Skip to Main Content
A systematic bias in the interpretation of CFI resultsAuthor(s): Warren E. Frayer
Source: Research Note NE-60. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 4p.
Publication Series: Research Note (RN)
Station: Northeastern Research Station
PDF: Download Publication (174.49 KB)
DescriptionIt is not generally recognized that a serious bias arises in the estimates of annual ingrowth and accretion, two of the growth components available from continuous forest inventory (CFI). The bias is demonstrated, and suggestions for correction are given.
- Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat.
- During the capture process some typographical errors may occur.
- Please contact Sharon Hobrla, email@example.com if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationFrayer, Warren E. 1967. A systematic bias in the interpretation of CFI results. Research Note NE-60. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 4p.
- Forest inventory and stratified estimation: a cautionary note
- Statistical treatment for the wet bias in tree-ring chronologies: A case study from the InteriorWest, USA
- Impact of Bias-Correction Type and Conditional Training on Bayesian Model Averaging over the Northeast United States
XML: View XML