Skip to Main Content
Costs of landscape silviculture for fire and habitat management.Author(s): S. Hummel; D.E. Calkin
Source: Forest ecology and management. 207(3): 385-404
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: Download Publication (2.1 MB)
DescriptionIn forest reserves of the U.S. Pacific Northwest, management objectives include protecting late-semi habitat structure by reducing the threat of large-scale disturbances like wildfire. We simulated how altering within- and among-stand structure with silvicultural treatments of differing intensity affected late-seral forest (LSF) structure and fire threat (FT) reduction over 30 years in a 6070-ha reserve. We then evaluated how different financial requirements influenced the treatment mix selected for each decade, the associated effects on FT reduction and LSF structure in the reserve, and treatment costs. Requirements for treatments to earn money (NPV+), break even (NPV0), or to not meet any financial goal at the scale of the entire reserve (landscape) affected the predicted reduction of FT and the total area of LSF structure in different ways. With or without a requirement to break even, treatments accomplished about the same landscape level of FT reduction and LSF structure. Although treatment effects were similar, their associated net revenues ranged from negative $1 million to positive $3000 over 30 years. In contrast, a requirement for landscape treatments to earn money ($0.5 to $1.5 million NPV) over the same period had a negative effect on FT reduction and carried a cost in terms of both FT reduction and LSF structure. Results suggest that the spatial scale at which silvicultural treatments were evaluated was influential because the lowest cost to the reserve objectives was accomplished by a mix of treatments that earned or lost money at the stand level but that collectively broke even at the landscape scale. Results also indicate that the timeframe over which treatments were evaluated was important because if breaking even was required within each decade instead of cumulatively over all three, the cost in terms of FT reduction and LSF structure was similar to requiring landscape treatments to earn $0.5 million NPV.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationHummel, S.; Calkin, D.E. 2005. Costs of landscape silviculture for fire and habitat management. Forest ecology and management. 207(3): 385-404
KeywordsNorthwest Forest Plan, late-successional reserve, northern spored owl, simulated annealing, ecosystem management
- Modeling trade-offs between fire threat reduction and late-seral forest structure.
- Seeing the bigger picture: landscape silviculture may offer compatible solutions to conflicting objectives.
- Comprehensive comparative economic evaluation of woody biomass energy from silvicultural fuel treatments
XML: View XML