Julia H.; Vogler, Kevin C.; Finney, Mark A.; Short, Karen C.; Riley, Karin L.; Grenfell, Isaac C.; Jolly, W. Matthew; Brittain, Stuart. 2023. Spatial datasets of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the United States (270m). 3rd Edition. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2016-0034-3

Users are strongly encouraged to read and fully comprehend the metadata prior to data use. Users should acknowledge the Originator when using this dataset as a source. Users should share data products developed using the source dataset with the Originator. No warranty is made by the Originator as to the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of these data for individual use or aggregate use with other data, or for purposes not intended by the Originator. This dataset is intended to estimate probabilistic wildfire risk components that can support national strategic planning. The applicability of the data to support fire and land management planning on smaller areas will vary by location and specific intended use. Further investigation by local and regional experts should be conducted to inform decisions regarding local applicability. It is the sole responsibility of the local user, using this metadata document and local knowledge, to determine if and/or how these data can be used for particular areas of interest. National FSim products are not intended to replace local products where they exist, but rather serve as a back-up by providing wall-to-wall cross-boundary data coverage. It is the responsibility of the user to be familiar with the value, assumptions, and limitations of these national data publications. Managers and planners must evaluate these data according to the scale and requirements specific to their needs. Spatial information may not meet National Map Accuracy Standards. This information may be updated without notification.
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory
Contact_Person: Greg Dillon
Contact_Position: Director, Fire Modeling Institute
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory
Address: 5775 US Hwy 10 W
City: Missoula
State_or_Province: MT
Postal_Code: 59808
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 406-329-4800
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: greg.dillon@usda.gov
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as original publication date. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
Browse_Graphic:
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: \Supplements\I_FSim_CONUS_BP_LF2020_270m.png
Browse_Graphic_File_Description:
Burn probability (BP) map for the conterminous United States using class breaks on a full log (1/3-log) scale.
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: PNG
Browse_Graphic:
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: \Supplements\II_FSim_Alaska_BP_LF2020_270m.png
Browse_Graphic_File_Description:
BP map for Alaska using class breaks on a full log (1/3-log) scale.
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: PNG
Browse_Graphic:
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: \Supplements\III_FSim_Hawaii_BP_LF2020_270m.png
Browse_Graphic_File_Description:
BP map for Hawaii using class breaks on a full log (1/3-log) scale.
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: PNG
Browse_Graphic:
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: \Supplements\CONUS_LF2020_FLP#_270m.png
Browse_Graphic_File_Description:
Conditional flame-length probability (FLP) maps for each of the six flame length classes for the conterminous United States.
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: PNG
Browse_Graphic:
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: \Supplements\AK_LF2020_FLP#_270m.png
Browse_Graphic_File_Description:
Conditional FLP maps for each of the six flame length classes for Alaska.
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: PNG
Browse_Graphic:
Browse_Graphic_File_Name: \Supplements\HI_LF2020_FLP#_270m.png
Browse_Graphic_File_Description:
Conditional FLP maps for each of the six flame length classes for Hawaii.
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: PNG
Data_Set_Credit:
Funding for this project provided by USDA Forest Service, Fire and Aviation Management and the Rocky Mountain Research Station.


Author Information:

Gregory K. Dillon
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6304-650X

Joe H. Scott
Pyrologix LLC
https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3246-1190

Melissa R. Jaffe
Pyrologix LLC
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8623-407X

Julia H. Olszewski
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3205-7100

Kevin C. Vogler
Pyrologix LLC
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7080-2557

Mark A. Finney
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station

Karen C. Short
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-0460

Karin L. Riley
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6593-5657

Isaac C. Grenfell
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3779-1681

W. Matthew Jolly
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0457-6563

Stuart Brittain
Alturas Solutions, LLC
Native_Data_Set_Environment:
Microsoft Windows Enterprise; ArcGIS Desktop 10.8.2
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Short, Karen C.
Originator: Finney, Mark A.
Originator: Scott, Joe H.
Originator: Gilbertson-Day, Julie W.
Originator: Grenfell, Isaac C.
Publication_Date: 2016
Title:
Spatial dataset of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the conterminous United States
Edition: 1st
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2016-0034
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Short, Karen C.
Originator: Finney, Mark A.
Originator: Vogler, Kevin C.
Originator: Scott, Joe H.
Originator: Gilbertson-Day, Julie W.
Originator: Grenfell, Isaac C.
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
Spatial dataset of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the conterminous United States (270m)
Edition: 2nd
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: raster digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2016-0034-2
Analytical_Tool:
Analytical_Tool_Description:
FSim is often referred to as a "large fire simulator" because it attempts to model the ignition and growth of only those wildfires with a propensity to spread. Relatively large and generally fast-moving fires are the focus of this system because they account for the majority (~80-97%) of total area burned per simulation unit, etc., and thus contribute the greatest to the probability of a wildland fire burning a given parcel of land therein (i.e., wildfire hazard). Fire occurrence in FSim is stochastically modeled based on historical relationships between large fires and Energy Release Component (ERC), a fire danger index that reflects dryness based on temperature and precipitation over approximately a 40-day period. The size threshold for defining a large fire was calculated for each spatial simulation unit (pyrome) and ranged from 73 acres up to 4,380 acres.

Because its objective is to simulate the behavior of large, spreading fires, FSim only models fire growth on days when the ERC reaches or exceeds the 80th percentile condition, signifying dry fuel conditions. On those days, the length of the active burning period is set at 1 hour, 3 hours, and 5 hours for the 80th, 90th, and 97th percentile ERC conditions, respectively. Fire growth and behavior is calculated using standard FlamMap routines and a minimum travel time (MTT) algorithm. Suppression influences on growth are accounted for by two mechanisms. The first is a statistical model that determines fire duration by indicating probability of containment (cessation) based on spread rates, fuel types, and the length of time a fire has been burning throughout each fire simulation. The second mechanism is a ‘perimeter trimming’ function that simulates the effect of suppression actions on fire progression and shape, resulting in improved fire size distributions from the simulation.

The fire growth simulations, when run over a multitude of individual fire seasons, each with different ignition locations and weather streams, generate burn probabilities and fire behavior distributions at each landscape location (i.e., cell or pixel). Results are objectively evaluated through comparison with historical fire patterns and statistics, including the mean fire size and number of large fires per million acres for each simulation unit. This evaluation is part of the FSim calibration process, whereby simulation inputs are adjusted until the mean fire size and number of large fires per million acres fall within an acceptable range of the historical reference value (i.e., the 70% confidence interval for the mean).

For a technical overview of the Fire Simulation (FSim) system developed by the USDA Forest Service, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory to estimate probabilistic components of wildfire risk, see Finney et al. (2011).
Tool_Access_Information:
Tool_Access_Instructions:
Please send requests to: Fire Modeling Institute, USFS Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 US Highway 10 West, Missoula, Montana, 59808; SM.FS.mso_fmi@usda.gov
Tool_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Finney, Mark A.
Originator: McHugh, Charles W.
Originator: Grenfell, Isaac C.
Originator: Riley, Karin L.
Originator: Short, Karen C.
Publication_Date: 2011
Title:
A simulation of probabilistic wildfire risk components for the continental United States
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
Issue_Identification: 25(7): 973-1000
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0462-z
Online_Linkage: https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/39312
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
Model results are objectively evaluated through comparison with historical fire patterns and statistics within each pyrome. This evaluation is part of the FSim calibration process, whereby simulation inputs are adjusted until the validation statistics fall within an acceptable range of the historical reference value (±10%). Statistics used as calibration targets were: a) mean annual number of large fires per million burnable acres; and b) mean annual large-fire area burned per million burnable acres. The reference period for calibration targets was the most recent 15 years of records from the Fire Occurrence Database (FOD) (2006-2020). In addition to the calibration targets, several variables were graphed in each pyrome as visual checks on the number and sizes of fires produced in the simulation. These variables included: historical vs. simulated 15-year cumulative fire size distribution (plotted as fire size against annual fire size exceedance probability), full FOD period (1992-2020) mean annual number of large fires and large-fire area burned, and first 15-years FOD (1992-2006) mean annual number of fires and large-fire area burned. For more information on the calibration process see Thompson et al. (2016, 2022).

Thompson, Matthew P.; Bowden, Phil; Brough, April; Scott, Joe H.; Gilbertson-Day, Julie; Taylor, Alan; Anderson, Jennifer; Haas, Jessica R. 2016. Application of wildfire risk assessment results to wildfire response planning in the Southern Sierra Nevada, California, USA. Forests. 7(3): 64. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7030064 and https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/50797

Thompson, Matthew P.; Vogler, Kevin C.; Scott, Joe H.; Miller, Carol. 2022. Comparing risk-based fuel treatment prioritization with alternative strategies for enhancing protection and resource management objectives. Fire Ecology. 18: 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42408-022-00149-0 and https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/66231
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Pixels with nonzero values for BP also have nonzero sum-total values in the FLP* layers, and the six FLP layers will sum to 1. Pixels with values of zero ("0") for BP have corresponding sum-total zero ("0") values in the FLP* layers.
Completeness_Report:
Cells with a zero ("0") value for BP were characterized as a non-burnable fuel type in the LANDFIRE FBFM40 dataset when resampled to 270-m pixels. All pixels with a burnable fuel type inside the US borders will have a nonzero BP value and the six FLP layers will sum to 1.
Lineage:
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Short, Karen C.
Originator: Grenfell, Isaac C.
Originator: Riley, Karin L.
Originator: Vogler, Kevin C.
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
Pyromes of the conterminous United States
Edition: 1st
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0020
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2020
Source_Currentness_Reference:
ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
Pyromes_CONUS_20200206 (Short et al. 2020)
Source_Contribution:
Pyrome polygons were used as spatial simulation units. Simulations were run on each pyrome separately, using inputs and calibration targets specific to each pyrome. There are 136 total pyromes, with 128 in CONUS, seven in Alaska, and one in Hawaii. Pyromes are based on customized ecoregional boundaries (Short et al. 2020).
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Short, Karen C.
Publication_Date: 2022
Title:
Spatial wildfire occurrence data for the United States, 1992-2020 [FPA_FOD_20221014]
Edition: 6th
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2013-0009.6
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1992
Ending_Date: 2020
Source_Currentness_Reference:
ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
FPA_FOD_20221014 (Short et al. 2022)
Source_Contribution:
This historical wildfire dataset was used in development of the FSim products.

The development of the historical fire-occurrence data is described in a companion paper:

Short, Karen C. 2014. A spatial database of wildfires in the United States, 1992-2011. Earth System Science Data 6:1-27. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-6-1-2014
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service
Originator: U.S. Department of the Interior
Publication_Date: 2022
Title:
LANDFIRE 2020
Edition: 2.2.0
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: database
Online_Linkage: https://www.landfire.gov/
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Multiple_Dates/Times:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2017
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2018
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2019
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2020
Source_Currentness_Reference:
ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
LANDFIRE 2020 (LF 2020 - LF_2.2.0)
Source_Contribution:
Multiple files were obtained from this source and are listed below.

1. LANDFIRE 2020 (LF 2020 - LF_2.2.0) fuels data (for 2020) were used to represent surface and canopy fuels in the landscape file created as input to FSim.

Fuels datasets: 40 Scott and Burgan Fire Behavior Fuel Models (FBFM40), Forest Canopy Cover (CC), Forest Canopy Height (CH), Forest Canopy Bulk Density (CBD), Forest Canopy Base Height (CBH)

Scott, Joe H.; Burgan, Robert E. 2005. Standard fire behavior fuel models: a comprehensive set for use with Rothermel's surface fire spread model. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-153. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 72 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/rmrs-gtr-153


2. LANDFIRE 2020 (LF 2020 - LF_2.2.0) topographic data (for 2020) were included in the landscape file created as input to FSim.

Topographic datasets: Elevation, Aspect, Slope


3. LANDFIRE annual disturbance rasters were used to identify areas that experience wildfires in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2020. See process step 1.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service
Originator: U.S. Department of the Interior
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
LANDFIRE 2016
Edition: 2.0.0
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: database
Online_Linkage: https://www.landfire.gov/version_download.php
Online_Linkage: https://www.landfire.gov/fuel.php
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 2016
Source_Currentness_Reference:
ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
LANDFIRE 2016 (LF 2016 - LF_2.0.0)
Source_Contribution:
LANDFIRE 2016 (LF 2016 - LF_2.0.0) fuels data (for 2016) were used in areas with significant recent disturbance to represent surface and canopy fuels in the landscape file used during FSim calibration as described in process step 1.
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Abatzoglou, John
Publication_Date: 2013
Title:
gridMET
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: NetCDF
Online_Linkage: https://www.climatologylab.org/gridmet.html
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1992
Ending_Date: 2020
Source_Currentness_Reference:
ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
Abatzoglou (2013)
Source_Contribution:
A gridded daily historical climatology was used to generate values of ERC and dead fuel moisture content for the period of 1992-2020. This provided input data needed to generate synthetic weather streams for the FSim simulations.

Abatzoglou, John T. 2013. Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modeling. International Journal of Climatology. 33: 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3413
Source_Information:
Source_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Western Regional Climate Center
Publication_Date: Unknown
Title:
RAWS USA Climate Archive
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Reno, NV
Publisher: Western Regional Climate Center
Online_Linkage: https://raws.dri.edu/
Type_of_Source_Media: online
Source_Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1992
Ending_Date: 2020
Source_Currentness_Reference:
ground condition
Source_Citation_Abbreviation:
RAWS
Source_Contribution:
Wind data from a selected RAWS station from each pyrome was used to determine distributions of wind speeds and directions for simulations.
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
1. Prepare the landscape file (LCP; fuelscape).

LANDFIRE version 2.2.0 (2020) fuel and topography data were downloaded as full-extent mosaics from landfire.gov. Data were acquired, processed, and stored in three separate domains for this project: I – CONUS, II – Alaska, III – Hawaii. In each domain the fuel and topography rasters were resampled to 270-meter (m) resolution using the nearest-neighbor resampling method. These resampled 270-m rasters were snapped to the 270-m rasters published in the previous edition of national FSim data products (Short et al. 2020).

In each pyrome, the area included in the landscape file extended 60 kilometers (km) beyond the pyrome boundary to allow for fires to grow unhindered by the edge of the fuelscape, which would otherwise truncate fire growth and affect the simulated fire-size distribution.

Ideally, FSim would be calibrated to contemporary fire occurrence statistics using a fuelscape representing conditions before recent large disturbances, with an updated post-disturbance fuelscape then substituted in only in final production runs. This was not an option on this project because of vegetation and fuel mapping method changes between the previous version (2.0.0; 2016) and most recent version (2.2.0; 2020). However, during FSim calibration runs, analysts noted that significant large wildfire events had occurred in the last 5-10 years in some pyromes, causing simulated burn probability in non-disturbed portions of the pyrome to be too high because the fuel conditions that produced observed fires are no longer present. Given this situation, a decision was made in pyromes with the greatest fraction of area disturbed in the last 5-10 years to substitute pre-disturbance fuels within the footprint of areas burned between 2017 and 2020. LANDFIRE version 2.0.0 (2016) fuels were used those pixels for calibration runs, with version 2.2.0 fuels used everywhere else. Burned areas were identified using LANDFIRE’s individual year disturbance rasters for 2017-2020.

An edit was made to the LANDFIRE 2.2.0 canopy base height (CBH) raster in one vegetation type (Fuel Vegetation Type 2301; Laurentian-Acadian Sub-boreal Aspen-Birch Forest) in Pyromes 96 and 98 (the Superior National Forest area of Minnesota). Within that area, CBH values were multiplied by 0.35 on all pixels mapped with fuel model Timber Understory 2 (TU2). The edit was needed to increase the occurrence of torching and crowning because crown fire behavior is not uncommon here, but only surface fire was simulated with the off-the-shelf CBH raster.
Process_Date: 2022
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
2. Determine large fire size thresholds for each pyrome.

For each pyrome, a large fire size threshold was determined from the FOD records from 1992-2020 by identifying the fire size at which the slope of a Lorenz curve equaled 1 (Lorenz curve represents the cumulative number of fires plotted against the cumulative proportion of area burned). FSim fire-size distributions frequently exhibit a discontinuity at a fire size of four pixels (regardless of pixel resolution), making the results unreliable at that number of pixels and smaller. To avoid that issue, the minimum allowable large-fire size was 73 acres (just larger than four pixels at 270-m resolution). These pyrome-specific large-fire sizes were used for parameterizing FSim (building the logistic regression coefficients and fire-day distribution (FDist) table for the FDist file), establishing calibration targets (mean annual number of large fires and mean annual large-fire area burned), and generating the Ignition Density Grids (rasters representing the historical spatial pattern of large fire ignitions across the pyrome).
Process_Date: 2022
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
3. Create ignition density rasters.

For each pyrome, a 270-m Ignition Density Grid (IDG) was produced using the large-fire size threshold calculated specific to that pyrome from fires occurring from 1992-2020. The IDG is used by FSim to represent the relative historical spatial pattern of large fire ignitions, and was created through a multi-step process designed to account for spatially variable ignitable land cover within a moving-window search radius. The IDGs across all pyromes were normalized to have a minimum value of 50 and a maximum value of 1000. In lieu of using an ignition mask in FSim simulations, IDG values in the buffer area around each pyrome were set to zero so fires would not ignite in the buffer during simulations.
Process_Date: 2022
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
4. Process gridMET data and produce ERC at virtual station locations in each pyrome.

Daily values of Energy Release Component for fire danger fuel model G (ERC-G) and dead fuel moisture content for the period 1992-2020 were calculated for a representative location within each pyrome from a gridded historical climatology derived from gridMET data. Corrections for precipitation duration were made to the gridMET data following methods described in Jolly et al. (2019). A representative location (i.e., virtual station) in each pyrome was selected to be the location within the pyrome with the highest density of large-fire ignitions (but not closer than about 10 km from the pyrome boundary). We generated an FW13 file (fire weather file format) with temperature, humidity, and precipitation data for each of these virtual station locations, and then used these FW13 daily observations to generate daily values of ERC and dead fuel moisture content using a custom command-line utility called NFDRScli. Station catalog data for the virtual stations used as input for the NFDRScli tool were obtained from nearby RAWS.

Jolly, W. Matt; Freeborn, Patrick H.; Page, Wesley G.; Butler, Bret W. 2019. Severe Fire Danger Index: A forecastable metric to inform firefighter and community wildfire risk management. Fire. 2: 47. https://doi.org/10.3390/fire2030047 and https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/58973
Process_Date: 2021
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
5. Create the FDist file.

The FDist file lists the logistic regression coefficients needed by FSim for estimating daily large-fire ignition probability in relation to ERC-G, and the historical empirical distribution of the number of large fires per large-fire day. We used the BuildFDist command-line utility to generate an FDist file for each pyrome based on each pyrome’s daily historical ERC values and large-fire occurrence during the full 1992-2020 FOD reference period.
Process_Date: 2022
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
6. Generate simulated ERCs and produce SeasonERC file.

Using historical ERC data for the contemporary 15-year period (2006-2020), we generated 20,000 years of simulated daily ERC values, synchronous across CONUS, for all 128 CONUS pyromes. These are not 20,000 years into the future; rather, they are 20,000 possible realizations of a contemporary year based on statistics present in the 2006-2020 observational data. The simulated ERCs were formatted into the required SeasonERC.csv (SERC) format required by FSim.
Process_Date: 2022
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
7. Process wind data from RAWS and integrate with ERC data to produce FRISK file.

The FRISK file contains information required by FSim about three aspects of fire weather. The first section is for Time Series Data and stores historical ERC data. We populated this section with ERC data from the full FOD reference period of 1992-2020 but we did not use these data in the simulations. Instead, we used ERC information contained in the SeasonERC file. The second section of the FRISK is the percentiles section. It lists the ERC and moisture content values for percentiles between 0 and 100%. We populated this section initially using the command-line BuildFRISK utility from the FW13 files created for the selected virtual station locations using the full historical 1992-2020 period. We subsequently used the ModFRISK utility to update the ERC values for each percentile to use simulated ERCs for 1992-2020. We calculated percentiles from the simulated ERC values rather than the historical because the simulated ERCs sometimes had very different exceedance probabilities causing unpredictable results from FSim. The third section of the FRISK consists of tabular distributions of wind speed and direction by month. The FRISK wind distributions were generated with the BuildFRISK utility from the pyrome’s selected RAWS. The following are true about wind records included in creating the FRISK:

• Use as much of the full 1992-2020 period as available (minimum 10 years);
• Use observations from noon to 11pm;
• Use sustained wind speeds;
• Use the Weibull option for wind speed distributions;
• Allow a maximum sustained wind speed of 40 miles/hour.

Although the ERC values used in the simulations (SeasonERC file) were generated from the contemporary 15-year period (2006-2020), the ERC percentiles in the FRISK file are for the full 29-year FOD period (1992-2020). This was done to capture and represent changes in ERC values over time that could cause extreme values of the simulated ERCs to occur more often than the nominal percentile would suggest. For example, under a stationary climate the 80th percentile ERC would be exceeded on 20 percent of the simulation days. Under a changing climate, the 80th percentile could be exceeded on more than 20 percent of the simulation days, which could result in both more fires per year and longer-duration fires.
Process_Date: 2022
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
8. Prepare additional FSim input files.

The ADJ file is an input to FSim that adjusts rates of spread by surface fuel model. We populated the ADJ files initially with baseline values arrived at through many years of running FSim on other projects across the United States. We used a baseline ADJ value of 0.30 in all grass and grass-shrub fuel models, and 0.60 in all shrub, timber litter, timber understory, and slash-blowdown fuel models. These values were then adjusted during calibration runs to help achieve calibration targets.

The FMS file is an input file that allows fuel moisture values from the FRISK file to be overridden. We used the FMS file to enter fixed values of live herbaceous and live woody fuel moisture at the 80th, 90th, and 97th percentile ERC bins. We specified live herbaceous moisture content at 60%, 45%, and 30% at those three ERC levels respectively. We specified live woody moisture content at 110%, 90%, and 70% at those same ERC levels. Dead fuel moisture values still came from the FRISK file.
Process_Date: 2022
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
9. FSim model calibration.

FSim model calibration involved a series of iterative model runs in each pyrome with adjustments to input parameters until there was reasonable agreement with target values derived from fire occurrence data. Calibration targets for this project were, in each pyrome, the mean annual number of large fires per million burnable acres (±10%) and the mean annual large-fire area burned per million burnable acres (±10%), calculated from the last 15 years of the FOD (2006-2020).

For the initial calibration run in each pyrome we set the AcreFract parameter in FSim to 1.0 and used ADJ values of 0.30 for grass and grass-shrub fuel models and 0.60 for all other fuel models. Successive calibration runs were performed until the simulated with gradually increasing numbers of iterations, ending with about 25-50% of the final number of iterations, until simulated occurrence was “within range” of the historical occurrence. A simulation was considered "within range" if (1) the simulated annual number of large fires was within 10% of the 2006-2020 historical mean, and (2) the simulated annual large-fire area burned was within 10% of the 2006-2020 historical mean. The spatial pattern of simulated BP was then visually checked against known fire perimeters (from the Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity program (MTBS): https://www.mtbs.gov/); and issues were addressed if needed. After mosaicking pyromes within a geographic area, we visually checked for spatial discontinuities in the mosaicked BP and intensity results and addressed any issues that were revealed. After calibration of all pyromes, the historical and simulated fire-size distributions were compared to ensure a reasonable fit.

There are no FSim inputs that directly affect mean annual area burned; they instead directly affect the annual number and/or mean size of fires (and consequently the slope of the fire-size distribution), which then affects mean annual area burned. Calibration adjustments were therefore chosen to affect the number and/or sizes of fires. Calibration of an individual pyrome generally followed the following steps:

First run: The base ADJ values (0.30 for grass/grass-shrub and 0.60 for all other fuel models) were used for the initial run. The AcreFract parameter was set to 1.0 for the initial run. Sustained winds for the initially selected RAWS were used for the initial calibration run. The fire size list for this simulation was pasted into a Microsoft Excel calibration workbook to visualize the result and determine inputs for the next run.

Second and subsequent runs: If the simulated mean large-fire size varied from the historical by more than a factor of three, a new RAWS with higher or lower winds was considered. If a new RAWS was not indicated, adjustments to the ADJ values were implemented to bring the simulated mean large-fire size closer to the historical. Standard guidance on subsequent-run ADJ values was developed based on experience on past FSim calibration projects. Additionally, a new value for the AcreFract parameter was calculated to bring the simulated mean annual number of large fires to within 10% of the historical (2006-2020) mean annual number of large fires. Adjustments to the ADJ values and AcreFract continued on successive calibration runs until the simulated occurrence fell within 10% of the historical target. Other FSim parameters that were adjusted when needed included the SuppressionFactor (only in pyrome 91) and the FireDayDistribution in the FDist input file.
Process_Date: 2023
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
10. FSim production runs.

Once each pyrome was considered within range of the calibration targets and had passed other quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) checks, a final full-iteration FSim run was performed. Final runs used input parameters arrived at through the calibration process and 20,000-100,000 iterations (i.e., potential annual weather scenarios) depending on the number of iterations needed to generate enough simulated fire perimeters across most burnable pixels to calculate probabilities.
Process_Date: 2023
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
11. FSim post-processing and QA/QC.

After final FSim runs were completed in each pyrome, the individual pyrome rasters were mosaicked into products for CONUS, Alaska, and Hawaii. Because each pyrome included a 60 km buffer for simulation and fires were allowed only to start inside the pyrome boundary and burn out (by setting IDG values to no-data in the buffer), mosaics were created by simply adding BP values from adjacent pyromes. Pixels with burnable fuel types that did not burn in any simulations were assigned estimated values in the BP and FLP rasters as described in the entity and attribute section.
Process_Date: 2023
Back to Top
Spatial_Data_Organization_Information:
Direct_Spatial_Reference_Method: Raster
Raster_Object_Information:
Raster_Object_Type: Pixel
Back to Top
Spatial_Reference_Information:
Horizontal_Coordinate_System_Definition:
Planar:
Map_Projection:
Map_Projection_Name: USA Contiguous Albers Equal Area Conic USGS version
Albers_Conical_Equal_Area:
Standard_Parallel: 29.5
Standard_Parallel: 45.5
Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -96.0
Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 23.0
False_Easting: 0.0
False_Northing: 0.0
Planar_Coordinate_Information:
Planar_Coordinate_Encoding_Method: coordinate pair
Coordinate_Representation:
Abscissa_Resolution: 0.0000000037527980722984474
Ordinate_Resolution: 0.0000000037527980722984474
Planar_Distance_Units: meter
Geodetic_Model:
Horizontal_Datum_Name: North American Datum of 1983
Ellipsoid_Name: GRS 1980
Semi-major_Axis: 6378137.0000
Denominator_of_Flattening_Ratio: 298.257222101
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Below is a description of the files included in this data publication.

DATA FILES - BURN PROBABILITY (3)
All burn probablity data files are Georeferenced TIFF (GeoTIFF) files and include additional associated files (e.g., *.xml, *.tfw, and *.ovr).

1. \Data\I_FSim_CONUS_LF2020_270m\CONUS_BP.tif: Modeled national burn probability (BP) data for the conterminous United States at a 270-meter grid spatial resolution.

2. \Data\II_FSim_Alaska_LF2020_270m\AK_BP.tif: Modeled national BP data for Alaska at a 270-meter grid spatial resolution.

3. \Data\III_FSim_Hawaii_LF2020_270m\HI_BP.tif: Modeled national BP data for Hawaii at a 270-meter grid spatial resolution.

Values in the BP data layer indicate, for each pixel, the number of times that cell was burned by an FSim-modeled fire, divided by the total number of annual iterations simulated. The burn probability layer depicts only one component of wildfire risk, indicating the tendency of any given pixel to burn, given the static circa 2020 landscape conditions depicted by the LANDFIRE data, contemporary weather and ignition patterns, as well as contemporary fire management policies (entailing considerable fire prevention and suppression efforts). Pixels with burnable fuel types that did not burn in any simulation iterations (20,000-100,000 iterations depending on pyrome) were assigned a nominal burn probability value of 0.000008 (1 in 120,000). This value is lower than any value calculated through the simulations and prevents subsequent calculations of hazard or risk on these pixels from automatically being zero.

The BP data do not, and are not intended to, depict fire-return intervals of any vintage, nor do they indicate projected fire footprints or routes of travel. Nothing about the expected shape or size of any actual fire incident can be interpreted from the burn probabilities. Instead, the BP data, in conjunction with the FLP layers, are intended to support an actuarial approach to quantitative wildfire risk analysis (e.g., see Thompson et al. 2011).



DATA FILES - CONDITIONAL FLAME-LENGTH PROBABILITY (18)
All conditional flame-length probablity data files are Georeferenced TIFF (GeoTIFF) files and include additional associated files (e.g., *.xml, *.tfw, and *.ovr).

1-6. \Data\I_FSim_CONUS_LF2020_270m\CONUS_FLP#.tif: Conditional flame-length probability (FLP) data for the conterminous United States at a 270-meter grid spatial resolution (# = 1-6, which represents the different flame length probability levels described below).

7-12. \Data\II_FSim_Alaska_LF2020_270m\AK_FLP#.tif: Conditional FLP data for Alaska at a 270-meter grid spatial resolution (# = 1-6, which represents the different flame length probability levels described below).

13-18. \Data\III_FSim_Hawaii_LF2020_270m\HI_FLP#.tif: Conditional FLP data for Hawaii at a 270-meter grid spatial resolution (# = 1-6, which represents the different flame length probability levels described below).

Values in the FLP layers indicate, of all simulated fires that burned a given cell, the proportion in each Flame Length Probability (flame-length class). The six FLPs correspond to flame-length classes as follows:
FLP1 = < 2 feet (ft.)
FLP2 = 2 < 4 ft.
FLP3 = 4 < 6 ft.
FLP4 = 6 < 8 ft.
FLP5 = 8 < 12 ft.
FLP6 = 12+ ft.

Burnable fuel types that did not burn within simulation limits (20,000-100,000 annual weather scenarios modeled, depending on the pyrome) were assigned an average FLP value based on the pyrome-wide mean of similar pixels. The purpose of assigning FLP values in these cases is so subsequent calculations of wildfire hazard and risk will not automatically equal zero at these pixels. FLP rasters were divided into zones based on combination of pyrome, surface fuel model, and presence or absence of burnable canopy cover (defined as Canopy Cover > 0 and Canopy Base Height <= 30). Zonal means were calculated in ArcGIS for every combination, and pixels with burnable fuel models that did not burn during simulations were assigned the mean value from burned pixels with the same combination of pyrome, fuel model, and burnable canopy presence/absence. Values assigned in this manner were checked and adjusted where necessary to ensure that the six FLP rasters summed to one in all cases. The reliability of FLP estimations likely increases with the number of simulations where a pixel was burned.

The utility of the calibrated FSim BP and FLP data for quantitative geospatial wildfire risk assessment is described in Thompson et al. (2011) and Scott et al. (2013).



SUPPLEMENTAL FILES (6)
All supplemental files are Portable Network Graphics (PNG) files.

1. \Supplements\CONUS_LF2020_BP_270m.png: Burn probability (BP) map for the conterminous United States using class breaks on a full log (1/3-log) scale.

2. \Supplements\CONUS_ LF2020_ FLP#_270m.png: Conditional flame length probability (FLP) maps for each of the six flame length classes for the conterminous United States using class breaks of 0.1.

3. \Supplements\AK_LF2020_BP_270m.png: BP map for Alaska using class breaks on a full log (1/3-log) scale.

4. \Supplements\AK_ LF2020_ FLP#_270m.png: Conditional FLP maps for each of the six flame length classes for Alaska using class breaks of 0.1.

5. \Supplements\HI_LF2020_BP_270m.png: BP map for Hawaii using class breaks on a full log (1/3-log) scale.

6. \Supplements\HI_ LF2020_ FLP#_270m.png: Conditional FLP maps for each of the six flame length classes for Hawaii using class breaks of 0.1.
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
Thompson, Matthew P.; Calkin, David E.; Finney, Mark A.; Ager, Alan A.; Gilbertson-Day, Julie W. 2011. Integrated national-scale assessment of wildfire risk to human and ecological values. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment 25:761-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-011-0461-0

Scott, Joe H.; Thompson, Matthew P.; Calkin, David E. 2013. A wildfire risk assessment framework for land and resource management. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-315. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/rmrs-gtr-315
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Research and Development
Contact_Position: Research Data Archivist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 240 West Prospect Road
City: Fort Collins
State_or_Province: CO
Postal_Code: 80526
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: see Contact Instructions
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as of September 2023. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
Resource_Description: RDS-2016-0034-3
Distribution_Liability:
Metadata documents have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Unless otherwise stated, all data and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. However, neither the author, the Archive, nor any part of the federal government can assure the reliability or suitability of these data for a particular purpose. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed for a user's application of these data or related materials.

The metadata, data, or related materials may be updated without notification. If a user believes errors are present in the metadata, data or related materials, please use the information in (1) Identification Information: Point of Contact, (2) Metadata Reference: Metadata Contact, or (3) Distribution Information: Distributor to notify the author or the Archive of the issues.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: TIFF
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
Format_Specification:
Geostationary Earth Orbit Tagged Image File Format (GeoTIFF)
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2016-0034-3
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: PNG
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
Format_Specification:
Portable Graphic Network file
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2016-0034-3
Fees: None
Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20230920
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory
Contact_Person: Greg Dillon
Contact_Position: Director, Fire Modeling Institute
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory
Address: 5775 US Hwy 10 W
City: Missoula
State_or_Province: MT
Postal_Code: 59808
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 406-329-4800
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: greg.dillon@usda.gov
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as original publication date. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001-1998
Back to Top