Response of overstory trees and understory regeneration to a green-tree retention harvest as part of the Spearfish Timber Sale, Wind River Experimental Forest

Metadata:

Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Harrington, Constance A.
Publication_Date: 2019
Title:
Response of overstory trees and understory regeneration to a green-tree retention harvest as part of the Spearfish Timber Sale, Wind River Experimental Forest
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector and tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2019-0024
Description:
Abstract:
This data publication contains the 1989 and 1998 data from the assessment of overstory trees and the regeneration 12 years after a clearcut harvest with reserve trees in an even-aged, 145-year-old Douglas-fir stand on a moderately productive site (site class 3) in southwest Washington in the Wind River Experimental Forest. The 15 hectare (ha) harvest unit was superimposed over two areas differentially thinned 15 and 34 years before clearcutting, which retained 18 trees/ha with a mean diameter of 63 centimeters. This study is described in more detail in Buermeyer and Harrington (2002). The data provided include 1989 and 1998 tree height and diameter for all 287 overstory trees in the 15 ha harvest unit, along with additional measurements for some trees such as tree damage, severity, and height to live crown. A subset of these trees were also cored to provide diameter at breast height growth increases in 3 year increments from 1977-1998. An additional 1 ha study plot was placed within the 15 ha harvest unit. The location, height class, and species of all 5870 seedlings (both overstory and understory trees) on this plot were measured in October 1998.
Purpose:
In the 1990s there was increased interest in the Pacific Northwest in retaining live overstory trees (green tree retention). This study was initially planned as an operational shelterwood harvest superimposed over a thinning trial and it was realized that collection of additional data could be useful in documenting response (survival and growth) of the residual overstory trees and seeing the pattern, amount, and growth of the natural regeneration that resulted. The study was visited on several tours.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Range_of_Dates/Times:
Beginning_Date: 1977
Ending_Date: 1998
Currentness_Reference:
Ground condition
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: As Needed
Spatial_Domain:
Description_of_Geographic_Extent:
The study was conducted in a 15 hectare harvest unit in the Panther Creek Division of the Wind River Experimental Forest in southwestern Washington, which is in the Gifford Pinchot National Forest.
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -121.8283
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -121.8383
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 45.8372
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 45.8314
Bounding_Altitudes:
Altitude_Minimum: 670
Altitude_Maximum: 730
Altitude_Distance_Units: meters
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: farming
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: National Research & Development Taxonomy
Theme_Keyword: Natural Resource Management & Use
Theme_Keyword: Forest management
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: tree regeneration
Theme_Keyword: tree growth
Theme_Keyword: reserve trees
Theme_Keyword: crown width
Theme_Keyword: drip lines
Theme_Keyword: tree height
Theme_Keyword: tree diameter
Theme_Keyword: species
Theme_Keyword: regeneration harvest
Theme_Keyword: survival
Theme_Keyword: windthrow
Theme_Keyword: natural regeneration
Theme_Keyword: green tree retention
Theme_Keyword: spatial analysis
Theme_Keyword: Pielou's nonrandomness index
Theme_Keyword: skid trails
Theme_Keyword: growing-season precipitation
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: Wind River Experimental Forest
Place_Keyword: Panther Creek Division
Place_Keyword: Wind River Ranger District
Place_Keyword: Mt. Adams Ranger District
Place_Keyword: Gifford Pinchot National Forest
Place_Keyword: southwestern Washington
Place_Keyword: Washington Cascades
Place_Keyword: Washington
Taxonomy:
Keywords/Taxon:
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus:
None
Taxonomic_Keywords: plants
Taxonomic_Keywords: multiple species
Taxonomic_Keywords: Acer macrophyllum
Taxonomic_Keywords: Abies grandis
Taxonomic_Keywords: Abies procera
Taxonomic_Keywords: Acer circinatum
Taxonomic_Keywords: Acer glabrum
Taxonomic_Keywords: Gaultheria shallon
Taxonomic_Keywords: Pinus monticola
Taxonomic_Keywords: Pseudotsuga menziesii
Taxonomic_Keywords: Thuja plicata
Taxonomic_Keywords: Vaccinium parvifolium
Taxonomic_System:
Classification_System/Authority:
Classification_System_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: ITIS
Publication_Date: 2019
Title:
Integrated Taxonomic Information System
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: database
Other_Citation_Details:
Retrieved [May, 22, 2019]
Online_Linkage: https://www.itis.gov
Taxonomic_Procedures:
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Plantae
Applicable_Common_Name: plantes
Applicable_Common_Name: Planta
Applicable_Common_Name: Vegetal
Applicable_Common_Name: plants
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subkingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Viridiplantae
Applicable_Common_Name: green plants
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Streptophyta
Applicable_Common_Name: land plants
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superdivision
Taxon_Rank_Value: Embryophyta
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Division
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tracheophyta
Applicable_Common_Name: vascular plants
Applicable_Common_Name: tracheophytes
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subdivision
Taxon_Rank_Value: Spermatophytina
Applicable_Common_Name: spermatophytes
Applicable_Common_Name: seed plants
Applicable_Common_Name: phanérogames
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnoliopsida
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
Taxon_Rank_Value: Asteranae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ericales
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ericaceae
Applicable_Common_Name: heaths
Applicable_Common_Name: éricacées
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vaccinium
Applicable_Common_Name: blueberries
Applicable_Common_Name: huckleberry
Applicable_Common_Name: blueberry
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vaccinium parvifolium
Applicable_Common_Name: red huckleberry
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Gaultheria
Applicable_Common_Name: snowberry
Applicable_Common_Name: wintergreen
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Gaultheria shallon
Applicable_Common_Name: shallal
Applicable_Common_Name: salal
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rosanae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sapindales
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sapindaceae
Applicable_Common_Name: soapberries
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Acer
Applicable_Common_Name: maples
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Acer circinatum
Applicable_Common_Name: vine maple
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Acer glabrum
Applicable_Common_Name: California mountain maple
Applicable_Common_Name: Douglas' maple
Applicable_Common_Name: dwarf maple
Applicable_Common_Name: mountain maple
Applicable_Common_Name: New Mexico maple
Applicable_Common_Name: Sierra maple
Applicable_Common_Name: Rocky Mountain maple
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Acer macrophyllum
Applicable_Common_Name: bigleaf maple
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinopsida
Applicable_Common_Name: conifers
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinidae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinales
Applicable_Common_Name: pines
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinaceae
Applicable_Common_Name: pines
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Abies
Applicable_Common_Name: fir
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Abies procera
Applicable_Common_Name: red fir
Applicable_Common_Name: white fir
Applicable_Common_Name: noble fir
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Abies grandis
Applicable_Common_Name: white fir
Applicable_Common_Name: silver fir
Applicable_Common_Name: giant fir
Applicable_Common_Name: lowland white fir
Applicable_Common_Name: yellow fir
Applicable_Common_Name: grand fir
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinus
Applicable_Common_Name: pine
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinus monticola
Applicable_Common_Name: western white pine
Applicable_Common_Name: Idaho white pine
Applicable_Common_Name: mountain white pine
Applicable_Common_Name: silver pine
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pseudotsuga
Applicable_Common_Name: Douglas-fir
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pseudotsuga menziesii
Applicable_Common_Name: red fir
Applicable_Common_Name: Douglas spruce
Applicable_Common_Name: Oregon pine
Applicable_Common_Name: Douglas-fir
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Cupressaceae
Applicable_Common_Name: cypress
Applicable_Common_Name: redwood
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Thuja
Applicable_Common_Name: arborvitae
Applicable_Common_Name: cèdre
Applicable_Common_Name: thuya
Applicable_Common_Name: red cedar
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Thuja plicata
Applicable_Common_Name: western red cedar
Applicable_Common_Name: western redcedar
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:

Harrington, Constance A. 2019. Response of overstory trees and understory regeneration to a green-tree retention harvest as part of the Spearfish Timber Sale, Wind River Experimental Forest. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2019-0024
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: David Thornton
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
Contact_Position: Information Technology Specialist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 3625 93rd Ave SW
City: Olympia
State_or_Province: WA
Postal_Code: 98512
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 360-754-5372
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address: dave.thornton@usda.gov
Contact Instructions: *prefers contact via email
Data_Set_Credit:
This project was funded by the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Buermeyer, Karl R.
Originator: Harrington, Constance A.
Publication_Date: 2002
Title:
Fate of overstory trees and patterns of regeneration 12 years after clearcutting with reserve trees in southwest Washington
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Western Journal of Applied Forestry
Issue_Identification: 17(2): 78-85
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Williamson, Richard L.
Publication_Date: 1966
Title:
Thinning response in 110-year-old Douglas-fir
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Research Note
Issue_Identification: RN-PNW-36
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Portland, OR
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station
Other_Citation_Details:
7 p.
Online_Linkage: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/40684
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Williamson, Richard L.
Publication_Date: 1982
Title:
Response to commercial thinning in a 110-year-old Douglas-fir stand
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Research Paper
Issue_Identification: PNW- RP-296
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Portland, OR
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station
Other_Citation_Details:
16 p.
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-RP-296
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
Measurements were taken by trained, experienced field crews; however, field measurements were not verified unless triggered by data editing programs.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
Data were edited for inconsistencies via specialized data summary programs and plotting repeat or related measurements (such as height at time A versus height at time B or tree diameter versus tree height) and field checked if appropriate (e.g., tree height appeared to have shrunk from the previous measurement and a condition code such as dead top was not recorded). Data on tree location were plotted in GIS and evaluated for reasonableness; field checking was done as needed to resolve apparent inconsistencies.
Completeness_Report:
Missing data are denoted by blank cells. Actual missing data were the result of either the tree being missing or human error of omitting the measurement. Some measurements such as heights were subsampled.
Lineage:
Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Field
Methodology_Description:
SAMPLING DESIGN

The 15 hectare (ha) harvest unit (in Panther Creek Division of the Wind River Experimental Forest) where this study was conducted, was part of the Spearfish timber sale. This even-aged, predominantly Douglas-fir stand originated after a wildfire around 1840, and potentially additional fires before that event. The study area included two of the nine blocks from a study begun in 1952 to study responses to various densities of commercial thinning (Williamson 1966, 1982). These two blocks are referred to as light thinning and heavy thinning (Buermeyer and Harrington 2002).

Concurrent with the overstory tree measurement in 1998, a 100 x 100 meter (1 ha) plot was established to monitor the size and distribution of the regeneration. It was positioned midslope, halfway between the access road on the west side of the unit and the eastern edge of the stand (minimum distance to the stand edge was about 60 meters). The plot was bisected by the boundary of the two former thinning treatment blocks to represent the two thinning densities equally and have both portions of the plot occupy similar slope positions.


DATA COLLECTION

Spearfish_15ha_tree_data:
Heights and diameters of all 267 residual overstory trees in the 15 hectare harvest unit were measured in August 1989. The overstory trees were measured using diameter tapes and laser height measuring equipment. All surviving overstory trees were remeasured in fall 1998, 12 years after harvest. Diameter and tree condition were recorded for all overstory trees, and height and height-to-live-crown were measured with a sonar hypsometer on a subset of 60 trees.

A subset of the live trees that were on a 1 ha block, positioned halfway between the road on the west and the eastern edge of the stand and positioned to be bisected by the thinning treatment in 1952, were chosen and increment cores were taken. For these 18 trees, the growth increment was recorded for 10 years before the 1986 harvest and at 3 year intervals from 1987 through 1998. (Note: there were 19 trees in the beginning, but we do not know if the 19th tree was not cored or if the core was not useable.)

Spearfish_1ha_seedlings_xy and Spearfish_1ha_shrub_skids:
The approximate location of all conifer regeneration, overstory trees, skid roads, down trees, and significant shrub clumps (defined as clumps of apparent size and density to exclude conifer regeneration) were mapped October 20-22, 1998. As the regeneration was mapped, each seedling was coded as to species and height class. (See \Supplements\Spearfish_1ha_map_seedling_size.jpg and \Supplements\Spearfish_1ha_map_seedling_species.jpg for a visual of the 100 x 100 meter plot as well as the location and species of these seedlings.)
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Buermeyer, Karl R.
Originator: Harrington, Constance A.
Publication_Date: 2002
Title:
Fate of overstory trees and patterns of regeneration 12 years after clearcutting with reserve trees in southwest Washington
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Western Journal of Applied Forestry
Issue_Identification: 17(2): 78-85
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Williamson, Richard L.
Publication_Date: 1966
Title:
Thinning response in 110-year-old Douglas-fir
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Research Note
Issue_Identification: RN-PNW-36
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Portland, OR
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station
Other_Citation_Details:
7 p.
Online_Linkage: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/40684
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Williamson, Richard L.
Publication_Date: 1982
Title:
Response to commercial thinning in a 110-year-old Douglas-fir stand
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Research Paper
Issue_Identification: PNW- RP-296
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Portland, OR
Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station
Other_Citation_Details:
16 p.
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/PNW-RP-296
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Spearfish_1ha_shrub_skids:
In the office, the field mapping sheets were used to create a point layer and a polygon layer for use in ArcView (a geographic information system program). The point layer included all tree locations, and the polygon layer included shrub clumps and skid roads. Examination of the spatial data indicated that ground mapping had missed portions of skid trails that had partially overgrown; thus, the locations of the skid trails were redigitized based on the 1988 aerial photograph.
Process_Date: 2018
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Below you will find the data and supplemental files available in this data publication and a short description of its contents.

DATA FILES

\Data\Codes_Damage.pdf: Adobe Acrobat PDF/a file containing a description of the codes used to describe the tree damage found in these data files.


\Data\Spearfish_1ha_seedlings_xy.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing information regarding all trees (overstory + understory) and includes size class, x, and y coordinates (exported from the corresponding shapefile: \Data\GIS\Tree_pt.shp) for the 1 ha study plot. Variables in this file are defined below.
TREE_PT_ = Arbitrary ID assigned to each mapped tree regeneration
SPECIES = Tree species (ABAM=bigleaf maple, ABGR=grand fir, ABPR=noble fir, PIMO=western white pine, PSME=Douglas-fir, TSHE=western redcedar)
SIZE = Tree height categories broken into 4 sizes (m=meters)
POINT_X = X coordinate of tree (meters) (from an arbitrary corner point)
POINT_Y = Y coordinate of tree (meters) (from an arbitrary corner point)


\Data\Spearfish_1ha_shrub_skids.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing XY coordinates for the vertices that make up the polygons representing shrub patches, skid trails, and areas with bare ground (exported from the corresponding shapefile: \Data\GIS\poly_features.shp) for the 1 hectare (ha) study plot. Variables in this file are defined below.
FID = Standard ArcMap unique identifier for each vertice
AREA = Area of associated polygon (square meters)
PERIMETER = Perimeter of associated polygon (square meters)
POLY_FEA_1 = Unique identifier before being placed into ArcGIS
POLYTHEME = Category of polygon being drawn (ACCI=Acer circinatum – Vine Maple, BARE=Exposed mineral soil, DOUGLAS-MAPLE= Acer glabrum, GASH/VAPA= Gaultheria shallon – Salal / Vaccinium parvifolium – Red Huckleberry, LOG= Down log, SKID TRAIL=Pathway created by dragging felled trees or logs)
POINT_X = X coordinate of vertice (meters)
POINT_Y = Y coordinate of vertice (meters)


\Data\Spearfish_15ha_tree_data.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing the 1989 and 1998 tree height and diameter measurements data from the 15 hectare unit of the Spearfish study. Also included are diameter at breast height growth increases in 3 year increments from 1977-1998 measured from increment cores for a subset of the live trees. Variables in this file are defined below.
PLOT = Ranger District Unit Sale number assigned
PAGE = Page number of field sheet of measurements
TAG = Tag number which has been nailed or stapled to this particular tree on the plot
TREE = Sequence of data entered from field sheets
DBH89_in = 1989 Diameter at breast height (inches)
DBH89_cm = 1989 diameter at breast height (centimeters)
HEIGHT89_ft = 1989 height (feet)
HT89_m = 1989 height (meters)
COM89 = 1989 comments
DBH98_cm = 1998 diameter at breast height (centimeters)
HT98_m = 1998 height (meters) measured with a sonar hypsometer (only a subset of 60 trees were measured)
HLC98_m = 1998 height to live crown (meters) with a sonar hypsometer (only a subset of 60 trees were measured)
GRINC9698 = Diameter at breast height growth increases in 3 year increments (1996-1998), measured from increment core (centimeters)
GRINC9395 = Diameter at breast height growth increases in 3 year increments (1993-1995), measured from increment core (centimeters)
GRINC9092 = Diameter at breast height growth increases in 3 year increments (1990-1992), measured from increment core (centimeters)
GRINC8789 = Diameter at breast height growth increases in 3 year increments (1987-1989), measured from increment core (centimeters)
GRINC7786 = Diameter at breast height growth increases in 3 year increments (1977-1986), measured from increment core (centimeters)
DAMA98 = Type of tree damage at end of the 1998 growing season (See \Data\Codes_Damage.pdf)
SVA98 = Severity of tree damage at end of the 1998 growing season (See \Data\Codes_Damage.pdf)
RECA98 = Recency of damage in 1998 (See \Data\Codes_Damage.pdf)
DAMB98 = Additional type of tree damage at end of the 1998 growing season, if applicable (See \Data\Codes_Damage.pdf)
SVB98 = Additional severity of tree damage at end of the 1998 growing season, if applicable (See \Data\Codes_Damage.pdf)
RECB98 = Additional recency of damage in 1998, if applicable (See \Data\Codes_Damage.pdf)
THIN52 = Intensity of thinning in 1952 (H=heavy, L=light) (blank cell means unknown/unsure)
COM98 = 1998 comments


\Data\GIS\poly_features.shp: Shapefile (and associated files) containing the polygons representing shrub patches, skid trails, and areas with bare ground for the 1 hectare (ha) study plot. (These data were exported and are also available as a CSV file: \Data\Spearfish_1ha_shrub_skids.csv.) Variables in this file are defined below.
FID = Standard ArcMap unique identifier for each vertice
SHAPE = Shape type (Polygon)
AREA = Area of associated polygon (square meters)
PERIMETER = Perimeter of associated polygon (square meters)
POLY_FEA_1 = Unique identifier before being placed into ArcGIS
POLYTHEME = Category of polygon being drawn (ACCI=Acer circinatum – Vine Maple, BARE=Exposed mineral soil, DOUGLAS-MAPLE= Acer glabrum, GASH/VAPA= Gaultheria shallon – Salal / Vaccinium parvifolium – Red Huckleberry, LOG= Down log, SKID TRAIL=Pathway created by dragging felled trees or logs)

\Data\GIS\Tree_pt.shp: Shapefile (and associated files) containing information regarding all trees (overstory + understory) and includes size class for the 1 ha study plot. (These data were exported and are also available as a CSV file: \Data\Spearfish_1ha_seedlings_xy.csv.) Variables in this file are defined below.
FID = Standard ArcMap unique identifier for each vertice
SHAPE = Shape type (Point)
TREE_PT_ = Arbitrary ID assigned to each mapped tree regeneration
SPECIES = Tree species (ABAM=bigleaf maple, ABGR=grand fir, ABPR=noble fir, PIMO=western white pine, PSME=Douglas-fir, TSHE=western redcedar)
SIZE = Tree height categories broken into 4 sizes (m=meters)
TAG_NO = Tag number (‘0’=untagged trees)
MARKERSIZE = Zize of marker, which is related to the SIZE variable
POINT_X = X coordinate of tree (meters)
POINT_Y = Y coordinate of tree (meters)


SUPPLEMENTAL FILES

\Supplements\Spearfish_1ha_map_seedling_size.jpg: JPEG file containing the 100 x 100 meter grid (1 hectare), broken up into 10 x 10 m cells, showing the different sizes of all seedlings measured (source: \Data\GIS\Tree_pt.shp).

\Supplements\Spearfish_1ha_map_seedling_species.jpg: JPEG file containing the 100 x 100 meter grid (1 hectare), broken up into 10 x 10 m cells, showing the different species of all seedlings measured (source: \Data\GIS\Tree_pt.shp).

\Supplements\Spearfish_1ha_map_shrub_skids.jpg: JPEG file containing the 100 x 100 meter grid (1 hectare), broken up into 10 x 10 m cells, showing shrub clumps, skid trails, logs, etc. on this study unit (source: \Data\GIS\poly_features.shp).
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
Buermeyer, Karl R.; Harrington, Constance A. 2002. Fate of overstory trees and patterns of regeneration 12 years after clearcutting with reserve trees in southwest Washington. Western Journal of Applied Forestry 17(2): 78-85
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Research and Development
Contact_Position: Research Data Archivist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 240 West Prospect Road
City: Fort Collins
State_or_Province: CO
Postal_Code: 80526
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: see Contact Instructions
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as of June 2019. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
Resource_Description: RDS-2019-0024
Distribution_Liability:
Metadata documents have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Unless otherwise stated, all data and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. However, neither the author, the Archive, nor any part of the federal government can assure the reliability or suitability of these data for a particular purpose. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed for a user's application of these data or related materials.

The metadata, data, or related materials may be updated without notification. If a user believes errors are present in the metadata, data or related materials, please use the information in (1) Identification Information: Point of Contact, (2) Metadata Reference: Metadata Contact, or (3) Distribution Information: Distributor to notify the author or the Archive of the issues.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ASCII
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
Format_Specification:
Comma-delimited ASCII text file (CSV)
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 18.05
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2019-0024
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: JPG
Format_Version_Number: see Format specification
Format_Specification:
Joint Photographic Experts Group file
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 18.05
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2019-0024
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: PDF
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
Format_Specification:
Adobe Acrobat PDF/a file
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 18.05
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2019-0024
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: SHP
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
Format_Specification:
Shapefile
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 18.05
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2019-0024
Fees: None
Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20190604
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Constance Harrington
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 3625 93rd Ave SW
City: Olympia
State_or_Province: WA
Postal_Code: 98512
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 360-753-7670
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999
Back to Top