Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
Weighing conservation objectives: maximum expected coverage versus endangered species protectionAuthor(s): Jeffrey L. Arthur; Jeffrey D. Camm; Robert G. Haight; Claire A. Montgomery; Stephen Polasky
Source: Ecological applications. 14(6): 1936-1945.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (578.85 KB)
DescriptionDecision makers involved in land acquisition and protection often have multiple conservation objectives and are uncertain about the occurrence of species or other features in candidate sites. Model informing decisions on selection of sites for reserves need to provide information about cost-efficient trade-offs between objectives and account for incidence uncertainty. We describe a site selection model with two important conservation objectives: maximize expected number of species represented, and maximize the likelihood that a subset of endangered species is represented. The model uses probabilistic species occurrence data in a linear-integer formulation solvable with commercial software. The model is illustrated using probabilistic occurrence data for 403 terrestrial vertebrates in 147 candidate sites in western Oregon, USA. The trade-offs between objectives are explicitly measured by incrementally varying the threshold probability for endangered species representation and recording the change in expected number of species represented. For instance, in the example presented here, we found that under most budget constraints, the probability of representing three endangered species can be increased from 0.00 (i.e., no guaranteed protection) to 0.90 while reducing expected species representation ∼2%. However, further increasing the probability of endangered species representation from 0.90 to 0.99 results in a much larger reduction in species representation of ∼14%. Although the numerical results from our analysis are specific to the species and area studied, the methodology is general and applicable elsewhere.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationArthur, Jeffrey L.; Camm, Jeffrey D.; Haight, Robert G.; Montgomery, Claire A.; Polasky, Stephen. 2004. Weighing conservation objectives: maximum expected coverage versus endangered species protection. Ecological applications. 14(6): 1936-1945.
Keywordsconservation, endangered species, goal trade-offs, optimization, Oregon, site selection model, species representation
- Metropolitan open-space protection with uncertain site availability
- A scenario optimization model for dynamic reserve site selection
- An optimization approach to selecting research natural areas in National Forests
XML: View XML