Skip to Main Content
A comparison of four electroshocking procedures for assessing the abundance of smallmouth bass in Wisconsin streams.Author(s): John Lyons; Paul Kanehl
Source: General Technical Report NC-159. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (7.73 MB)
DescriptionCritically examines four electrofishing methods commonly used to estimate the abundance of smallmouth bass in wadeable streams, and provides guidelines for sampling smallmouth bass in streams of Wisconsin and nearby areas.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationLyons, John; Kanehl, Paul. 1993. A comparison of four electroshocking procedures for assessing the abundance of smallmouth bass in Wisconsin streams. General Technical Report NC-159. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
Keywordselectrofishing, smallmouth bass, Micropterus dolomieu, fisheries management
- A non-invasive sampling method for detecting non-native smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu)
- Diet Overlap and Predation between Smallmouth Bass and Walleye in a North Temperate Lake
- Habitat Features Affecting Smallmouth Bass Micropterus dolomieu Nesting Success in Four Northern Wisconsin Lakes
XML: View XML