Skip to Main Content
Inroduction: diverse perspectives on communityAuthor(s): Pamela J. Jakes; Dorothy Anderson
Source: Society & Natural Resources. Volume 13. 2000. pp. 395-397
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (170.23 KB)
DescriptionA glance through the table of contents of any social science journal illustrates that social science disciplines define community quite differently. For example, geographers emphasize spatial aspects, economists emphasize work and markets, and sociologists emphasize social interactions and networks in their definitions of communities. As a scientific concept, community is very broad and difficult to define. Forty-five years ago, Hillery (1955) found 94 different definitions of community in the scientific literature, all using some combination of space, people, and social interactions in the definitions. Regardless of how you define community, the concept is central to resource management and use: "Human attitudes and values are vested within community and definitions of resources emerge from community" (Lee et al. 1990, 9).
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationJakes, Pamela J.; Anderson, Dorothy. 2000. Inroduction: diverse perspectives on community. Society & Natural Resources. Volume 13. 2000. pp. 395-397
Keywordssocial science, community, urbanization
- Introduction: Diverse Perspectives on Community
- Wilderness values: Perspectives from non-economic social science
- Using social science to understand and improve wildland fire organizations: an annotated reading list
XML: View XML