Skip to Main Content
Is there a better metric than site index to indicate the productivity of forested lands?Author(s): Maria E. Blanco Martin; Michael Hoppus; Andrew Lister; James A. Westfall
Source: In: McRoberts, Ronald E.; Reams, Gregory A.; Van Deusen, Paul C.; McWilliams, William H., eds. Proceedings of the eighth annual forest inventory and analysis symposium; 2006 October 16-19; Monterey, CA. Gen. Tech. Report WO-79. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 355-362.
Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)
Station: Washington Office
PDF: Download Publication (2.54 MB)
DescriptionThe Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program selects site trees for each plot that are used to measure site productivity. The ability of a site to produce wood volume is indicated indirectly by comparing total tree height with tree age. This comparison assumes that the rate of height growth is strongly related to site quality and is insensitive to basal area, species composition, and stand structure. Research indicates that stand age is often difficult to determine, especially in uneven-aged stands. Furthermore, stands with mixed species compositions and less than full stocking cause problems when using site index as a predictor of site growing capacity. Now that the FIA program has thousands of plots in which volume has been remeasured, other metrics for site quality can be evaluated by noting the observed past growth of the trees on the plot and comparing it with the height-age relationship. This study describes the first steps of this effort.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationMartin, Maria E. Blanco; Hoppus, Michael; Lister, Andrew; Westfall, James A. 2009. Is there a better metric than site index to indicate the productivity of forested lands?. In: McRoberts, Ronald E.; Reams, Gregory A.; Van Deusen, Paul C.; McWilliams, William H., eds. Proceedings of the eighth annual forest inventory and analysis symposium; 2006 October 16-19; Monterey, CA. Gen. Tech. Report WO-79. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 355-362.
- Genetic improvement effects on growth and yield of loblolly pine plantations
- Baseline results from the Lichen Community Indicator Program in the Pacific Northwest: Air quality patterns and evidence of a nitrogen pollution problem
- Stand dynamics of Douglas-fir 20 years after precommercial thinning and nitrogen fertilization on a poor-quality site
XML: View XML