Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Urs Buehlmann; Matthew Bumgardner; Torsten Lihra; Mary Frye
    Date: 2006
    Source: Journal of Global Marketing. 20(1): 61-73.
    Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
    Station: Northern Research Station
    PDF: Download Publication  (121.64 KB)


    While much has been written regarding the declining global competitiveness of U.S. furniture manufacturing and the subsequent loss of domestic market share and jobs, less is known about the role of retailers in furniture importing. This study investigated the attitudes of U.S. furniture retailers toward China, Canada, and the United States as manufacturing sources for residential furniture and their perceptions of consumer interest in country of origin for furniture manufacturing. The study was based on a nationwide survey in 2005 of the membership of a large U.S. home furnishings trade association. Over half of the retailers surveyed indicated that they did not always know where the products they sold were made; but many consumers were asking about the country of origin of furniture products. The ?halo effect? associated with preference for home country described in previous country or origin studies was confirmed in this study, but in a situation where the domestic source had already lost much of its market share. Low price was the only attribute for which China was rated higher than the U.S or Canada, reinforcing the ?China price? phenomenon discussed in the literature. Adjusting for the halo revealed several opportunities for U.S. and Canadian firms to compete in the U.S. wood furniture market on non-price factors. Those retailers sourcing furniture from China were found to have more favorable perceptions of Chinese goods than those not sourcing from China; although both groups had equally favorable perceptions of the U.S. as a furniture source. Priorities for competitive strategies for manufacturers in each source country are noted based on the findings.

    Publication Notes

    • Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
    • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
    • During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
    • Please contact Sharon Hobrla, if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Buehlmann, Urs; Bumgardner, Matthew; Lihra, Torsten; Frye, Mary. 2006. Attitudes of U.S. retailers toward China, Canada, and the United States as manufacturing sources for furniture: an assessment of competitive priorities. Journal of Global Marketing. 20(1): 61-73.


    country of origin, wood household furniture, low-cost production, retailer attitudes

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page