Skip to Main Content
Comparison of two cut-to-length harvesting systems operating in eastern hardwoodsAuthor(s): Chris B. LeDoux; Niel K. Huyler
Source: International Journal of Forest Engineering. 12(1): 53-59.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (1.13 MB)
DescriptionWe compared production rates, operating costs, and break-even points (BEP) for small and large cut-to-length (CTL) harvesting systems operating at several machine utilization rates (MUR) in mixed hardwood and softwood stands in Vermont.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationLeDoux, Chris B.; Huyler, Niel K. 2001. Comparison of two cut-to-length harvesting systems operating in eastern hardwoods. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 12(1): 53-59.
Keywordscut-to-length harvesting, production rate, cost, break-even point, hardwoods, singlegrip harvester, processor, slashber, partial cutting, thinning
- Comparison of timber utilization between a tree-length and an in-wood chipping harvesting operations
- Mechanized or hand operations: which is less expensive for small timber?
- TOC and TRIZ: using a dual-methodological approach to solve a forest harvesting problem
XML: View XML