Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): James D. Wickham; Robert V. Oneil; Kurt H. RiittersElizabeth R. Smith; Timothy G. Wade; K. Bruce Jones
    Date: 2001
    Source: Ecological Applications, September, 223-236
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: View PDF  (954 KB)


    Urbanization replaced the extant natural resource base (e.g., forests, wetlands) with an infrastructure that is capable of supporting humans. One ecological consequence of ubranization is higher concentraations of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) in continuing urbanization will chance the relative distribution of extant natural resources. Characterisitics of the landscape can shape its response to disturbances such as urbanization. Changes in landscape characteristics across a region create a geographic pattern of vulnerability to increased N and P as a result of urbanization. We linked nutrient-export risk and urbanization models in order to identify areas most vulnerable to increases in nutrient-export risk due to projected urbanization a risk-based model of N and P export exceeding specified thresholds was developed based on the extant distribution of forest, agriculture, and urban land cover. An empirical model of urbanization was used to increase urban land cover at the expense of forest and agriculture. The modeled (future) land cover was input into the N and P export risk model. and the "before" and "after" estimates of N and P export were compared to identify the areas most vulnerable to change. Increase in N and P export had to be equal to or greater than the accumulated uncertainties in the nutrient-export risk and urbanization models for an area to be considered vulnerable. The areas most vulnerable to increased N and P export were not spatially coincident with the areas of greatest urbanization. vulnerability also depended on the geographic distribution of forest and agriculture. In general, the areas most vulnerable to increased N exports were where the modeled urbanization rate was at least 20% and the amount of forest was about 6 times greater than the amount of agriculture, for P, the most vulnerable areas were where the modeled urbanization rate was at least 20% and the amount of forest was about 2 times greater than the amount of agriculture. Vulnerability to increased N and P export was the result of two interacting spatial patterns, urbanization and the extant distribution of land cover. It could not be predicted from either alone.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Wickham, James D.; Oneil, Robert V.; Riitters, Kurt H.; Smith, Elizabeth R.; Wade, Timothy G.; Jones, K. Bruce. 2001. Geographic targeting of increases in nutrient export due to future urbanization. Ecological Applications, September, 223-236


    Export of N and P., vulnerability to, geographic modeling, GIS. land-cover change, land cover, forest of agriculture, landscape character affects pullution vulnerability, mid-Atlantic states (USA), modeling, empirical and risk based, nitrogen, phosphorus, regional-scale analysis, risk assessment, urbanization, existing and predicted

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page