Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
The carbon consequences of thinning techniques: stand structure makes a differenceAuthor(s): Coeli Hoover; Susan Stout
Source: Journal of Forestry. July/August: 266-270.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (181.26 KB)
DescriptionUsing results from a 25-year study of thinning in a northwestern Pennsylvania Allegheny hardwood stand, we assess whether and how thinning method affected carbon sequestration and merchantable volume production. Plots were thinned to similar residual relative density by removing trees from different portions of the diameter distribution. Plots that were thinned from below had greater volume production and carbon sequestration rates than plots that were thinned from the middle or thinned from above. Control plots, which were not thinned, also had higher carbon sequestration rates than plots thinned from the middle and higher merchantable volume production and carbon sequestration rates than plots thinned from above. In this forest type, changing stand structure by thinning can affect carbon sequestration and stand growth either positively or negatively. Those effects can be significant, with long-term implications for the growth of the stand. In general, structures that favored volume production also favor carbon sequestration.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHoover, Coeli; Stout, Susan. 2007. The carbon consequences of thinning techniques: stand structure makes a difference. Journal of Forestry. July/August: 266-270.
Keywordscarbon sequestration, thinning, forest carbon
- Wood volume increment in thinned, 50- to 55-year-old, mixed-species Allegheny hardwoods
- Modeling the effects of forest management on in situ and ex situ longleaf pine forest carbon stocks
- The effects of stand structure after thinning on the growth of an Allegheny hardwood stand
XML: View XML