Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Calibration of remotely sensed proportion or area estimates for misclassification error

Formally Refereed
Authors: Raymond L. Ph.D..Czaplewski, Glenn P. Catts
Year: 1992
Type: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Rocky Mountain Research Station
Source: Remote Sensing of Environment. 39(1): 29-43

Abstract

Classifications of remotely sensed data contain misclassification errors that bias areal estimates. Monte Carlo techniques were used to compare two statistical methods that correct or calibrate remotely sensed areal estimates for misclassification bias using reference data from an error matrix. The inverse calibration estimator was consistently superior to the classical estimator using a simple random sample of reference plots. The effects of sample size of reference plots, detail of the classification system, and classification accuracy on the precision of the inverse estimator are discussed. If reference plots are a simple random sample of the study area, then a total sample size of 500-1000 independent reference plots is recommended for calibration.

Keywords

remote sensing, calibration, misclassification error

Citation

Czaplewski, Raymond L.; Catts, Glenn P. 1992. Calibration of remotely sensed proportion or area estimates for misclassification error. Remote Sensing of Environment. 39(1): 29-43.
https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/treesearch/31721