Skip to Main Content
How forest context influences the acceptability of prescribed burning and mechanical thinningAuthor(s): Alan D. Bright; Peter Newman
Source: In: McCaffrey, S.M., tech. ed. The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-1. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 47-52.
Publication Series: Other
Station: Northern Research Station
PDF: View PDF (375.53 KB)
DescriptionWe examined how forest factors influenced public perceptions of three fuels management alternatives: prescribed burns, mechanical thinning, or no artificial fire management. The factors included the forest?s proximity to urban areas, primary use, wildfire history, and current fire conditions. Surveying three study strata with different wildfire histories and experiences?the Colorado Front Range, southern Illinois, and Metropolitan Chicago?we found that current forest conditions was the most important factor influencing how residents feel about the three treatments. Proximity of the forest to urban areas and wildfire history also significantly influenced perceptions of wildfire management techniques, although less strongly. Notably, few differences were found in the relative effects of contextual factors on perceptions across the three geographic regions.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBright, Alan D.; Newman, Peter. 2006. How forest context influences the acceptability of prescribed burning and mechanical thinning. In: McCaffrey, S.M., tech. ed. The public and wildland fire management: social science findings for managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-1. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station: 47-52.
Keywordscommunication, fuels treatments, defensible space, wildfire management, social acceptance, education, wildland urban interface
- Historical perspective on the influence of wildfire policy, law, and informal institutions on management and forest resilience in a multiownership, frequent-fire, coupled human and natural system in Oregon, USA
- Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland-urban interface homeowners' wildfire risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes
- The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: The case of wildfire in high risk communities
XML: View XML