Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Robert A. Sargent; John C. Kilgo; Briand R. Chapman; Karl V. Miller
    Date: 1998
    Source: Journal of Wildlife Management 62(4):1438-1442
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: View PDF  (168 KB)


    Nesting success of songbirds often is poor in edge-dominated habitats. Because the spatial juxtaposition of forest fragments relative to other habitats may influence nest success, we tested the hypothesis that the depredation rate for bird nests in small hardwood forests would decrease if the degree of edge contrast with adjoining habitats was reduced. Over 4 trials, we placed 672 artificial nests (336 each at shrub and ground levels divided equally between edge and interior locations) in small (range = 0.5-5.0 ha) hardwood forest stands enclosed by either agricultural fields (n = 7) or mature pine forest (n = 7). Nest predation was greater (P = 0.001) in field-enclosed stands (35%) than in pine-enclosed stands (20%) because of greater (P = 0.03) predation of shrub nests. No differences (P > 0.05) in predation rates were detected between stand types for ground nests or between strata (i.e., ground nests vs. shrub nests) within field-enclosed stands. Predation rates did not differ (P > 0.05) between edge and interior nests between or within stand types. Nest predation by avian species was not suspected in pine-enclosed stands (OQ), but 18% of the nests depredated in agriculture-enclosed stands was attributed to birds. The low edge contrast associated with pine-enclosed stands appeared to attract fewer nest predators, especially those that preyed on shrub nests. However, the value of lower predation rates for shrub nests in pine-enclosed stands may be offset by the presence of fewer shrub-nesting sites relative to similar-sized field-enclosed stands, because understory development was impoverished probably as a result of reduced sunlight penetration.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Sargent, Robert A.; Kilgo, John C.; Chapman, Briand R.; Miller, Karl V. 1998. Predation of Artificial Nests in Hardwood Fragments Enclosed by Pine and Agricultural Habitats. Journal of Wildlife Management 62(4):1438-1442


    artificial nests, Coturnix coturnix, fragmentation, predation

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page