Improving Firefighter Safety in the Wildland-Urban Intermix
Richard J. Mangan
Program Leader
USDA Forest Service
Technology and Development Program
Missoula, Montana
TE02P16-Tech Services-Fire Aviation Management
5100 Fire
February 2000
0051-2811-MTDC
Table of Contents
Introduction
Each year, the incursion of private
residences in wildland increases
the chance that wildland and
structural firefighters will battle an
uncontrolled fire in the "wildland-urban
intermix," where homes and naturally
occurring vegetation are the fuels at risk.
Although much of the general population
believes that wildland-urban intermix
fires are unique to Southern California,
they exist across the United States, and
are threatening to destroy valuable
natural resources and structures at an
ever-increasing rate. The past several
years have seen these intermix fires
(Figure 1) occur from Florida to Alaska,
from Long Island to Montana, and from
Maine to Southern California. While the
natural fuel types of these fires may
differ based on geographic and climatic
conditions across the country, one factor
remains constant: the risks to firefighters
battling these fires. Since 1990,
numerous firefighters (both wildland and
structural) have been entrapped, burned,
and sometimes killed while suppressing
fires in the intermix.
With lands in the wildland-urban intermix
continuing to increase, it is time to
clearly define all the groups involved in
these areas, and to identify the factors
that must be addressed to ensure
firefighter safety when the inevitable
wildland-urban intermix fires do occur.

Figure 1-A firefighter removes hose while fighting a wildland-urban intermix fire in San Diego County (Los Angeles Times Syndicate Photo,
Don Barletti).
Back to Table of Contents
Defining the Players
Four distinct groups are key
players in the wildland-urban
intermix. Their relationship to
firefighter safety-before an ignition and
once a fire is burning-is critical. These
groups include the community, the
individual homeowners, the fire agency,
and the individual firefighters (Figure 2).

Figure 2-A variety of factors influence firefighter safety.
Back to Table of Contents
The Community
For this paper, the "community" is
defined as the level of government
(town, village, county, State) that is
responsible for the laws, regulations,
statutes, and ordinances that control
development, planning, and law
enforcement in areas defined as
intermix.
Perhaps the most important function the
community can play to ensure firefighter
safety is through planning. By requiring
developers and builders to adhere to
strict standards for building materials,
clearing limits, and fire-resistant plant
species for landscaping, the community
can help ensure that firefighters have a
reasonable chance to safely fight a fire
(Figure 3).

Figure 3-Planning is the first step to making a home site in the wildland-urban intermix safe from wildland fire.
Other important roles for the community
include enforcing existing ordinances for
vegetation, conducting fire prevention
inspections on a timely basis, and
enforcing the approved standards for
fire-safe building construction practices.
Access is a critical component of
suppressing any fire, and becomes even
more critical in wildland-urban intermix
fires. Road width, traffic flow, curve
radius, and bridge weight limits all impact
the timeliness and ability of fire
apparatus to reach a fire, or to gain
access to protect a structure. Careful
consideration of
design criteria to
match roads with
access and egress
needs of the civilian
population as well as
the needs of fire
equipment are
essential during the
early stages of an
area's development.
Once residences are
in place, the
community is
responsible for
developing fully
integrated
evacuation plans for the civilian
population should a fire occur, and for
coordinating the efforts of fire control and
law enforcement to ensure that both are
able to achieve their objectives in a
timely manner.
Back to Table of Contents
The Homeowner
Although many of the factors that help
ensure firefighter safety are
responsibilities of the community, the
homeowner who chooses to live in the
intermix has an important role. Before a
home is built, the choice of the
construction design and building
materials can significantly affect a
residence's fire safety, even when the
residence is constructed in accordance
with appropriate community guidelines
and ordinances. Once the structure is
constructed, maintaining the defensible
space, reducing naturally occurring
hazards, and preventing unwanted fires
are all responsibilities of the homeowner
(Figure 4).

Figure 4-Defensible space around a home helps ensure firefighter safety.
Even though these steps and the actions
of the community should greatly reduce
the risk of wildfire threat to homeowners
in the intermix, homeowners have one
additional responsibility: planning for
evacuation in times of extreme fire
behavior. Homeowners must maintain
accountability for all family members,
remove important papers and family
heirlooms, evacuate pets and livestock,
and know the best transportation routes
away from the fire. All these aspects of
evacuation must be planned by the
homeowner long before the threat of fire.
Failure to do so will delay evacuation,
and may threaten the safety of
firefighters trying to access the area to
suppress the fire, protect property, or
save the lives of entrapped residents.
Back to Table of Contents
The Fire Agency
The overall responsibility for ensuring
the safety of firefighters lies with the fire
agency having jurisdiction for the area.
Once a fire ignition occurs, it is too late
to take the steps that are essential to
ensure a safe and efficient fire
suppression operation. Each fire agency
must address several key areas as part
of its preplanning effort for fires in the
wildland-urban intermix.
First, the training and qualifications of
firefighters and fire officers must be
focused for the wildland fire suppression
job. These skills are often significantly
different than those required in the
structural fire arena. Failure to address
those differences can result in close
calls, injuries, and even fatalities
because threats are not recognized. Fire
agencies can address these
requirements by referring to both ICS
310-1 (Incident Command System
Wildland Fire Qualification Subsystem
Guide) and NFPA 1051 (National Fire
Protection Association Standard for
Wildland Fire Fighter Professional
Qualifications). Recognition of the effects
of the weather, terrain, and fuels on fire
behavior and the effectiveness of
suppression activities is especially
critical in the wildfire environment. Also,
chief officers in traditional structural fire
agencies often are not trained in wildland
operations to the
level that a
wildland
firefighting
division
supervisor might
be: assigning
individuals in
critical positions
who were not
qualified or
experienced in
wildfire has
resulted in
firefighter
burnovers and
entrapments
(Figure 5).

Figure 5-Wildland firefighting has specific requirements for training and equipment.
The equipment selected by the fire
agency for the wildfire component of
their fire protection responsibility is also
an important factor in firefighter safety.
Engines and other apparatus that cannot
maneuver on narrow, curving roads, or
that exceed the load limits on bridges
can put firefighters at risk in fast-moving
wildfires (Figure 6). Close coordination
by the fire agency with the community to
adapt the transportation system and new
equipment to meet the existing and
planned conditions is important in ensure
that firefighters can safely perform on an
intermix fire.

Figure 6-The size and weight of firefighting apparatus can present problems for
firefighters in the wildland-urban intermix.
Communications have always been
identified as a critical component in
firefighter safety. The 18 Situations That
Shout Watch Out, 10 Standard Fire
Orders, Downhill Line Construction
Guidelines and L.C.E.S. (Lookouts,
Communications, Escape Routes and
Safety Zones) all include
communications as a cornerstone. In the
wildland-urban intermix environment, the
capability of a communications system
to function across jurisdictional
boundaries is even more critical. These
fires nearly always involve numerous fire
agencies, often operating under a unified
command structure. Agencies must
provide their firefighters with
communications systems capable of
functioning in these environments.
Failure to do so threatens firefighters'
safety and limits their ability to perform
effectively. Communications failures or
overload have been identified as a
serious problem on both the Oakland
Hills Fire and the Spokane, Washington,
Fire Storm Fires in 1991, and as a
causal factor of the 1993 Glenallen Fire
fatalities in Los Angeles County.
Personal protective equipment affects
the firefighter in several ways in the
wildland-urban intermix. The necessary
level of protection from radiant heat must
be balanced against the risk of heat
stress from too many layers of
protective clothing. While most agencies
are feeling the pressure of reduced
budgets, it is essential that firefighters be
supplied with the proper protective
clothing and equipment. NFPA 1977
Standard on Protective Clothing and
Equipment for Wildland Fire Fighting,
(Figure 7) specifies the performance and
design requirements for wildland fire
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE).
Wildland fire PPE generally is not
interchangeable with the PPE needed for
structural fire suppression. High
temperatures, low humidity, and high
levels of physical activity are extremely
demanding on firefighters. Their
protective clothing and equipment should
not increase the heat stress. Australian
studies on "Project Aquarius" emphasize
that wildland PPE should be designed "to
let the heat out, not keep the heat out."

Figure 7-National Fire Protection Association Standard 1977 sets the requirements for
wildland fire personal protective equipment.
Fire shelters may be the most critical
piece of PPE for firefighter safety in the
wildland-urban intermix. Although the fire
shelter is intended as a tool of last
resort, it has saved the lives of hundreds
of firefighters in both the wildland and
wildland-urban intermix environments.
Fire agencies must provide all
firefighters who may be working in the
wildland-urban intermix with both the fire
shelter and the training needed to use it
as intended.
Physical fitness, the physical ability to
do the job at hand, is another key area
where fire agencies can have a positive
influence on firefighter safety (Figure 8).
Management support for individual
firefighter fitness will help reduce heat
stress injuries and heart attacks, while
increasing firefighters' ability to move
quickly along escape routes to safety
zones. Heart attacks were among the
leading causes of firefighter fatalities on
both wildfires and structural fires during
the 1990's.
Figure 8-Physical fitness is essential to
safe operations on all wildfires.
The last area where the fire agency has
a major role in firefighter safety is in
developing policies and standard
operating procedures (SOP's) specific to
the wildland-urban intermix fire
operations. Because these intermix fires
may not be a daily occurrence for some
fire agencies, it is essential that their
firefighters have clear direction when
these events do occur. Specific items
included in these policies and SOP's
must include chain of command,
communications practices and
frequencies (including interagency
coordination), suppression priorities, and
safety practices. A critical question that
must be addressed in training deals with
the best place to survive a burnover or
entrapment: in an engine cab or in a fire
shelter. Firefighters were forced to make
split-second decisions to deploy fire
shelters or remain with their engines
during several entrapments in Southern
California during 1993 and 1996. Those
choices should be well explained in
department policy, and reinforced
through training, long before firefighters
have to make such a decision.
Back to Table of Contents
The Firefighter
Although firefighters are the last of the
four groups discussed, they are the
most critical players in affecting their
own safety on wildland-urban intermix
fires. Shakespeare said: "To thine own
self be true." This is especially applicable
to the individual firefighter. Although
many of the actions of the community,
homeowner, and fire agency can help
ensure firefighters' safety, firefighters as
individuals, or as members of a team,
are ultimately responsible for their own
safety.
Fitness
Whether or not a fire agency
has fitness requirements or sponsors a
voluntary fitness program, firefighters
have the responsibility to ensure that
they are physically fit for the job. A
review of wildland fire fatalities from 1990
to 1998 shows that 28 fatalities, or 21%
of the total, were due to heart attacks
(Figure 9). Firefighters must be in good
condition to successfully function on
long, hot shifts exceeding 12 hours for
several days in a row, especially if they
then have to move quickly along an
escape route to reach a safety zone.
Failure to move quickly in such a
situation may endanger not only the
firefighter, but fellow firefighters as well.
Figure 9-Heart attacks are a leading cause of death for wildland firefighters.
Training
Firefighters involved in
structural and wildland fire suppression
must be trained in both areas of fire
suppression. If they lack that training, or
are uncomfortable with its adequacy,
individual firefighters must address that
concern with their supervisor. Failure to
understand the fundamentals of
topography, strategies, tactics, behavior,
or weather has been recognized as a
causal factor leading to several
burnovers that resulted in serious
injuries or death. Numerous avenues are
available for firefighters to increase their
knowledge of wildland fire. Failure to
learn about wildfires could cost
firefighters their lives.
The Human Factor
The best training
is wasted if the individual involved in a
wildland-urban intermix fire is unable to
apply that training and respond
appropriately. Situational awareness-
knowing what is happening around
you-is important for firefighters in the
intermix if they are to safely and
efficiently perform their job. A number of
guidelines ( 10 Standard Fire Orders, 18
Situations that Shout Watch Out, LCES,
etc.) can help, but they all require
firefighters to recognize and respond to
the situation in an approved manner to
ensure their own safety.
All firefighters, regardless of their
position in the fire organization, must do
all they can to foster communications
with other individuals above and below
them. The constant, open channel of
communications established in ordinary
circumstances will be especially
important when conditions develop that
are out of the ordinary, or that may
become life threatening. Firefighter
safety is enhanced when all members of
a fire crew can offer observations or
share concerns about developing
situations (Figure 10).

Figure 10-Maintaining constant communications is a cornerstone of fire safety.
Personal Protective Equipment
Wildfires expose the firefighter to a
series of hazards different from those
faced on structural fires. The PPE is
unique to each job, but neither structural
nor wildland PPE protects the firefighter
if it is used improperly or, worse yet, if it
is not used at all. Each firefighter has an
individual responsibility to use the
appropriate PPE on a wildland-urban
intermix fire. Failure to do so may result
in heat stress, burns, or death.
Back to Table of Contents
During the Fire
Up to this point, we have
discussed firefighter safety
before a wildland-urban
intermix incident occurs. Once such a
fire starts, a whole new group of factors
comes into play (Figure 11).

Figure 11-During a fire a number of interacting factors affect firefighter safety.
Back to Table of Contents
Access
Although access was discussed earlier
as a responsibility of both the community
and the fire agencies in the planning
phase for wildland-intermix fires, access
can quickly become a critical factor once
a fire occurs. If the civilian population is
attempting to leave an area on the same
narrow, curving roads that firefighters
are using to enter the area, the result
can be traffic jams, unsafe driving
practices, and, ultimately, gridlock for
both the civilian vehicles and the fire
apparatus. When this occurs during
active fire behavior, firefighters may
become trapped in dangerous locations,
as they were on the Calabasas Incident
in Los Angeles County during the 1996
fire season. On that incident, firefighters
trying to cross a midslope road were
prevented from leaving a "chimney" by a
civilian vehicle attempting to leave the
area. When the fire made a strong uphill
run through the chimney, the firefighters
were burned over. To mitigate the risks
posed by access problems during
wildland-urban intermix fires, close
coordination between the fire
commanders, dispatch
centers, and law
enforcement agencies
is essential. Traffic
control,
specialized
road signing,
and road
closures will help
ensure that fire
personnel can
safely enter a fire
area and can reduce
the hazards inherent
with two-way traffic in
an emergency
environment. Local
knowledge of the road
systems is also an
essential factor in avoiding
dangerous situations. Local
firefighters may need to be assigned with
firefighters from other areas to help them
move throughout the fire area.
Back to Table of Contents
Civilian Population
Despite all the public service
announcements about fire safety, onsite
inspections, and good intentions by
homeowners, it is likely that the majority
of the residents threatened by a
wildland-urban intermix fire will be
grossly unprepared for evacuation.
Some may be unwilling to leave their
property. Their chaotic exodus, or their
refusal to leave, may pose a serious risk
to firefighter safety. Fire agencies must
coordinate with the other local agencies
responsible for enforcing mandatory
evacuation orders in areas where there
is a high likelihood of fire activity.
Back to Table of Contents
Special Hazards
Firefighters entering the wildland-urban
intermix area for fire suppression
activities face a variety of hazards that
differ from the typical hazards in either
wildfires or structural fires. Although
intermix fires may appear to be simply
wildfires that threaten to burn
residences, such fires represent unique,
high-risk hazards that require special
attention to prevent injury or death.
Powerlines
Overhead powerlines, found throughout
wildland-urban intermix areas, pose
several threats to firefighters. The risk of
electrocution from downed lines is the
most obvious (Figure 12). Electrocution
caused the only death of a firefighter
during the 1991 Oakland Hills Fire. A
more insidious risk comes from electrical
current transferred through smoke, a
risk that may not be as obvious as a
downed wire, but can be just as deadly.

Figure 12-Power lines can be a safety hazard in the wildland-urban intermix.
Propane Tanks
Propane tanks and natural gas lines are
found in many areas of the intermix, and
can become an explosive hazard when
they are burned over, or when they are
damaged by equipment used in the
suppression effort. Natural gas lines
should be identified on preattack hazard
maps. Dispatch centers must alert
firefighters entering intermix areas to
such hazards. If natural gas lines are
believed to be in an intermix fire area, the
gas distributor should be requested to
shut down service to the area affected.
Propane storage tanks at residences
can't be mapped as easily, so firefighters
must be on the lookout for them,
especially in areas of heavy smoke.
Abandoned Vehicles
Vehicles abandoned during evacuation
may catch fire, posing a hazard from the
increased fire intensity when gas tanks
rupture or melt, and from the toxic
smoke they generate. While the risk of
explosion from a vehicle fire is minimal,
the hazards identified are such that
firefighters attempting to suppress a
vehicle fire must be properly trained and
equipped, and should have training in the
use of an SCBA (self-contained
breathing apparatus).
Hazardous Materials
Hazardous materials, such as farm
chemicals, are commonly found in many
intermix areas. When they burn,
hazardous materials are often highly
toxic. Fires in barns and storage sheds
should not be approached without
appropriate respiratory protection.
Explosives, such as dynamite or
gunpowder, are often found in intermix
areas. Any indication of explosives
should be viewed as an extreme risk,
and firefighters should not be nearby
unless they are specially trained and
equipped.
Back to Table of Contents
Mix of Forces
Nearly every wildland-urban
intermix fire results in
responses from a number of
fire agencies, both wildland and
structural. Unless properly coordinated,
the mix of forces that responds to a fire
can be a risk to firefighter safety. The
variety of equipment (Figure 13), differing
levels of training and experience, and the
integration of hand crews, mechanized
equipment, and air operations all offer
opportunities for a breakdown in safe
work practices. In that environment,
firefighters and fire officers must be
especially alert to the coordination
required in using this mix of forces, and
must follow their own agency's safe
practices and procedures despite
differences with the practices and
procedures used by cooperators.

Figure 13-Selecting proper equipment is a key to safe operations.
Back to Table of Contents
Command and Control
The command and control
structure on intermix fires is
often complicated. Factors that
can cause confusion and conflicts and
increase risks to firefighter safety
include: multiple jurisdictions, unified
command, structural versus wildfire
training and experience, lack of
coordination with law enforcement
agencies, and the sense of urgency that
finds multiple dissimilar resources
assigned to a common protection
objective. Close and timely coordination
of responsible agencies is essential as
soon as intermix fires occur. Although
much of the needed coordination can
take place during the off season, the
critical interchange of information and
agreements on operating procedures
must occur on the fire ground between
the designated fire officers from each
involved agency. Especially sensitive
areas include areas of responsibility,
communications links between
resources, coordination of air resources,
clear definition of boundaries such as
division breaks, and emergency medical
evacuation procedures.
Back to Table of Contents
Protective Clothing and Equipment
When all else fails, the "fall-
back position" for individual
firefighters is the proper use
of their personal protective clothing and
equipment. Fires in the intermix may
require that some firefighters are
dressed in wildland PPE while others
wear structural PPE. The rapidly
changing fire conditions often require
that firefighters switch from a wildfire
mode into structural protection, and then
back again. It is critical that firefighters
and fire officers have the "situational
awareness" that allows them to don the
appropriate PPE (Figure 14) for their
immediate situation. Failure do so can,
and has, caused firefighter injuries and
fatalities. All firefighters entering the
wildland-urban intermix zone must be
equipped and trained in the proper use of
the fire shelter. The shelter's use (or the
failure to use it) has been a factor in firefighter
survival on intermix fires from
California to Alaska over the past decade.

Figure 14-Protective clothing must be
appropriate for the fire, and must be used as
intended.
Failure to adequately plan and execute
the steps necessary to ensure firefighter
safety in the wildland-urban intermix has
resulted in close calls, injuries, and even
fatalities across the United States:
Back to Table of Contents
Conclusions
Fires in the wildland-urban intermix
(Figure 16) will occur more and
more frequently, in all areas of
the United States. Injuries and fatalities
to firefighters must be reduced or
eliminated on these fires in the years
ahead. Coordinated efforts between the
community, homeowners, fire agencies,
and firefighters before the fire occurs are
essential to ensure firefighter safety.
These measures must be reinforced by
safety-conscious performance by both
firefighters and fire officers once fires are
being fought in the wildland-urban
intermix.
Figure 16-The results of the 1991 East Bay Firestorm in Oakland, CA. Photos used with
permission of the Oakland Tribune. Before: Robert Warwick, After: Michael Macor.
Back to Table of Contents
References
Baden, Bill; Swinford, Robert; Erb, Roger; Bethea, John. 1990. Fire fighter safety in wildland/urban interface fires. PMS 417-1.
Boise, ID: National Wildfire Coordinating Group. 24 p.
Butler, Bret W.; Bartlette, Roberta A.; Bradshaw, Larry S.; Cohen, Jack D.; Andrews, Patricia L.; Putnam, Ted; Mangan, Richard J.
1998. Fire behavior associated with the 1994 South Canyon Fire on Storm King Mountain, Colorado. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-9.
Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 82 p.
Hawkins, John R. 1996. Save the structure, but don't get killed. Fire Chief. June: 43-50.
International Fire Code Institute. 1997. 1997 Urban-wildand interface code: first edition. Whittier, CA: International Fire Code
Institute. 49 p.
Mangan Richard. 1999. Wildland fire fatalities in the United States: 1990 to 1998. Tech. Rep. 9951-2808-MTDC. Missoula, MT: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center. 14 p.
National Fire Protection Association. 1995. NFPA 1051 standard for wildland fire fighter professional qualifications: 1995 edition.
Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association. 22 p.
National Fire Protection Association. 1998. NFPA 1977 standard on protective clothing and equipment for wildland fire fighting:
1998 edition. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association. 70 p.
National Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Protection Program. 1997. National Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Protection Program. 16 p.
North Idaho Fire Prevention Cooperatives. 1990. Wildfire and the suburban home: a formula for disaster! Bonners Ferry, ID: The
North Idaho Fire Prevention Cooperatives of Boundary, Bonner, Kootenai, Shoshone, and Benewah Counties. 23 p.
Plevel, Steve Randolph. 1996. Factors affecting local government adoption of wildland-urban interface fire policies. Tucson, AZ:
University of Arizona. 73 p. Thesis.
Sharkey, Brian. 1997. Fitness and work capacity, second edition. Tech. Rep. 9751-2814-MTDC. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center. 78 p.
Western Fire Chiefs Association. 1991. Development strategies in the wildland/urban interface. Billings, MT: International
Association of Fire Chiefs and Western Fire Chiefs Association. 213 p.
Back to Table of Contents
About the Author...
Dick Mangan has been Program Leader for Fire, Aviation, and Residues at MTDC since 1989. Before coming to the center, he
spent more than 20 years working on Ranger Districts and National Forests in Oregon and Washington, participating in the full
range of wildland fire activities. He serves on the National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) Fire Equipment and Safety and
Health Working Teams and is chairperson of the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1977 Technical Committee for
Wildland Fire Personal Protective Clothing and Equipment. Dick remains active in the field, representing MTDC on fire entrapment
investigations and serving as Operations Section Chief on a National Type 1 Overhead Team.
Additional single copies of this document may be ordered from:
USDA Forest Service
Missoula Technology and Development Center
Building 1, Fort Missoula
Missoula, MT 59804-7294
Phone: (406) 329-3978
Fax: (406) 329-3719
E-mail: pubs_wo_mtdc@fs.fed.us
For additional technical information, contact Dick Mangan at the address above.
Phone: (406) 329-3849
Fax: (406) 329-3719
This manuscript was presented at the symposium on Fire in California Ecosystems:
Integrating Ecology, Prevention, and Management, November 17-20, 1997, University
of California, Davis.
Disclaimer
The Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, has developed this information for the guidance of its employees, its contractors, and its cooperating
Federal and State agencies, and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone except its own employees. The use of trade, firm, or
corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader, and does not constitute an endorsement by the Department of any product
or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities
on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases
apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, and so forth)
should phone USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room
326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
This page last modified March 12, 2002
Visitor
since March 12, 2002