Skip to Main Content
Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neighborhoods in Baltimore, MarylandAuthor(s): J. Morgan Grove; Mary L. Cadenasso; William R., Jr. Burch; Steward T. Pickett; Kirsten Schwarz; Jarlath O'Neil-Dunne; Matthew Wilson; Austin Troy; Christopher Boone
Source: Society and Natural Resources 19:117-136
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: Northeastern Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (1.85 MB)
DescriptionRecent advances in remote sensing and the adoption of geographic information systems (GIS) have greatly increased the availibility of high-resolution spatial and attribute data for examing the relationship between social and vegetation structure in urban areas. There are several motivations for understanding this relationship. First, the United States has experienced a significant increase in the extent of urbanized land. Second, urban foresters increasingly recognize their need for data about urban forestry types, owners and property regimes, and associated social goods, benefits, and services. Third, previous research has focused primarily on the distribution of vegetation cover or diversity. However, little is known about (1) whether vegetation structure varies among urban neighborhoods and (2) whether the motivations, pathways, and capacities for vegetation management vary among households and communities. In this article, we describe novel data and methods from Baltimore, MD, and the Baltimore Ecosystem Study (BES) to address these two questions.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGrove, J. Morgan; Cadenasso, Mary L.; Burch, William R., Jr.; Pickett, Steward T.; Schwarz, Kirsten; O''Neil-Dunne, Jarlath; Wilson, Matthew; Troy, Austin; Boone, Christopher. 2006. Data and methods comparing social structure and vegetation structure of urban neighborhoods in Baltimore, Maryland. Society and Natural Resources 19:117-136
KeywordsBaltimore, landcover, LTER, remote-sensing, social structure. urban ecology, vegetation
- Assessing and comparing relationships between urban environmental stewardship networks and land cover in Baltimore and Seattle
- Vegetation cover in relation to socioeconomic factors in a tropical city assessed from sub-meter resolution imagery
- Carbon storage by urban soils in the United States
XML: View XML