Skip to Main Content
Is Cull Overestimated in Northern Hardwood Stands?Author(s): Charles L. Stayton; Richard M. Marden
Source: Research Note NC-97. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
Publication Series: Research Note (RN)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: View PDF (1.27 MB)
DescriptionTo determine whether overestimated cull could partly explain differences between bid offers and appraised values of northern hardwood timber, cull volume estimated by the accepted method was compared with actual cull volume measured from flitch photographs and log-scaled cull volume.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationStayton, Charles L.; Marden, Richard M. 1970. Is Cull Overestimated in Northern Hardwood Stands?. Research Note NC-97. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
- Growth and decay losses in Colorado aspen
- Differences in Computed Individual-Tree Volumes Caused by Differences in Field Measurements
- Incidence and impact of damage to East Oklahoma's timber, 1986
XML: View XML