![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
November 2005 | ![]() |
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
0551 1303P-SDTDC |
||
![]() |
Susan M. Zahn—Fuels Management Specialist |
|
All emissions evaluations and supporting data was provided by Ron Babbitt and the staff from U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT
|
---|
SUMMARY BACKGROUND Because vegetation reduction for wildfire mitigation and forest health is critical to fire and fuels management, researching alternative methods has become a top priority. Prescribed fire and pile burning have been the traditional methods of removing unwanted fuel and vegetation for many years. But weather conditions, air quality rules and regulations, and safety concerns (especially adjacent to wildland-urban-interface areas) have restricted the use of these methods. Although leaving vegetation onsite to decompose naturally is sometimes an alternative, decomposition can take many years and vegetation onsite does not alleviate fire risk. Decomposition can also increase the risk of outbreaks of unwanted insects. Chipping, grinding, and mulching are other alternatives, but their necessary removal and disposal may prove costly. ACDs have been used throughout the world for several applications: • In forest fuel management and wildfire mitigation efforts. • In the construction industry (to reduce debris from land clearing and demolition operations). • At landfill sites (to maximize costly space by reducing wood waste and similar burnable waste). • In disaster recovery (for clearing debris from storms or floods). ACDs can operate safely and year round for vegetation disposal with few operating limitations. These limitations include fire conditions, required clearance from trees (or other fuel hazards), maximum allowable wind conditions, and the proper use of heavy equipment (figure 1). | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 1—ACD in full operation (no visible smoke).
DESCRIPTION
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Figure 2—Air burner.
EQUIPMENT
Figure 3—Skid-mounted ACD.
As figure 3 shows, the skid-mounted ACD is a self-contained system with a refractory-walled firebox, diesel engine powerplant, mechanical drive system, blower fan, and fuel tank. Both manufacturers engineered ACDs for transport by a lowboy or similar drop-deck trailer. This ease of transport increases flexibility, because operators can bring the ACD to the project site and avoid transporting vegetation elsewhere for processing. These ACDs are ready for use on arrival with minimal setup time. The refractory-lined firebox allows contained burning. The unit supports the diesel engine, fuel tank, and direct-drive system to operate the fan. An air-nozzle manifold is mounted on the backside of the firebox. The vegetation is loaded over the top of the ACD on the side opposite the manifold. Both manufacturers created vertical refractory walls to aid combustion by retaining and reflecting the high temperatures that the firebox generates. The manufacturers state that the combustion process reduces the wood waste by about 98 percent, leaving only 2 percent in volume as residual ash. Twin refractory-lined panel doors at the rear of the firebox allow for ash removal. Both units are designed without bottom panels and sit directly above ground. Because of the skids and durability of the Air Burners LLC unit, users can reposition it onsite or transport it from site to site, depending upon the terrain and distance. During transport the rear door panels can open for dumping ash. Users can empty the McPherson of ash by using a loader with a bucket. After the unit has cooled, the panels are disassembled. With both units, ash may be left in place, disposed of, or mixed with soil onsite or elsewhere. OPERATION
Figure 4— Approximately 5 tones of vegetation combusting.
During full operation, operators use mechanized equipment to feed vegetation into the burner at a steady rate. The best results were obtained by using an excavator with a grappler arm. An excavator with a bucket and thumb worked best for cleaning ash from the burner. The last stage, known as burndown, typically takes about 2 to 3 hours, depending on the type and size of the vegetation. The unit is allowed to burn with no interruption to the air curtain. See figure 5. Once the materials inside burn down to under one half the height of the burner, operators slowly decrease the amount of air. After burndown, hot coals may remain for several days under an insulating blanket of ash. In the right conditions, operators may leave the ash in place to reignite new vegetation added the next day. Use caution when watering to cool the embers, cooler water may inadvertently splash water on the hot panels, possibly causing them to crack. ACDs are designed to run for about 24 hours before ash removal, but running time depends on the vegetation’s type and size. Long burns generally are more efficient (having lower emissions) than shorter burns. Efficiency starts to drop once the ash pile reaches about one-quarter to one-third of the firebox depth. For safe operation, have at least a 100-foot cleared space around the ACD. Barring extremely high winds, large embers are unlikely to escape the firebox and burn beyond the cleared area. Although small embers commonly are released from the burner during operation, they generally completely burn out before they hit the ground. Safety should always be the number one consideration. Personnel must use all protective equipment, including personal protective clothing, and ensure that all mechanized equipment is clean and running efficiently. Operators should have a water source or fire engine and crew onsite to reduce the risk of possible fire spread. No one should operate an ACD if the fire danger is too high or if people or animals are likely to have unsupervised access around the burner site. Should conditions require shutdown, operators can extinguish the fire by using onsite soil to smother the combustion process in the unit. SDTDC EVALUATION The vegetation used during the evaluation was a combination of Jeffery Pine and Douglas Fir. Each evaluation surveyed combustion rates, ember release (from the units), and emissions. Evaluation results for both units were very positive. Combustion rates were within range of the manufacturers’ parameters. Emission evaluation results were favorable for both units. Table 1 shows the emissions of both units compared to broadcast and pile burning.
Figure 5— Photo shows results when the airflow is broken; a log smolders above the air curtain.
Table 1— Average emission factors for different management tools (pounds per ton).
Explanation of Data
CONCLUSIONS ACDs: • Produce lower smoke emissions compared to pile or broadcast burning. • Burn a greater variety, amount, and size of materials from dead to green vegetation. • Reduce fire risk and outbreak of insect problems. • Operate with fewer restrictions in weather and burn conditions. • Contain burn area to a specific site.
INFORMATION
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABOUT THE AUTHOR... Susan Zahn has almost 20 years of employment with the USDA Forest Service on each of the southern California forests. Sue has worked in areas of fire suppression, prevention, fire rehabilitation, fuels, wilderness and trails management, and as a volunteer coordinator. Sue started working at SDTDC in 2002 as the fuels management specialist. Sue has been assigned to a Wildland Interagency Incident Management Team for 10 years. She also serves on many regional and interregional training cadres. She is a graduate of the University of La Verne, with a bachelor of science degree in public administration.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
For Additional Information Contact: Information contained in this document has been developed for the guidance of employees of the Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), its contractors, and cooperating Federal and State agencies. The USDA assumes no responsibility for the interpretation or use of this information by other than its own employees. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names is for the information and convenience of the reader. Such use does not constitute an official evaluation, conclusion, recommendation, endorsement, or approval of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. |