Skip to Main Content
Controlling Hazel, Aspen Suckers, and Mountain Maple with PicloramAuthor(s): Donald A. Perala
Source: Research Note NC-129. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
Publication Series: Research Note (RN)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: View PDF (1.34 MB)
DescriptionTests showed that picloram/2,4-D mixture was equal to or superior to 2,4-D alone or a 2,4,5-D/2,4,5-T mixture in controlling hazel, aspen suckers, and mountain maple for reforestation purposes. Survival of red pine planted 9 months after treatment was not influenced by residual soil effects of picloram. However, foliar application contributed to mortality of established red pine.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationPerala, Donald A. 1971. Controlling Hazel, Aspen Suckers, and Mountain Maple with Picloram. Research Note NC-129. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station
KeywordsSite Preparation, plantation release, red pine, forest weeds
- Effects of prescribed burning on hazel in Minnesota
- Integrating molecular tools and conventional approaches in the Oregon State University hazelnut breeding program
- A genetic linkage map for hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) based on RAPD and SSR markerswac
XML: View XML