Skip to Main Content
Due to a lapse in federal funding, this USDA website will not be actively updated. Once funding has been reestablished, online operations will continue.
Putting multiple use and sustained yield into a landscape contextAuthor(s): Thomas R. Crow
Source: In: Liu, Jianguo; Taylor, William W., eds. Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 349-365
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: View PDF (2.53 MB)
DescriptionWhen managing natural resources, foresters, wildlife biologists, and other practitioners need to consider a vast array of technical information, along with a multitude of values, opinions, and perspectives - many of which may be in conflict and therefore difficult to resolve. Ongoing discussions about ecosystem management, conserving biological diversiry, adaptive management, and sustainable development reflect heightened concerns about sustaining natural resources and resolving conflicts among competing interests and demands (e.g., Walters, 1986; Rowe, 1992; Grumbine, 1997; Bunnell, 1998; Tollefson, 1998; Yaffee, 1999). In response to these and related concerns, the Secretary-General of the United Nations established the World Commission on Environment and Development in 1983, headed by Gro Harlem Brundtland, then Prime Minister of Norway. In their landmark assessment - commonly known as the Brundtland Report - the Commission firmly connected environmental degradation with diminished economic opportunity, human health, and quality of life. In addition, they proposed long-term strategies for achieving sustainable development in a world characterized by great extremes in resource availability and utilization. They suggested multilateral approaches to transcend national sovereignties, political ideologies, and scientific disciplines so that common problems could be identified and common goals pursued. There is increasing recognition that a more comprehensive and integrated approach is needed to resource planning and management (Boyce and Haney, 1997; Kohm and Franklin, 1997; Vogt et al., 1997). In this chapter, I begin with the premise that principles and concepts from landscape ecology can contribute in a significant way to practicing integrated resource management. I explore this premise by considering the science of landscape ecology in relation to the two important management paradigms - multiple use and sustained yield - that have guided forest management in North America for the past 100 years.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCrow, Thomas R. 2002. Putting multiple use and sustained yield into a landscape context. In: Liu, Jianguo; Taylor, William W., eds. Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press: 349-365
- Considering diverse knowledge systems in forest landscape restoration
- Personal, societal, and ecological values of wilderness: Sixth World Wilderness Congress proceedings on research, management, and allocation, Volume I
- Traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management and provision of ecosystem services
XML: View XML