Skip to Main Content
Clone expansion and competition between quaking and bigtooth aspen suckers after clearcutting.Author(s): Donald A. Perala
Source: Research Paper NC-201. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: View PDF (631.17 KB)
DescriptionQuaking aspen clones expanded over more area, and regenerated greater sucker stem densities and biomass than did bigtooth aspen clones. However, sucker height growth was similar between the two species.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationPerala, Donald A. 1981. Clone expansion and competition between quaking and bigtooth aspen suckers after clearcutting. Research Paper NC-201. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
KeywordsPopulus tremuloides, Populus grandidentata, quaking aspen, bigtooth aspen, Minnesota, biomass regeneration, coppice
- Decline of quaking aspen in the Interior West - examples from Utah
- Quaking aspen productivity recovers after repeated prescribed fire.
- Decline of aspen (Populus tremuloides) in the Interior West [Abstract 2]
XML: View XML