Thinning the 1927 “Graveyard” red pine stands in the Cutfoot Experimental Forest

Metadata:

Identification_Information:
Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Kastendick, Douglas N.
Originator: Palik, Brian J.
Publication_Date: 2020
Title:
Thinning the 1927 “Graveyard” red pine stands in the Cutfoot Experimental Forest
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0024
Description:
Abstract:
We provide historical silvicultural data from the “Graveyard” plots located on the Cutfoot Experimental Forest which is in north-central Minnesota within the Chippewa National Forest (known as the Minnesota National Forest at the time of plot establishment). The data included in this publication document the results of thinning red pine. Four plots were established in 1927 with different spacing and were reassessed in 1932, 1937, 1944, 1949, and 1953. Plots included 6x6, 8x8, and 10x10 foot spacing as well as a control plot. Data are provided in three comma-delimited ASCII text files which contain 1) diameter at breast height (DBH), crown class, and height measurements of mainly red (Norway) pine on four different plots (plots 22-25) between 1927 and 1953; 2) DBH and height measurements of all 4 plots in 1973; and 3) abundance of vegetation within the plots in 1932.
Purpose:
The purpose of these data was to study the effects of various degrees of non-commercial thinning on the future growth and yield of red (Norway) pine stands.
Supplemental_Information:
These data were originally published on 04/01/2020. Minor metadata updates were made on 07/21/2022.
Time_Period_of_Content:
Time_Period_Information:
Multiple_Dates/Times:
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1927
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1932
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1933
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1937
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1944
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1949
Single_Date/Time:
Calendar_Date: 1953
Currentness_Reference:
Observed
Status:
Progress: Complete
Maintenance_and_Update_Frequency: None planned
Spatial_Domain:
Description_of_Geographic_Extent:
These data were recorded in “Graveyard” plots 22-25 located on the Cutfoot Experimental Forest (Cutfoot EF). The plots are 0.6 miles west of Eagle Nest Lodge. The Cutfoot EF is located in north-central Minnesota within the Chippewa National Forest, formerly the Minnesota National Forest.
Bounding_Coordinates:
West_Bounding_Coordinate: -94.55000
East_Bounding_Coordinate: -94.49100
North_Bounding_Coordinate: 47.35700
South_Bounding_Coordinate: 47.30000
Keywords:
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: ISO 19115 Topic Category
Theme_Keyword: biota
Theme_Keyword: economy
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: National Research & Development Taxonomy
Theme_Keyword: Ecology, Ecosystems, & Environment
Theme_Keyword: Plant ecology
Theme_Keyword: Forest Products
Theme_Keyword: Inventory, Monitoring, & Analysis
Theme_Keyword: Monitoring
Theme_Keyword: Resource inventory
Theme_Keyword: Natural Resource Management & Use
Theme_Keyword: Economics
Theme_Keyword: Forest management
Theme_Keyword: Timber
Theme:
Theme_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Theme_Keyword: red pine
Theme_Keyword: Norway pine
Theme_Keyword: Pinus resinosa
Theme_Keyword: forest thinning
Theme_Keyword: timber growth
Place:
Place_Keyword_Thesaurus: None
Place_Keyword: Cutfoot Experimental Forest
Place_Keyword: Minnesota
Place_Keyword: Graveyard plots
Place_Keyword: Chippewa National Forest
Place_Keyword: Minnesota National Forest
Taxonomy:
Keywords/Taxon:
Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus:
None
Taxonomic_Keywords: plants
Taxonomic_Keywords: vegetation
Taxonomic_Keywords: single species
Taxonomic_Keywords: multiple species
Taxonomic_System:
Classification_System/Authority:
Classification_System_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: ITIS
Publication_Date: 2019
Title:
Integrated Taxonomic Information System
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: database
Other_Citation_Details:
Retrieved [May 8, 2019]
Online_Linkage: https://www.itis.gov
Classification_System_Modifications:
Taxonomy is provided here for the main species of interest. See \Supplements\Species_Taxonomy.html for taxonomy for all other species measured.

ITIS.gov does not contain the species value “Vaccinium pennsylvanicum”; however, it is a synonym to the currently accepted value “Vaccinium angustifolium”. Therefore, the new taxonomy was used.

ITIS.gov contains the species value “Aster macrophyllus” but it is no longer accepted and is only a synonym to the currently accepted value “Eurybia macrophylla”. Therefore, the new taxonomy was used.
Taxonomic_Procedures:
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Plantae
Applicable_Common_Name: plantes
Applicable_Common_Name: Planta
Applicable_Common_Name: Vegetal
Applicable_Common_Name: plants
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: SubKingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Viridiplantae
Applicable_Common_Name: green plants
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Infrakingdom
Taxon_Rank_Value: Streptophyta
Applicable_Common_Name: land plants
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superdivision
Taxon_Rank_Value: Embryophyta
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Division
Taxon_Rank_Value: Tracheophyta
Applicable_Common_Name: vascular plants
Applicable_Common_Name: tracheophytes
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subdivision
Taxon_Rank_Value: Spermatophytina
Applicable_Common_Name: spermatophytes
Applicable_Common_Name: seed plants
Applicable_Common_Name: phanerogames
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinopsida
Applicable_Common_Name: conifers
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinidae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinales
Applicable_Common_Name: pines
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinaceae
Applicable_Common_Name: pines
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinus
Applicable_Common_Name: pine
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinus resinosa
Applicable_Common_Name: red pine
Applicable_Common_Name: Norway pine
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinus banksiana
Applicable_Common_Name: scrub pine
Applicable_Common_Name: black pine
Applicable_Common_Name: gray pine
Applicable_Common_Name: Hudon Bay pine
Applicable_Common_Name: jack pine
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Pinus strobus
Applicable_Common_Name: eastern white pine
Applicable_Common_Name: white pine
Applicable_Common_Name: northern white pine
Applicable_Common_Name: soft pine
Applicable_Common_Name: Weymouth pine
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Picea
Applicable_Common_Name: spruce
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnoliopsida
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
Taxon_Rank_Value: Rosanae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Malpighiales
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Salicaceae
Applicable_Common_Name: willows
Applicable_Common_Name: saules
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Populus
Applicable_Common_Name: cottonwood
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Populus tremuloides
Applicable_Common_Name: quaking aspen
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fagales
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Betulaceae
Applicable_Common_Name: alder
Applicable_Common_Name: birch
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Betula
Applicable_Common_Name: birch
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Betula papyrifera
Applicable_Common_Name: paper birch
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Fagaceae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus
Applicable_Common_Name: chene
Applicable_Common_Name: oak
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus rubra
Applicable_Common_Name: northern red oak
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Quercus coccinea
Applicable_Common_Name: scarlet oak
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Superorder
Taxon_Rank_Value: Asteranae
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Asterales
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Asteraceae
Applicable_Common_Name: sunflowers
Applicable_Common_Name: tournesols
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Eurybia
Applicable_Common_Name: aster
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Eurybia macrophylia
Applicable_Common_Name: bigleaf aster
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ericales
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
Taxon_Rank_Value: Ericaceae
Applicable_Common_Name: heaths
Applicable_Common_Name: ericacees
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vaccinium
Applicable_Common_Name: blueberries
Applicable_Common_Name: huckleberry
Applicable_Common_Name: blueberry
Taxonomic_Classification:
Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
Taxon_Rank_Value: Vaccinium angustifolium
Applicable_Common_Name: lowbrush blueberry
Applicable_Common_Name: sweet lowbrush blueberry
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
These data were collected using funding from the U.S. Government and can be used without additional permissions or fees. If you use these data in a publication, presentation, or other research product please use the following citation:

Kastendick, Douglas N.; Palik, Brian J. 2020. Thinning the 1927 “Graveyard” red pine stands in the Cutfoot Experimental Forest. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0024
Point_of_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Douglas Kastendick
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
Contact_Position: Ecologist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 1831 Highway 169 East
City: Grand Rapids
State_or_Province: MN
Postal_Code: 55744
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 218-326-7131
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 218-326-7123
Data_Set_Credit:
The Forest Service Research Data Archive provided the funding to prepare and publish these data. Documents and data were scanned, digitized, and edited by Albert Beck of the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the Forest Service Research Data Archive.

Orignal data were measured and tallied by many USFS and local personnel over the years of the project. These personnel include: James L. Averell, Leo Zon, Paul J. Zehngraff, Victor Freeman, Herman F. Arle, R. Snyder, Frances H. Eyre, William A. Kluender, Ralph A. Ralston, Lee South, Lyle South, Jalmer J. Jokela, Zigmund A. Zasada, Suren R. Gevorkiantz, and MLH. Both the USDA Forest Service and USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station are listed as funding entities for this project.
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Schantz-Hansen, T.
Publication_Date: 1928
Title:
The effect of overstocking on a fifteen-year-old stand of Norway pine
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Journal of Forestry
Issue_Identification: 26: 544-545
Cross_Reference:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Kastendick, Douglas N.
Originator: Palik, Brian J.
Publication_Date: 202002
Title:
Thinning the 1927 “Common Sense” young Norway-jack pine stands in the Cutfoot Experimental Forest
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
Publication_Information:
Publication_Place: Fort Collins, CO
Publisher: Forest Service Research Data Archive
Online_Linkage: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0023
Back to Top
Data_Quality_Information:
Attribute_Accuracy:
Attribute_Accuracy_Report:
These data are assumed to be accurate, but there are no accuracy assessments or documents provided by the people who collected and recorded the data. These data are provided based on information gathered from historical records, so minimal information was available.
Logical_Consistency_Report:
On the original paper datasheets, a tree was only recorded as DEAD in the first year it was assessed as dead, afterward all measurements were blank. In order to not mix up 'no data' due to a dead tree with 'no data' due to other circumstances (such as a missing tag or data were not recorded), a tree was recorded as DEAD for every year after the first recording of it being dead in the digital files.

On the original data sheets, some 1953 DBH attributes had 'cut' after the measurement, meaning the tree was cut sometime after being measured. After consultation with the current Cutfoot researchers, these trees would have been cut later in 1953 or pre-growing season in 1954. Therefore we added a 1954 column with the same measurements as 1953 except for those trees marked to be cut, which now read 'CUT'.

Due to a timber sale in 1953, trees in plots 22, 23, and 25 were measured that year in late June and early July during the active growing season while plot 24 was measured in November. Plots 22, 23, and 25 should be used with caution when studying growth between 1949 and 1953.

Crown class classifications used in 1949 are different than those used in all other years due to the development of a newer classification system to help guide intermediate cuttings.

Data from 1973 do not include tag numbers for the trees measured for DBH or height, therefore they cannot be directly compared to earlier years.

The ‘remarks’ field was taken verbatim from the original datasheets and did not often contain much in the way of descriptors. These remarks are often not consistent especially when commenting on a dead tree. The user may want to fill these in or ignore them as needed.

"Birch" was listed in the Graveyard_Plots.csv and "PB" was originally listed in the Graveyard_Plots_1973.csv. These were changed to "Paper Birch".
Completeness_Report:
For the graveyard plot data, not all measurements were provided every year. Any blank data means no data were provided on the original forms.

Crown class was not provided for plots 22, 23, and 25 in the years 1927, 1944, and 1953. It was also not provided for plot 24 (control plot) in the years 1944 and 1953.

Although the month was included, the day of measurements in 1953 for plots 23 and 25 was not recorded. The names of the people who measured and tallied the data in 1953 for plots 23-25 are also missing from the datasheets.
Lineage:
Methodology:
Methodology_Type: Field
Methodology_Description:
The study was started in 1927 as a follow-up to a study started in 1923 and ended in 1926 after the plot vegetation was destroyed in a crown fire. In that study red pine was thinned to a spacing of 5x5 feet.

In 1927, four plots were laid out, at least one-tenth acre or larger. Plot 24 was used as the control and not thinned. Plot 22 was thinned to obtain a spacing of approximately 6x6 feet; plot 23 was thinned to a spacing of 8x8 feet; and plot 25 was thinned to a spacing of 10x10 feet.

Plot 22 (0.1326 acres) had 6x6 foot spacing and was established in the thickest portion of the young stand (about 5,850 trees per acre). The heights and diameters for this plot averaged less than for any of the other plots which was thought to indicate stagnation. Strips of white cloth were tied around the stems to be retained at about 1 foot above the ground. Then all the others were cut and burned off the plot. Most of the few hardwoods on the plot were retained where it seemed that they were not interfering with pines and their leaf fall might have been beneficial to the soil. Most of them were suppressed or intermediate in the original crown canopy. The retained pines were tagged with metal tags and their diameters and heights recorded.

The same method was employed with plot 23 (0.10 acres; 8x8 foot spacing) and plot 25 (0.211 acres; 10x10 foot spacing).

On plot 24 (0.10 acres; control), all the trees were tagged and their diameters measured. Sufficient heights were taken to form a well defined curve. Heights were taken with a long pole marked off in feet. Volume table measurements were taken on the trees found to be over the 3 inch DBH class, which was as high as C.G. Bates’ volume table went (Bates established the only experimental thinnings in very young Norway pine in 1923, see \Supplements\Preliminary_Report_and_Plan_for_1923_Study.pdf). These were worked up and added to his table so that the volume removed from the plots in the young stand could be computed.

The trees left on the plots were as near the determined distance for spacing as possible. However, retaining trees of good form and size was favored over exact spacing. After the final stand was marked, the trees were counted to see how near to correct the spacing was. On a per acre basis, the 6x6 spacing left 1,210 trees, the 8x8 spacing left 680 trees, and the 10x10 spacing 435 trees.

Trees were supposed to be measured every 5 years until the end of the study. Measurements were taken in 1927, 1932, 1937, 1944, 1949, and 1953. The “Graveyard” plots were retired in 1953.

In 1932, a vegetation abundance list was created for each plot, measuring all vegetation within the plot as ‘sparse’, ‘intermediate’, or ‘abundant’.

DBH measurements were taken again for all plots in 1973. Tags were not recorded so it is unknown which measurements correspond to which trees. Five height measurements were taken in each plot as well. It is unknown which trees were measured.
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Lake States Forest Experiment Station
Publication_Date: Unpublished material
Title:
Thinning in young Norway-jack pine stands working plan
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: document
Other_Citation_Details:
Unpublished report created October 14, 1927 (included in data publication: \Supplements\Working_Plan_Thinning_in_Young_Norway-Jack_Pine_Stands.pdf)
Methodology_Citation:
Citation_Information:
Originator: Kittredge, J. Jr.
Publication_Date: 1927
Title:
Thinning young red pine
Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: journal article
Series_Information:
Series_Name: Journal of Forestry
Issue_Identification: 25: 555-559
Process_Step:
Process_Description:
Data sheets and documents were provided to the Forest Service Research Data Archve by the Cutfoot Experimental Forest. All original paper documents were scanned into PDF files and the data were digitized into comma-delimited ASCII text (CSV) files.
Process_Date: 201904
Back to Top
Entity_and_Attribute_Information:
Overview_Description:
Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
Below is a description of the data and supplemental files included in this data publication.

DATA FILES (3)

1. \Data\Graveyard_Plots.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing red pine tree measurements collected on plots 22, 23, 24, and 25 at the Cutfoot Experimental Forest in 1927, 1932, 1937, 1944, 1947, and 1953.

On the original paper datasheets, a tree was only recorded as DEAD in the first year it was assessed as dead, afterward all measurements were blank. In order to not mix up ‘no data’ due to a dead tree with ‘no data’ due to other circumstances (such as a missing tag or data were not recorded), a tree was recorded as DEAD for every year after the first recording of it being dead in the digital file.

If a DBH attribute has ‘cut’ after the measurement, this means the tree was cut after being measured. No dates were given for when the trees were cut.

The specific dates of measurement and the names of the foresters involved can be located on the digitized paper datasheets within the supplemental files included as part of this data publication.

Attributes:

PLOT = Study plot designation number

TRT = Tree spacing treatment on the plot [measured in feet]

DIMENSION = Size of the plot [measured in feet]

TREE = Tagged number for each tree

SPECIES = Tree species measured
Aspen
Birch (Paper Birch)
Jack Pine
Norway Pine
Oak
Red Oak
Red Pine
Scarlet Oak
Spruce
White Pine
Missing = The tree or tag was missing

DBH27 = Diameter at breast height measured in 1927 [inches]

DBH32 = Diameter at breast height measured in 1932 [inches]

DBH37 = Diameter at breast height measured in 1937 [inches]

DBH44 = Diameter at breast height measured in 1944 [inches]

DBH49 = Diameter at breast height measured in 1949 [inches]

DBH53 = Diameter at breast height measured in 1953 [inches]

CC27 = Crown class in 1927
C = Codominant
D = Dominant
I = Intermediate
S = Suppressed

CC32 = Crown class in 1932
C = Codominant
D = Dominant
I = Intermediate
S = Suppressed

CC37 = Crown class in 1937
C = Codominant
D = Dominant
I = Intermediate
S = Suppressed

CC49 = Crown class in 1949
1a = Head dominants, good crown
2a = Strong dominants, good crown
2b = Strong dominants, medium crown
3a = Conditional dominants and codominants, good crown
3b = Conditional dominants and codominants, medium crown
4a = Weak dominants and codominants, good crown
4b = Weak dominants and codominants, medium crown
5a = Intermediates, good crown
5b = Intermediates, medium crown
5c = Intermediates, poor crown
6a = Suppressed, good crown
6b = Suppressed, medium crown
6c = Suppressed, poor crown
S = Suppressed

HT27 = Height recorded in 1927 [feet]

HT32 = Height recorded in 1932 [feet]

HT37 = Height recorded in 1937 [feet]

HT44 = Height recorded in 1944 [feet]

HT49 = Height recorded in 1949 [feet]

HT53 = Height recorded in 1953 [feet]

REMARKS = Extra information written about the tree or data


2. \Data\Graveyard_Plots_1973.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing red pine measurements collected on plots 22-25 at the Cutfoot Experimental Forest in 1973.

Attributes:

Date = Date of measurement [mm/dd/yyyy]

Location = Name of study plots

Plot = Number of the plot measured

Spacing = Amount of thinning completed on the plot [measured in feet]

Crew = People who conducted the measurements

Species = Tree species measured
Black Spruce
Paper Birch
Red Pine
White Pine

DBH = Diameter at breast height [inches]

Height = Tree height [feet]


3. \Data\Graveyard_VegAbundance.csv: Comma-delimited ASCII text file containing the abundance of vegetation collected on plots 22-25 at the Cutfoot Experimental Forest in 1932.

Attributes:

Species = Plant species measured

Plot 22 = Plot thinned to 6x6 feet spacing
S = Sparse
I = Intermediate
A = Abundant

Plot 23 = Plot thinned to 8x8 feet spacing
S = Sparse
I = Intermediate
A = Abundant

Plot 24 = Control plot
S = Sparse
I = Intermediate
A = Abundant

Plot 25 = Plot thinned to 10x10 feet spacing
S = Sparse
I = Intermediate
A = Abundant



SUPPLEMENTAL FILES (9)

1. \Supplements\Data_Sheets_1973_Graveyard_Plots_22-25.pdf: Portable document format (PDF) file containing a scan of the original data sheets containing red pine tree measurements collected in 1973.

2. \Supplements\Data_Sheets_Graveyard_Plot_22.pdf: Portable document format (PDF) file containing a scan of the original data sheets containing red pine tree measurements collected on Plot 22 in 1927, 1932, 1937, 1944, and 1953.

3. \Supplements\Data_Sheets_Graveyard_Plot_23.pdf: Portable document format (PDF) file containing a scan of the original data sheets containing red pine tree measurements collected on Plot 23 in 1927, 1932, 1937, 1944, and 1953.

4. \Supplements\Data_Sheets_Graveyard_Plot_24.pdf: Portable document format (PDF) file containing a scan of the original data sheets containing red pine tree measurements collected on Plot 24 in 1927, 1932, 1937, 1944, and 1953.

5. \Supplements\Data_Sheets_Graveyard_Plot_25.pdf: Portable document format (PDF) file containing a scan of the original data sheets containing red pine tree measurements collected on Plot 25 in 1927, 1932, 1937, 1944, and 1953.

6. \Supplements\Preliminary_Report_and_Plan_for_1923_Study: Portable document format (PDF) file containing a scan of an unpublished 1923 report detailing the working plan for the prior thinning study established by C.G. Bates.

7. \Supplements\Species_Taxonomy.html: HTML file containing the full taxonomy for all species measured in these data files.

8. \Supplements\Vegetation_List_Plots 22-25_1932.pdf: Portable document format (PDF) file containing a scan of the original data sheets containing vegetation abundance in all plots collected in 1932.

9. \Supplements\Working_Plan_Thinning_in_Young_Norway-Jack_Pine_Stands_1927.pdf: Portable document format (PDF) file containing a scan of an unpublished 1927 report detailing the working plan for the red pine thinning study.
Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
None provided
Back to Top
Distribution_Information:
Distributor:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Organization_Primary:
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Research and Development
Contact_Position: Research Data Archivist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 240 West Prospect Road
City: Fort Collins
State_or_Province: CO
Postal_Code: 80526
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: see Contact Instructions
Contact Instructions: This contact information was current as of July 2022. For current information see Contact Us page on: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS.
Resource_Description: RDS-2020-0024
Distribution_Liability:
Metadata documents have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness. Unless otherwise stated, all data and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. However, neither the author, the Archive, nor any part of the federal government can assure the reliability or suitability of these data for a particular purpose. The act of distribution shall not constitute any such warranty, and no responsibility is assumed for a user's application of these data or related materials.

The metadata, data, or related materials may be updated without notification. If a user believes errors are present in the metadata, data or related materials, please use the information in (1) Identification Information: Point of Contact, (2) Metadata Reference: Metadata Contact, or (3) Distribution Information: Distributor to notify the author or the Archive of the issues.
Standard_Order_Process:
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: ASCII
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
Format_Specification:
Comma-delimited ASCII text file (CSV)
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 19.00
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0024
Digital_Form:
Digital_Transfer_Information:
Format_Name: PDF
Format_Version_Number: see Format Specification
Format_Specification:
Portable Document Format file (PDF)
File_Decompression_Technique: Files zipped with 7-Zip 19.00
Digital_Transfer_Option:
Online_Option:
Computer_Contact_Information:
Network_Address:
Network_Resource_Name: https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2020-0024
Fees: None
Back to Top
Metadata_Reference_Information:
Metadata_Date: 20220721
Metadata_Contact:
Contact_Information:
Contact_Person_Primary:
Contact_Person: Douglas Kastendick
Contact_Organization: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station
Contact_Position: Ecologist
Contact_Address:
Address_Type: mailing and physical
Address: 1831 Highway 169 East
City: Grand Rapids
State_or_Province: MN
Postal_Code: 55744
Country: USA
Contact_Voice_Telephone: 218-326-7131
Contact_Facsimile_Telephone: 218-326-7123
Metadata_Standard_Name: FGDC Biological Data Profile of the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata
Metadata_Standard_Version: FGDC-STD-001.1-1999
Back to Top