Skip to Main Content
Planted Pines do not Respond to Bedding on an Acadia-Beauregard-Kolin Silt Loam SiteAuthor(s): James D. Haywood
Source: Res. Note SO-259. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 4 p.
Publication Series: Research Note (RN)
Station: Southern Forest Experiment Station
Download Publication (63 KB)
DescriptionAverage height and volume of loblolly and slash pines were not affected by site treatment or soil differences 15 years after planting on an Acadia-Beauregard-Kolin silt loam site. Slash pine averaged 2.04 m more in height and yielded 22 percent more volume per hectare than did loblolly pine.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHaywood, James D. 1980. Planted Pines do not Respond to Bedding on an Acadia-Beauregard-Kolin Silt Loam Site. Res. Note SO-259. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 4 p.
Keywordssite preparation, Pinus taeda, Pinus elliottii var. elliottii
- Comparison of planted loblolly, longleaf, and slash pine development through 10 growing seasons in central Louisiana--an argument for longleaf pine
- Performance of loblolly and slash pine nursery selections
- Precommercial thinning of naturally seeded slash pine increases volume and monetary returns
XML: View XML