Skip to Main Content
The value of research in recreation fee project implementationAuthor(s): James D. Absher; Daniel W. McCollum; J. Michael Bowker
Source: Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 17(3): 116-120.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (75 KB)
DescriptionIn a survey of Forest Service managers responsible for implementation of recreation fee programs, research skills were perceived to provide little benefit to business or communications planning. A majority of managers reported, however, that they used research data they collected or contracted for when developing and implementing their fee programs. They rated the usefulness of that information very high relative to other sources used. Few reports of formal studies prior to fee implementation suggest that a substantial part of the research that occurred was very casual in nature. Since implementation, most managers are not collecting any information to help evaluate success or failure of the fee program to accomplish program objectives
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationAbsher, James D.; McCollum, Daniel W.; Bowker, J. Michael. 1999. The value of research in recreation fee project implementation. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 17(3): 116-120.
- Longitudinal Monitoring of Public Reactions to the U.S
- Recreation fees: attitudes and perceptions of Region 6 Forest Service employees in recreation positions and non-recreation positions
- Support for wilderness recreation fees: The influence of fee purpose and day versus overnight use
XML: View XML