Fernow Experimental Forest overstory tree and regeneration data from the "Financial Maturity" study
Metadata:
-
Identification_Information:
-
-
Citation:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Thomas-Van Gundy, Melissa A.
-
Originator: Schuler, Thomas M.
-
Originator: Wood, Frederica
-
Publication_Date: 2020
-
Title:
Fernow Experimental Forest overstory tree and regeneration data from the "Financial Maturity" study- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
- Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0015
-
Description:
-
-
Abstract:
- This data publication contains overstory and sapling tree tallies, woody stem regeneration tallies, and butt-log tree quality data collected from 1970 to 2016 on the Fernow Experimental Forest in West Virginia. These data were collected for the Financial Maturity (FM) study. Three treatments having different financial rate of return goals (3 percent, 4 percent and 6 percent rate of return) were assigned to six study areas. Harvest treatments occurred approximately every 10 years with 4 or 5 treatments completed per study area over the study period.
-
Purpose:
- The Financial Maturity (FM) study was designed to apply the selection marking procedures developed by Trimble, Mendel and Kennell (1974) incorporating economic guidelines into the individual-tree selection silvicultural method commonly used in Appalachian hardwood forests. Tree selection for harvesting would be based on financial rate-of-return goals such that each 10-year harvest would be profitable and also leave a residual stand of sufficient stocking (basal area) and vigor. Trees removed generally were those growing at a rate less than the desired rate of return and included nonmerchantable trees of poor quality. These datasets are used by USDA Forest Service scientists, staff, and cooperators in support of research in silviculture, forest management, forest economics, and forest ecology in the central Appalachian region and inter-regional comparisons.
-
Supplemental_Information:
- The Fernow FM study has been documented in numerous unpublished Forest Service study plans, establishment reports, progress reports, and descriptions of treatments. Important information from those documents are provided in detail in these metadata while scanned versions of original documents of particular relevance are included as supplemental information with the full data product download.
-
Time_Period_of_Content:
-
-
Time_Period_Information:
-
-
Range_of_Dates/Times:
-
-
Beginning_Date: 1970
-
Ending_Date: 2016
-
Currentness_Reference:
- Ground condition
-
Status:
-
-
Progress: Complete
-
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
-
Spatial_Domain:
-
-
Description_of_Geographic_Extent:
- The Fernow Experimental Forest (FEF) is located on the Monongahela National Forest in Tucker County, West Virginia approximately 2 miles southeast of Parsons, West Virginia. The FM study on the FEF includes compartments 20B, 26A, 26B, 31, 60 and 61.
-
Bounding_Coordinates:
-
-
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -79.69966714
-
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -79.6771101
-
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 39.0708613
-
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 39.0304484
-
Bounding_Altitudes:
-
Altitude_Minimum: 680
-
Altitude_Maximum: 960
-
Altitude_Distance_Units: meters
-
Keywords:
-
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
-
Theme_Keyword: biota
-
Theme_Keyword: environment
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: National Research & Development Taxonomy
-
Theme_Keyword: Forest & Plant Health
-
Theme_Keyword: Forest Products
-
Theme_Keyword: Inventory, Monitoring, & Analysis
-
Theme_Keyword: Assessments
-
Theme_Keyword: Natural Resource Management & Use
-
Theme_Keyword: Forest management
-
Theme_Keyword: Restoration
-
Theme_Keyword: Timber
-
Theme:
-
-
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
-
Theme_Keyword: silviculture
-
Theme_Keyword: species composition
-
Theme_Keyword: forest stand dynamics
-
Theme_Keyword: tree regeneration
-
Theme_Keyword: stand growth
-
Theme_Keyword: tree quality
-
Theme_Keyword: mixed hardwoods
-
Theme_Keyword: financial rate of return
-
Place:
-
-
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
-
Place_Keyword: Fernow Experimental Forest
-
Place_Keyword: West Virginia
-
Place_Keyword: Monongahela National Forest
-
Place_Keyword: Central Appalachian Mountains
-
Place_Keyword: Allegheny Mountains
-
Taxonomy:
-
Keywords/Taxon:
-
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus:
- None
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: plants
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: vegetation
-
Taxonomic_Keywords: multiple species
-
Taxonomic_System:
-
Classification_System/Authority:
-
Classification_System_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: ITIS
-
Publication_Date: 2020
-
Title:
Integrated Taxonomic Information System- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: database
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Retrieved [February, 26, 2020]
- Online_Linkage: https://www.itis.gov
-
Taxonomic_Procedures:
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Plantae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: plantes
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Planta
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Vegetal
-
Applicable_Common_Name: plants
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subkingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Viridiplantae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: green plants
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Streptophyta
-
Applicable_Common_Name: land plants
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superdivision
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Embryophyta
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Division
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tracheophyta
-
Applicable_Common_Name: vascular plants
-
Applicable_Common_Name: tracheophytes
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subdivision
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Spermatophytina
-
Applicable_Common_Name: spermatophytes
-
Applicable_Common_Name: seed plants
-
Applicable_Common_Name: phanérogames
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnoliopsida
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Asteranae
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ericales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ericaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: heaths
-
Applicable_Common_Name: éricacées
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vaccinium
-
Applicable_Common_Name: blueberries
-
Applicable_Common_Name: huckleberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: blueberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Kalmia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: kalmia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: laurel
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Kalmia latifolia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mountain laurel
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Oxydendrum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sourwood
-
Applicable_Common_Name: swamp cranberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Oxydendrum arboreum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sourwood
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sorrel tree
-
Applicable_Common_Name: lily-of-the-valley tree
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rhododendron
-
Applicable_Common_Name: azaleas
-
Applicable_Common_Name: rhododendron
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rhododendron calendulaceum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: flame azalea
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Cornales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Hydrangeaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hydrangeas
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Hydrangea
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hydrangea
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Hydrangea arborescens
-
Applicable_Common_Name: smooth hydrangea
-
Applicable_Common_Name: wild hydrangea
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Cornaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: dogwoods
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Cornus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: dogwood
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Cornus florida
-
Applicable_Common_Name: flowering dogwood
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Cornus alternifolia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: alternate-leaf dogwood
-
Applicable_Common_Name: alternateleaf dogwood
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Nyssaceae
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Nyssa
-
Applicable_Common_Name: tupelo
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Nyssa sylvatica
-
Applicable_Common_Name: black gum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: black tupelo
-
Applicable_Common_Name: blackgum
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Lamiales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Oleaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: olives
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fraxinus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: ash
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fraxinus americana
-
Applicable_Common_Name: white ash
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Dipsacales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Adoxaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: adoxas
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Viburnum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: viburnum
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Viburnum acerifolium
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mapleleaf viburnum
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sambucus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: elderberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sambucus nigra
-
Applicable_Common_Name: European black elder
-
Applicable_Common_Name: European elderberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: European black elderberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: elder
-
Applicable_Common_Name: elderberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: common elderberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: black elderberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subspecies
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sambucus nigra ssp. canadensis
-
Applicable_Common_Name: elder
-
Applicable_Common_Name: elderberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Mexican elderberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: blue elder
-
Applicable_Common_Name: common elderberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American black elderberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Apiales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Araliaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: ginseng
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aralia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: spikenard
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aralia spinosa
-
Applicable_Common_Name: devils walkingstick
-
Applicable_Common_Name: angelicatree
-
Applicable_Common_Name: devil's walkingstick
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aquifoliales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aquifoliaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hollies
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ilex
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hollies
-
Applicable_Common_Name: holly
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ilex montana
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mountain winterberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mountain holly
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Lilianae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: monocots
-
Applicable_Common_Name: monocotyledons
-
Applicable_Common_Name: monocotylédones
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Liliales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Smilacaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: catbrier
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Smilax
-
Applicable_Common_Name: common greenbriar
-
Applicable_Common_Name: greenbriar
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sarsaparilla
-
Applicable_Common_Name: catbrier
-
Applicable_Common_Name: greenbrier
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnolianae
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnoliales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnoliaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: magnolias
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnolia
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnolia acuminata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cucumbertree
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cucumber-tree
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnolia fraseri
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Fraser's magnolia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mountain magnolia
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Liriodendron
-
Applicable_Common_Name: tuliptree
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Liriodendron tulipifera
-
Applicable_Common_Name: yellow poplar
-
Applicable_Common_Name: tulip poplar
-
Applicable_Common_Name: yellow-poplar
-
Applicable_Common_Name: tuliptree
-
Applicable_Common_Name: bois-jaune
-
Applicable_Common_Name: tulip-poplar
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Piperales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aristolochiaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: birthworts
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aristolochia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: dutchman's pipe
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Aristolochia macrophylla
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pipevine
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Laurales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Lauraceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: laurels
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Lindera
-
Applicable_Common_Name: spicebush
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Lindera benzoin
-
Applicable_Common_Name: spicebush
-
Applicable_Common_Name: northern spicebush
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sassafras
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sassafras
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sassafras albidum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sassafras
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rosanae
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fagales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Juglandaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: walnuts
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Carya
-
Applicable_Common_Name: caryer
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hickory
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Carya cordiformis
-
Applicable_Common_Name: bitternut hickory
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pignut
-
Applicable_Common_Name: noyer amer
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Carya ovata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: shagbark hickory
-
Applicable_Common_Name: caryer ovale
-
Applicable_Common_Name: noyer tendre
-
Applicable_Common_Name: shellbark hickory
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Juglans
-
Applicable_Common_Name: nogal
-
Applicable_Common_Name: walnut
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Juglans cinerea
-
Applicable_Common_Name: noyer cendré
-
Applicable_Common_Name: white walnut
-
Applicable_Common_Name: butternut
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fagaceae
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: chêne
-
Applicable_Common_Name: oak
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus falcata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: southern red oak
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus montana
-
Applicable_Common_Name: chestnut oak
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus coccinea
-
Applicable_Common_Name: scarlet oak
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus alba
-
Applicable_Common_Name: chêne blanc
-
Applicable_Common_Name: white oak
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus rubra
-
Applicable_Common_Name: northern red oak
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus velutina
-
Applicable_Common_Name: black oak
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Castanea
-
Applicable_Common_Name: chestnut
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Castanea dentata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American chestnut
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fagus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: beech
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fagus grandifolia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American beech
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Betulaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: alder
-
Applicable_Common_Name: birch
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Betula
-
Applicable_Common_Name: birch
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Betula alleghaniensis
-
Applicable_Common_Name: yellow birch
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Betula lenta
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sweet birch
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Carpinus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hornbeam
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Carpinus caroliniana
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American hornbeam
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ostrya
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hophornbeam
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ostrya virginiana
-
Applicable_Common_Name: eastern hophornbeam
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hophornbeam
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Malvales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Malvaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mallows
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mauves
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tilia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: basswood
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tilia americana
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American basswood
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rosales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ulmaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: elms
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ulmus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: elm
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ulmus rubra
-
Applicable_Common_Name: slippery elm
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Moraceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mulberries
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Morus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mulberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Morus rubra
-
Applicable_Common_Name: red mulberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rosaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: roses
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Crataegus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hawthorns
-
Applicable_Common_Name: aubépines
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Prunus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: chokecherry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: plum
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Prunus serotina
-
Applicable_Common_Name: black chokecherry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: black cherry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Prunus pensylvanica
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pin cherry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: fire cherry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rubus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: framboises
-
Applicable_Common_Name: ronces
-
Applicable_Common_Name: brambles
-
Applicable_Common_Name: blackberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rubus allegheniensis
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Allegheny blackberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Amelanchier
-
Applicable_Common_Name: serviceberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Amelanchier arborea
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Allegheny serviceberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: apple shadbush
-
Applicable_Common_Name: downy serviceberry
-
Applicable_Common_Name: shadblow
-
Applicable_Common_Name: common serviceberry
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Malus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: apple
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sorbus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: mountain-ash
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sorbus americana
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American mountain-ash
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sapindales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Sapindaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: soapberries
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Acer
-
Applicable_Common_Name: maples
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Acer rubrum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: red maple
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Acer saccharum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sugar maple
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Acer pensylvanicum
-
Applicable_Common_Name: moosewood
-
Applicable_Common_Name: striped maple
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Anacardiaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cashews
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rhus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: sumac
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fabales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fabaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: peas
-
Applicable_Common_Name: legumes
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Robinia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: locust
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Robinia pseudoacacia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: black locust
-
Applicable_Common_Name: false acacia
-
Applicable_Common_Name: yellow locust
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Malpighiales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Salicaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: willows
-
Applicable_Common_Name: saules
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Populus
-
Applicable_Common_Name: cottonwood
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Populus tremuloides
-
Applicable_Common_Name: quaking aspen
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Populus grandidentata
-
Applicable_Common_Name: bigtooth aspen
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vitales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vitaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: grapes
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vitis
-
Applicable_Common_Name: grape
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Saxifraganae
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Saxifragales
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Hamamelidaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: witch hazel
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Hamamelis
-
Applicable_Common_Name: witchhazel
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Hamamelis virginiana
-
Applicable_Common_Name: witch-hazel
-
Applicable_Common_Name: witchhazel
-
Applicable_Common_Name: American witchhazel
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinopsida
-
Applicable_Common_Name: conifers
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinidae
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinales
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pines
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinaceae
-
Applicable_Common_Name: pines
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tsuga
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hemlock
-
Taxonomic_Classification:
-
-
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
-
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tsuga canadensis
-
Applicable_Common_Name: Canada hemlock
-
Applicable_Common_Name: hemlock spruce
-
Applicable_Common_Name: eastern hemlock
-
Access_Constraints: None
-
Use_Constraints:
- These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:
Thomas-Van Gundy, Melissa A.; Schuler, Thomas M.; Wood, Frederica. 2020. Fernow Experimental Forest overstory tree and regeneration data from the "Financial Maturity" study. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0015
-
Point_of_Contact:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Person_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Person: Frederica Wood
-
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
-
Contact_Position: Fernow Experimental Forest Data Manager
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing
-
Address: Timber & Watershd Laboratory
-
Address: PO Box 404
-
City: Parsons
-
State_or_Province: WV
-
Postal_Code: 26287
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: physical
-
Address: Timber & Watershed Laboratory
-
Address: 459 Nursery Bottom Road
-
City: Parsons
-
State_or_Province: WV
-
Postal_Code: 26287
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 304-478-2000 x128
-
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
frederica.wood@usda.gov
-
Browse_Graphic:
-
-
Browse_Graphic_File_Name:
\Supplements\Fernow_FM_map.jpg
-
Browse_Graphic_File_Description:
- Map showing Financial Maturity study locations in compartments 20B, 26A, 26B, 31, 60 and 61 on the Fernow Experimental Forest.
-
Browse_Graphic_File_Type: JPEG
-
Data_Set_Credit:
- Funding for this study provided by USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
-
Cross_Reference:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Trimble, George R., Jr.
-
Originator: Mendel, Joseph J.
-
Originator: Kennell, Richard A.
-
Publication_Date: 1974
-
Title:
A procedure for selection marking in hardwoods combining silvicultural considerations with economic guidelines- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Research Paper
- Issue_Identification: NE-292
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Upper Darby, PA
- Publisher: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
- Other_Citation_Details:
- 13 p.
- Online_Linkage: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/15400
-
Cross_Reference:
-
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Schuler, Thomas M.
-
Originator: McGill, Daivd W.
-
Publication_Date: 2007
-
Title:
Long-term assessment of financial maturity, diameter-limit selection in the central Appalachians- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Research Paper
- Issue_Identification: NRS-2
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Newtown Square, PA
- Publisher: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
- Other_Citation_Details:
- 16 p.
- Online_Linkage: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/19088
- Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/NRS-RP-2
Back to Top
-
Data_Quality_Information:
-
-
Attribute_Accuracy:
-
-
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
- Tree species were identified and measurements collected in the field by experienced forestry personnel using standard equipment such as diameter tapes, abney levels, and clinometers. Field data sheets were reviewed and summarized in the office and the results checked for accuracy by a second person. Computer programs for data entry developed in the 1980s were used to convert all original paper-based tally data to digital format, including all data collected before the programs were developed (i.e., 1970-1980). Digital data were checked for accuracy by the project data manager.
-
Logical_Consistency_Report:
- Standard operating procedures were established for the Fernow Experimental Forest (FEF) in 1949 which detailed how field measurements were collected. Additional recordkeeping instructions were developed by the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station in 1954 and incorporated into the FEF management and working plans. Revised FEF-specific standard field operating procedures were documented by Trimble in 1969 just prior to initiation of the FM study.
Basic measurements for overstory tree tallies have been unchanged since 1953. Tree quality data collection has followed the Station guidelines since 1954. Methods for sapling and regeneration tallies have been revised over time, and those changes are detailed in the Methodology citation section.
-
Completeness_Report:
- Overstory tree tallies were completed prior to harvesting at study initiation and approximately every 10 years through year 30 (compartments 20B, 60 and 61) or year 40 (compartments 26A, 26B and 31). Measurement years for each compartment were:
20B - 1977, 1987, 1996, 2006
26A - 1971, 1981, 1991, 2005, 2014
26B - 1970, 1981, 1991, 2005, 2014
31 - 1972, 1982, 1993, 2004, 2013
60 - 1981, 1991, 2004, 2012
61 - 1983, 1993, 2005, 2014
Harvest treatments and preharvest measurements due in 2001 in compartments 26A, 26B and 60 were delayed for 3 or 4 years due to administrative constraints. The treatment and measurements due in 2003 in compartment 61 also were delayed 2 years.
Sapling tallies were completed on an irregular schedule with 3 or 4 measurements per compartment during the study period. Measurement years for each compartment were:
20B - 1977, 1987, 1993, 1996
26A - 1981, 1991, 2016
26B - 1981, 1991, 2016
31 - 1982, 1992, 1997
60 - 1987, 1991, 2012, 2016
61 - 1993, 1999, 2016
Regeneration data were collected on the same measurement schedule as the sapling tallies since study initiation. For the regeneration measurements woody shrub and vine species also were tallied with all tree species.
Tree quality data have been collected for harvested trees at each 10-year treatment interval. Collection of tree quality data for a sample of unharvested trees occurred once in 2 compartments - compartment 20B in 1987 and compartment 61 in 1993.
-
Lineage:
-
Methodology:
-
Methodology_Type: Field
-
Methodology_Description:
- STUDY DESIGN
The Financial Maturity (FM) study took place on the Fernow Experimental Forest in West Virginia and included six study areas, referred to as compartments. Four study compartments established in the early 1950s were reassigned to the FM study in 1970 and two additional FM study compartments were established at that time. One of three financial rate of return goals (3 percent, 4 percent and 6 percent) were assigned to two treatment areas each. All six areas had very similar northern red oak site indices ranging from 70 to 73. Trees in each treatment area were selected for harvest at each cycle based on the marking guidelines developed by Trimble and others and published in 1974. The original marking guidelines were followed consistently in each compartment for the duration of the study.
Trimble et al. (1974) also developed guidelines for removal of nonmerchantable trees greater than 11 inches in diameter at breast height (dbh; at 4.5 feet above the ground on the uphill side of the tree). Nonmerchantable (or cull) trees included those with significant rot in the butt log, low-vigor trees, some trees with butt-log grade 4 or 5, and trees of short-lived species (e.g., black locust or sassafras). These "improvement" harvests occurred concurrently with the FM harvests when nonmerchantable trees were present.
The 3 percent financial rate of return treatment was assigned to compartments 31 (18.8 acres) and 61 (118.4 acres).
The 4 percent financial rate of return treatment was assigned to compartments 20B (25.3 acres) and 60 (31.0 acres).
The 6 percent financial rate of return treatment was assigned to compartments 26A (32.1 acres) and 26B (14.2 acres).
More details can be found in the documents included in the \Supplements folder.
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Trimble, George R., Jr.
-
Originator: Mendel, Joseph J.
-
Originator: Kennell, Richard A.
-
Publication_Date: 1974
-
Title:
A procedure for selection marking in hardwoods combining silvicultural considerations with economic guidelines- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Research Paper
- Issue_Identification: NE-292
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Upper Darby, PA
- Publisher: USDA Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
- Other_Citation_Details:
- 13 p.
- Online_Linkage: https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/15400
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Smith, Clay
-
Publication_Date: 1976
-
Title:
Establishment-Progress Report, Financial Rate of Return Areas on the Fernow Experimental Forest- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Parsons, WV
- Publisher: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Unpublished report; included in full data publication download (\Supplements\EstablishmentProgressReport_1976.pdf)
-
Methodology:
-
Methodology_Type: Field
-
Methodology_Description:
- CULTURAL TREATMENTS (NON-HARVEST)
Stand improvement treatments applied in the FEF FM study included cutting unmarked smaller-diameter cull trees (6 to 11 inches dbh) and grapevines.
Compartment 20B had culls cut or girdled at each harvest and grapevines cut at year 10.
Compartment 26A had culls cut or girdled at each harvest and grapevines cut at years 0 and 10.
Compartment 26B had culls cut or girdled at each harvest and grapevines cut at years 0, 10 and 20.
Compartment 31 had culls cut or girdled at each harvest and grapevines cut at years 0, 10 and 20.
Compartment 60 had culls cut or girdled at each harvest and grapevines cut at years 0 and 10.
Compartment 61 had culls cut or girdled at each harvest and grapevines cut at years 0 and 10.
-
Methodology:
-
Methodology_Type: Field
-
Methodology_Description:
- TALLIES
Overstory tree tallies: All trees greater than or equal to 5 inches dbh are counted by species, 2-inch diameter class, and vegetation class every 10 years on a variable number of 0.5-acre plots per compartment. The smallest 2-inch diameter class is 6 inches and includes all trees with dbh between 5.0 and 6.9 inches. The 3 vegetation classes are: merchantable, cull (deformed or rotten), and dead. Three standard types of overstory tree tallies are made for each treatment cycle: a tally of the compartment plots before treatment, a complete tally of all trees marked for harvest, and a complete tally of trees damaged during the logging operation. One nonstandard tally type was completed for one compartment in the FM study for salvage removal of downed trees due to a wind storm.
Sapling tallies: All trees greater than or equal to 1 inch dbh but less than 5 inches dbh are tallied by species and origin on a variable number of 1/100-acre plots. Individual tree dbh was measured and recorded. Origin was either seedling or sprout.
Regeneration tallies: All woody stems less than 1 inch dbh and at least 1 foot in height are tallied by species and origin on a variable number of 1/1000-acre plots. Tallies in 1996, 2012 and 2016 counted stems of any height with dbh less than 1 inch and classified stems into 5 height classes. Stems in height classes 3-5 correspond to those tallied in other years. Tallies included tree, woody shrub and vine species.
More details can be found in the documents included in the \Supplements folder.
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
-
Publication_Date: 1954
-
Title:
Record-keeping instructions for compartment experiments- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Upper Darby, PA
- Publisher: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Unpublished report; included in full data publication download (\Supplements\RecordKeepingInstrCompartmentExps_NEFES_1954.pdf)
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Trimble, G.R., Jr.
-
Publication_Date: 1969
-
Title:
Field Manual of Standard Operating Procedures for Large-Area Comparisons of Forest Management Practices in Appalachian Forest Types- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Parsons, WV
- Publisher: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Unpublished report; included in full data publication download (\Supplements\FernowEF_FieldStandardOperProcs_1969.pdf)
-
Methodology:
-
Methodology_Type: Field
-
Methodology_Description:
- TREE QUALITY
Tree quality measurements (also referred to as grade measurements) in the FEF FM study were made using 2 different sampling designs. To determine product suitability of the removed wood all sawtimber-sized (11 inches dbh and larger) merchantable trees marked for harvest were graded before each subsequent harvest. To estimate overall stand quality a sample of sawtimber-sized (11 inches dbh and larger) trees was graded in year 10 in compartments 20B and 61 at the same time the overstory tree tallies were completed.
Tree quality is measured for the butt log - the first 16 feet of the tree bole measured from the bottom. Six hardwood log grades were defined by the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station in 1954 (unpublished report) for use in timber compartment studies. The grades are: 1 = suitable for grade 1 standard lumber logs; 2 = suitable for grade 2 standard lumber logs but not for grade 1; 3 = suitable for grade 3 standard lumber logs but not meeting higher grade specifications; 4 = suitable for tie and timber logs but not for standard lumber logs; 5 = suitable for local use logs, sawbolts or pulpwood, but not for standard lumber or tie and timber logs; 6 = unsuitable for any of these products. Log grades 1, 2 and 3 are described in detail in Forest Products Laboratory Report 1737 (1959). Additional data recorded for each graded tree include species and 2-inch diameter class.
The sampling scheme used for stand quality measurements in the FEF FM study is based on tree diameter class. For compartment 20B in 1987 for the 12-inch to 18-inch dbh classes approximately 15 percent of trees tallied were graded. For trees larger than the 18-inch dbh class approximately 8 percent of tallied trees were graded. For compartment 61 in 1993 approximately 11 percent of all trees tallied in the 12-inch and larger dbh classes were graded.
More details can be found in the documents included in the \Supplements folder.
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
-
Publication_Date: 1954
-
Title:
Record-keeping instructions for compartment experiments- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Upper Darby, PA
- Publisher: Northeastern Forest Experiment Station
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Unpublished report; included in full data publication download (\Supplements\RecordKeepingInstrCompartmentExps_NEFES_1954.pdf)
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Forest Products Laboratory
-
Publication_Date: 1959
-
Title:
Hardwood log grades for standard lumber - proposals and results- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Series_Information:
- Series_Name: Report
- Issue_Identification: No. 1737
- Publication_Information:
- Publication_Place: Madison, WI
- Publisher: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory
- Other_Citation_Details:
- 67 p.
- Online_Linkage: https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/defaults/2227mt23r
-
Methodology_Citation:
-
Citation_Information:
-
-
Originator: Trimble, G.R., Jr.
-
Publication_Date: 1969
-
Title:
Field Manual of Standard Operating Procedures for Large-Area Comparisons of Forest Management Practices in Appalachian Forest Types- Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
- Other_Citation_Details:
- Unpublished report; included in full data publication download (\Supplements\FernowEF_FieldStandardOperProcs_1969.pdf)
-
Process_Step:
-
-
Process_Description:
- Field data were recorded on data forms by hand. BASIC programs developed in the 1980s were used for entry of all data collected (1970-2016) using standard operating procedures (SOPs). Where data collection did not follow an SOP the data were tabulated by hand and then entered with the BASIC program. Digital data were checked for accuracy by the project data manager.
-
Process_Date: 2016
-
Process_Step:
-
-
Process_Description:
- A BASIC program was used to aggregate the overstory trees tallied on each plot into total number of overstory trees tallied in each compartment at each measurement date.
-
Process_Date: 2016
-
Process_Step:
-
-
Process_Description:
- A BASIC program was used to aggregate cut tree tallies and logging damage tallies into total cut tallies (i.e., number of trees marked for harvest + number of trees felled due to logging damage = total number of trees removed). The program also was used to calculate residual tree tallies after treatment by subtracting the total cut tallies from the pretreatment measurement tallies.
-
Process_Date: 2016
-
Process_Step:
-
-
Process_Description:
- A BASIC program was used to aggregate the overstory tree tally data and export it to ASCII text files for each compartment and measurement date. SAS software programs (Copyright © 2019 SAS Institute Inc. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) were used to aggregate the sapling and regeneration tally data and export it to ASCII text files for each compartment. The ASCII text files were aggregated into one Excel spreadsheet file for each tally type for all compartments and all measurements.
A SAS software program was used to summarize the tree quality data by compartment, measurement type, and measurement date. The data were saved in an Excel spreadsheet file and as comma-delimited ASCII text files.
-
Process_Date: 2019
Back to Top
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
-
-
Overview_Description:
-
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
- This data publication contains four datasets (found in the \Data folder of full data publication download), and multiple additional informational files (found in the \Supplements folder of the full data publication download) which document the history of the FEF FM study.
Below is a summary list of the 4 data files, and then a detailed description of the variables each file contains.
DATA FILES:
1. Overstory tree tally data from 1970 to 2015 for all trees greater than or equal to 5 inches in diameter at breast height (dbh; 4.5 feet above ground on the uphill side of the tree) - variable number of 0.5-acre plots per compartment sampling design.
2. Regeneration woody stem tally data from 1977 to 2016 for stems less than 1 inch dbh - 1/1000-acre plot sampling.
3. Sapling woody stem tally data from 1977 to 2016 for stems 1 inch to less than 5 inches dbh - 1/100-acre plot sampling.
4. Tree quality data from 1971 to 2014 for trees greater than or equal to 11 inches dbh - variable sampling design.
1. \Data\FernowFM_Overstory_Trees5+inchDbh.csv is a comma-delimited ASCII text file containing overstory tree tally data from 1970 to 2015.
COMPARTMENT = research compartment where data were collected.
YEAR = year the data were collected.
MONTH = month the data were collected.
MEASURE_TYPE = type of data. Standard types are: original (at study establishment), remeasure (routine data collection at 10-year interval), cut (sum of trees selected for harvest and trees removed due to damage during logging operation), and residual (calculated tally after treatment). An additional measurement type of storm damage (salvage removal of downed trees after a high wind event) was used on compartment 60 in 1993.
VEG_CLASS = tree condition class at time of measurement. Classes are: merchantable, cull (deformed or rotten), and dead.
SPECIES_NAME = tree species name (genus and species). 'Sp.' indicates species not determined.
2INCH_DBH_CLASS = tree diameter class (inches). Example: 6 inch class includes trees with dbh from 5.0 inches to 6.9 inches.
NUMBER_STEMS = total number of trees.
2. \Data\FernowFM_Regen_WoodyStemsLess1inchDbh.csv is a comma-delimited ASCII text file containing regeneration woody stem tally data from 1977 to 2016.
COMPARTMENT = research compartment where data were collected.
YEAR = year the data were collected.
MONTH = month the data were collected.
SPECIES_NAME = woody stem species name (genus and species). 'Sp.' indicates species not determined.
NUMBER_SEEDLING = total number of woody stems of seedling origin.
NUMBER_SPROUT = total number of woody stems of sprout origin.
PLOT_FACTOR = plot expansion factor calculated as the inverse of the sum of the area sampled. (Example: 50 plots x 1/1000-acre per plot = 0.05 acres sampled. Plot factor = 1/0.05 = 20.00). Multiplying the tally number of stems by the plot factor equals number of stems per acre.
3. \Data\FernowFM_Sapling_WoodyStems1to5inchDbh.csv is a comma-delimited ASCII text file containing sapling-sized woody stem tally data from 1977 to 2016.
COMPARTMENT = research compartment where data were collected.
YEAR = year the data were collected.
MONTH = month the data were collected.
SPECIES_NAME = woody stem species name (genus and species). 'Sp.' indicates species not determined.
1INCH_DBH_CLASS = woody stem diameter class (inches). Example: 1 inch class includes trees with dbh from 1.0 inches to 1.9 inches.
NUMBER_SEEDLING = total number of woody stems of seedling origin.
NUMBER_SPROUT = total number of woody stems of sprout origin.
PLOT_FACTOR = plot expansion factor calculated as the inverse of the sum of the area sampled. (Example: 50 plots x 1/100-acre per plot = 0.5 acres sampled. Plot factor = 1/0.5 = 2.0). Multiplying the tally number of stems by the plot factor equals number of stems per acre.
4. \Data\FernowFM_TreeQual_Trees11+inchDbh.csv is a comma-delimited ASCII text file containing sawtimber-sized tree quality data from 1971 to 2014.
COMPARTMENT = research compartment where data were collected.
YEAR = year the data were collected.
MONTH = month the data were collected.
MEASURE_TYPE = type of data. Types are: remeasure (routine data collection at 10-year interval) or cut (trees selected for harvest).
SAMPLING_DESIGN = sampling scheme used to select trees to grade. Designs are: 100 percent (all trees are graded) or sample (a sample of trees is graded; see Methodology citation section for details on sample size).
SPECIES_NAME = tree species name (genus and species). 'Sp.' indicates species not determined.
2INCH_DBH_CLASS = tree diameter class (inches). Example: 12 inch class includes trees with dbh from 11.0 inches to 12.9 inches.
NUMBER_STEMS = total number of trees graded.
STEMS_GRADE1 = number of trees meeting grade 1 definition (see Methodology section for grade definitions).
STEMS_GRADE2 = number of trees meeting grade 2 definition.
STEMS_GRADE3 = number of trees meeting grade 3 definition.
STEMS_OTHER = total number of trees graded as 4, 5 or 6.
INFORMATIONAL FILES:
1. \Supplements\EstablishmentProgressReport_1976.pdf: Portable Document Format file containing a scan of the document "Establishment-Progress Report, Financial Rate of Return Areas on the Fernow Experimental Forest" authored by Clay Smith.
2. \Supplements\Fernow_FM_map.jpg: JPEG map showing locations and rate of return treatments for the six compartments included in the FM study on the Fernow Experimental Forest.
3. \Supplements\FernowEF_FieldStandardOperProcs_1969.pdf: Portable Document Format file containing a scan of the document "Field Manual of Standard Operating Procedures for Large-Area Comparisons of Forest Management Practices in Appalachian Forest Types" authored by G.R. Trimble, Jr.
4. \Supplements\RecordKeepingInstrCompartmentExps_NEFES_1954.pdf: Portable Document Format file containing a scan of the document "Record-Keeping Instructions for Compartment Experiments" authored by the Northeastern Forest Experiment Station.
-
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
- For more details on these data, see the Methodology citation section for additional documentation.
Back to Top
-
Distribution_Information:
-
-
Distributor:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Organization_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Research and Development
-
Contact_Position: Research Data Archivist
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing and physical
-
Address: 240 West Prospect Road
-
City: Fort Collins
-
State_or_Province: CO
-
Postal_Code: 80526
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: see Contact Instructions
-
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as of March 2020. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
-
Resource_Description: RDS-2020-0015
-
Distribution_Liability:
- Metadata documents have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Unless otherwise stated, all data and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. However, neither the author, the Archive, nor any part of the federal government can assure the reliability or suitability of these data for a particular purpose. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed for a user's application of these data or related materials.
The metadata, data, or related materials may be updated without notification. If a user believes errors are present in the metadata, data or related materials, please use the information in (1) Identification Information: Point of Contact, (2) Metadata Reference: Metadata Contact, or (3) Distribution Information: Distributor to notify the author or the Archive of the issues.
-
Standard_Order_Process:
-
-
Digital_Form:
-
-
Digital_Transfer_Information:
-
-
Format_Name: ASCII
-
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
-
Format_Specification:
- Comma-delimited ASCII text file (CSV)
-
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 19.00
-
Digital_Transfer_Option:
-
-
Online_Option:
-
-
Computer_Contact_Information:
-
-
Network_Address:
-
-
Network_Resource_Name:
https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0015
-
Digital_Form:
-
-
Digital_Transfer_Information:
-
-
Format_Name: PDF
-
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
-
Format_Specification:
- Portable Document Format file (PDF)
-
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 19.00
-
Digital_Transfer_Option:
-
-
Online_Option:
-
-
Computer_Contact_Information:
-
-
Network_Address:
-
-
Network_Resource_Name:
https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0015
-
Fees: None
Back to Top
-
Metadata_Reference_Information:
-
-
Metadata_Date: 20200306
-
Metadata_Contact:
-
-
Contact_Information:
-
-
Contact_Person_Primary:
-
-
Contact_Person: Frederica Wood
-
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
-
Contact_Position: Fernow Experimental Forest Data Manager
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: mailing
-
Address: Timber & Watershed Laboratory
-
Address: PO Box 404
-
City: Parsons
-
State_or_Province: WV
-
Postal_Code: 26287
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Address:
-
-
Address_Type: physical
-
Address: Timber & Watershed Laboratory
-
Address: 459 Nursery Bottom Road
-
City: Parsons
-
State_or_Province: WV
-
Postal_Code: 26287
-
Country: USA
-
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 304-478-2000 x128
-
Contact_Electronic_Mail_Address:
frederica.wood@usda.gov
-
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
-
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999
Back to Top