Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Jacek Bankowski; Daniel C. Dey; Rice Jim; Eric Boysen; Roj Miller
    Date: 1995
    Source: Forest Research Information Paper. Issue 128. 1995. pp. 1-28
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: North Central Research Station
    PDF: View PDF  (1.26 MB)

    Description

    SILVAH, a stand growth simulator commonly used in the northeastern United States, has been evaluated by comparing predicted and actual growth of tolerant hardwoods in southern Ontario. The data came from 139 stands, unmanaged or managed (thinned), even-aged or uneven-aged. The data were used to test the accuracy of diameter distribution, basal area, mean quadratic DBH, number of trees per hectare, and stand volume predictions for periods from 5 to 20 years. The accuracy of short-term basal area projections, expressed by modelling efficiency, ranged from 62% to 94%. The reliability of stand density projections was especially low (modelling efficiency from 15% to 88%). Despite underpredicting the number of trees in small DBH classes, SILVAH provided reliable predictions of DBH distribution, especially for unevenaged, unmanaged stands. Basal area of stands was underestimated by 2% to 6% on the average for 5-year projections (except for low productivity sites). During the same projection period, the error of predicted individual stand basal area ranged from -22% to 25%. Prediction bias increased with longer projection periods. The trend of underestimating stand density and overestimating mean quadratic DBH resulted from low predicted numbers of small DBH trees. Consequently, the basal area of pole and small sawlog timber classes was underestimated (on the average 1% to 28% in 5 years). A few factors contributed to the poor performance of the model: 1) lack of ingrowth data or lack of an automatic ingrowth submodel; 2) incompatibility of model requirements and data sets related to the range of tree sizes in the input list; and 3) inability of the model to account for differences in site productivity.

    Publication Notes

    • Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
    • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
    • During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
    • Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Bankowski, Jacek; Dey, Daniel C.; Jim, Rice; Boysen, Eric; Miller, Roj 1995. Validation of SILVAH for tolerant hardwoods in Ontario. Forest Research Information Paper. Issue 128. 1995. pp. 1-28

    Keywords

    growth model, tolerant hardwood, thinning, timber class, basal area, stand density, stand volume

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page