References
Brooks, Kenneth M. 2000. Assessment of the environmental effects associated with wooden bridges preserved with creosote, pentachlorophenol, or chromated copper arsenate. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-587. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/fplrp587.pdf
Falk, Bob; Williams, Sam. 1997. Details for a lasting deck. In: Porches, decks, & outbuildings: the best of fine homebuilding. Newtown, CT: Taunton Press: 62-65. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf1997/falk97d.pdf
Forest Products Society. 1995. Selection and use of preservative-treated wood. Madison, WI: Forest Products Society.
Goyette, D.; Brooks, K.M. 1998. Creosote evaluation: phase II. Sooke Basin Study—baseline to 535 days post construction, 1995-1996. Rep. PR98-04. North Vancouver, BC, Canada: Environment Canada 568 p.
Highley, T.L. 1995. Comparative durability of untreated wood in use above ground. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation: 409-419. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf1995/highl95a.pdf
Lebow, Stan T.; Winandy, Jerrold; Bender, Donald. 2004. Treated wood in transition: a look at CCA and the candidates to replace it. Wood Design Focus. 8 p. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/pdf2004/fpl_2004_lebow005.pdf
Lebow, Stan T.; Tippie, Michael. 2001. Guide for minimizing the effect of preservative-treated wood on sensitive environments. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-122. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Available at: http:// www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr122.pdf
Lebow, Stan T.; Halverson, Steven A.; Morrell, Jeffrey J.; Simonsen, John. 2000. Role of construction debris in release of copper, chromium, and arsenic from treated wood structures. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-584. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/fplrp584.pdf
Lebow, Stan T. 2000. Durability: what's in pressure treated wood? Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory Techline. 3 p. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/techline/whats-in-that-pressure-treated-wood.pdf
Lebow, Stan T. 1996. Leaching of wood preservative components and their mobility in the environment—summary of pertinent literature. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-93 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 36 p. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr93.pdf
Lebow, Stan T.; Makel, William J. 1995. Selection and use of preservative treated wood in Forest Service recreational structures. Tech. Rep. 9523-1203-SDTDC. San Dimas, CA: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, San Dimas Technology and Development Center. Available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/pdfimage/95231203.pdf
Mehta, P.K. 2001. Reducing the environmental impact of concrete. Concrete International. 3(10): 61-66.
Pilon, John, ed. 2002. Best management practices for the use of preservative-treated wood in aquatic environments in Michigan. John Pilon, ed. Roscommon, MI: Michigan Department of Natural Resources. 26 p. For copies, contact the National Wood in Transportation Center at: http://www.fs.fed.us/na/wit/ or call the Huron Pines Resource Conservation and Development Area Council at 989-348-9319.
Ritter, Michael A.; Duwadi, Sheila Rimal. 1998. Research accomplishments for wood transportation structures based on a national research needs assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL-GTR-105. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 30 p.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 2000. Environmental impact of preservative-treated wood in a wetland boardwalk. Res. Pap. FPL-RP-582. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplrp/fplrp582.pdf
U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 1999. Wood handbook—wood as an engineering material. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory. 463 p. Available at: http://www.fpl.fs.fed.us/documnts/fplgtr/fplgtr113/fplgtr113.htm
Weis, P; Weis, J.S.; Greenburg, A.; Nosker, T.J. 1992. Toxicity of construction materials in the marine environment: a comparison of chromated-copper-arsenate treated wood and recycled plastic. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 22: 99-106.
Western Wood Preservers Institute. 1996. Best management practices for the use of treated wood in aquatic environments. Vancouver, WA: Western Wood Preservers Institute. 35 p. Available at: http://www.wwpinstitute.org/pdffiles/bmpsinaquatic.pdf
Western Wood Preservers Institute. [no date] Management of used treated wood products. Vancouver, WA: Western Wood Preservers Institute. 35 p. Web site: http://www.wwpinstitute.org/mainpages/disposaloftreated.shtml
Western Wood Preservers Institute. [no date]. Guide to the characteristics, use and specifications of pressure-treated wood. Vancouver, WA: Western Wood Preservers Institute. 13 p. Available at: http://www.wwpinstitute.org/mainpages/guidetochar-use/center.htm