Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Paul H. Gobster
    Date: 1996
    Source: In: Brunson, Mark W.; Kruger, Linda E.; Tyler, Catherine B.; Schroeder, Susan A., tech. eds. Defining social acceptability in ecosystem management: a workshop proceedings; 1992 June 23-25, Kelso, WA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-369. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 77-97.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: North Central Research Station
    PDF: View PDF  (990.45 KB)

    Description

    The social acceptability of 'ecosystem management' and related new forestry programs hinges on how people view the forest environment and what it means to them. For many, these conceptions are based on a 'scenic aesthetic" that is dramatic and visual, where both human and natural changes are perceived negatively. In contrast, appreciation of biologically diverse forests created through ecosystem management practices depends on experience of the subtle, multimodal characteristics of a dynamic environment, an aesthetic attitude that is acquired and cognitive rather than immediate and affective. Society is unlikely to quickly adopt this 'ecological aesthetic' as espoused by Aldo Leopold and others. However, the concept of appropriateness could serve as a short-term alternative for resolving perceived conflicts between aesthetic and biodiversity values. Unlike scenic assessments, assessments of appropriateness address the question 'what belongs where?' and work to integrate aesthetic and biodiversity goals rather than to seek absolutes. This concept also ties aesthetics together with land ethics by seeking a harmonious 'fit' between human activity and the natural world. Approaches are outlined that suggest how perceptions of appropriateness might be studied and used in the context of ecosystem management practices. Additional thought is given to how researchers and managers can begin to broaden ideas of forest aesthetics over the long term.

    Publication Notes

    • Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
    • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
    • During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
    • Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Gobster, Paul H. 1996. Forest aesthetics, biodiversity, and the perceived appropriateness of ecosystem management practices. In: Brunson, Mark W.; Kruger, Linda E.; Tyler, Catherine B.; Schroeder, Susan A., tech. eds. Defining social acceptability in ecosystem management: a workshop proceedings; 1992 June 23-25, Kelso, WA. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-369. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 77-97.

    Keywords

    Scenic beauty, biodiversity, ecological aesthetic, visual management practices, ecosystem management, landscape aesthetic, appropriateness, human-landscape interactions

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/14866