Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Daniel A. Herms; William J. Mattson
    Date: 1991
    Source: In: Baranchikov, Yuri N.; Mattson, William J.; Hain, Fred P.; Payne, Thomas L., eds. Forest Insect Guilds: Patterns of Interaction with Host Trees; 1989 August 13-17; Abakan, Siberia, U.S.S.R. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-153. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 35-46
    Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)
    Station: Northeastern Research Station
    PDF: View PDF  (888.0 KB)

    Description

    A general principle of adaptive allocation was proposed by Cody (1966) who hypothesized that 1) all living organisms have finite resources to partition among growth and competing physiological processes such as reproduction and defense; and 2) natural selection results in the evolution of unique resource allocation patterns that maximize fitness in different environments. Today, it is well established that plants have limited resources to allocate among these processes (Bazzaz et al. 1987), and theories of life-history strategy rests on the assumption that there are fitness trade-offs associated with varying patterns of resource allocation (Steams 1976, 1989, Reznick 1985, Bazzaz et al. 1987, Lovett Doust 1989). Trade-offs occur when an increase in resources allocated to one fitness component, such as growth, reduces the allocation to another, such as reproduction. Natural selection (acting within phylogenetic, physiological, and ecological constraints) should shape patterns of resource allocation, balancing the costs and benefits associated with these trade-offs, resulting in the evolution of life- history strategies maximizing fitness. There are direct and indirect costs associated with allocation to "nongrowth" processes such as reproduction. Direct costs are energy and assimilates invested in reproductive structures. Indirect costs are unrealized growth and future reproduction as a result of this investment (Bazzaz and Reekie 1985, Bloom et al. 1985, Bazzaz et al. 1987, Reekie and Bazzaz 1987c, Ronsheim 1988, Lovett Doust 1989).

    Publication Notes

    • Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
    • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
    • During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
    • Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Herms, Daniel A.; Mattson, William J. 1991. Does reproduction compromise defense in woody plants?. In: Baranchikov, Yuri N.; Mattson, William J.; Hain, Fred P.; Payne, Thomas L., eds. Forest Insect Guilds: Patterns of Interaction with Host Trees; 1989 August 13-17; Abakan, Siberia, U.S.S.R. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-153. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station: 35-46.

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/19519