Skip to Main Content
Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sitesAuthor(s): Herbert W. Schroeder; L.M. Anderson
Source: Journal of Leisure Research 16(2):178-194
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Station: North Central Research Station
PDF: View PDF (691.81 KB)
DescriptionPhotograph of 17 urban recreation sites in Chicago and Atlanta were evaluated by college students (n = 68) in Illinois, Georgia, and Michigan, for either perceived security, scenic quality, or both. For most raters, high visibility and developed park features significantly enhanced perceived security. Scenic quality, on the other hand, was enhanced for the majority of evaluators by a high degree of naturalness and vegetation. For both perceived safety and scenic quality, a small minority of raters held preferences quite different from the majority.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationSchroeder, Herbert W.; Anderson, L.M. 1984. Perception of personal safety in urban recreation sites. Journal of Leisure Research 16(2):178-194
KeywordsUrban parks, crime, public safety, scenic quality
- Modeling the scenic beauty of the Highland Scenic Highway, West Virginia
- In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: the effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood
- Use and users of the Appalachian Trail: a geographic study
XML: View XML