Skip to Main Content
Growth and Branching of Young Cottonwoods After PruningAuthor(s): Roger M. Krinard
Source: Res. Note SO-208. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 3 p.
Publication Series: Research Note (RN)
Station: Southern Forest Experiment Station
PDF: View PDF (72 KB)
DescriptionAlthough spring and summer pruning to various heights reduced diameter growth for the treatment year, diameter increment of most pruned trees did not differ significantly from that of controls 2 years after treatment. Total diameter growth during the test period was significantly less for pruned trees than for controls. Epicormic branching increased with spring treatments and with greater pruning heights. Pruning is apparently necessary to obtain high-quality stems. Summer prunings are preferable to spring ones, and no more than one-third of the total height measured during the dormant season should be pruned.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationKrinard, Roger M. 1976. Growth and Branching of Young Cottonwoods After Pruning. Res. Note SO-208. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. 3 p.
KeywordsPopulus deltoides, wood quality, epicormic branching, sawtimber, veneer
- Ten Years' Growth of Pruned and Unpruned Cottonwood Planted at 40- by 40-Foot Spacing
- Five Years' Growth of Pruned and Unpruned Cottonwood Planted at 40- by 40-Foot Spacing
- Biological response of plantation cottonwood to spacing, pruning and thinning
XML: View XML