Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
The language of nature matters: we need a more public ecologyAuthor(s): Bruce R. Hull; David P. Robertson
Source: In: Gobster, Paul H.; R. Bruce, eds. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press: 97-118. 2000
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: View PDF (1.63 MB)
DescriptionThe language we use to describe nature matters. It is used by policy analysts to set goals for ecological restoration and management, by scientists to describe the nature that did, does, or could exist, and by all of us to imagine possible and acceptable conditions of environmental quality. Participants in environmental decision making demand a lot of the language and terminology used to discuss nature.We expect it to be precise and valid (i.e., we expect it to allow accurate scientific descriptions of the environment and of environmental quality). We also expect it to be powerful and fair (i.e., we expect it to help stakeholders negotiate acceptable and achievable goals for environmental management). The problem is that the language of nature is often neither precise nor value neutral. There exist multiple, conflicting, imprecise, and biased definitions of the terms used to discuss nature. These vagaries of language can cause conflict that delays or derails well-intentioned efforts to restore and manage nature. This conflict results when people use the same terms to intentionally or unintentionally mean different things or use particular definitions to suppress or promote particular values.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHull, Bruce R.; Robertson, David P. 2000. The language of nature matters: we need a more public ecology. In: Gobster, Paul H.; R. Bruce, eds. Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities. Washington, DC: Island Press: 97-118. 2000
Keywordslanguage, environmental quality, restoration, ecology
- Understandings of Environmental Quality: Ambiguities and Values Held by Environmental Professionals
- Which nature? A case study of Whitetop Mountain
- Wildfire and management of forests and native fishes: Conflict or opportunity for convergent solutions?
XML: View XML