Skip to Main Content
A comparison of a technical and a participatory application of social impact assessment.Author(s): Dennis R Becker; Charles C Harris; Erik A Nielsen; William J. McLaughlin
Source: Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 22(3): 177-189
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: Download Publication (1.37 MB)
DescriptionResults of independent applications of a technical and a participatory approach to SIA are compared for an assessment of impacts of the proposed removal of hydroelectric dams to recover threatened and endangered salmon in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. The analysis focuses on empirical differences and similarities between the technical social analysis report (SAR) and the participatory interactive community forum (IC19 in terms of indicators used, projection of impacts, and types of social impacts identified in two communilies. The SAR used a more homogeneous set of social structures and indicators to make expertbased projections. The ICF did not limit indicators to those aggregated across the region, but revealed residents' perceptions of impacts to their communities. A combination of the two approaches would provide robust findings of social impacts.
- Visit PNW's Publication Request Page to request a hard copy of this publication.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationBecker, Dennis R; Harris, Charles C; Nielsen, Erik A; McLaughlin, William J. 2004. A comparison of a technical and a participatory application of social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 22(3): 177-189
KeywordsSIA, technical, participatory, social indicators, impact projection, EIS
- Community, know thyself: caring about place.
- Implications of variation in social-ecological systems for the development of U.S. fungal management policy
- Results of community deliberation about social impacts of ecological restoration: comparing public input of self-selected versus actively engaged community members
XML: View XML