Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Brent E. Ewers; Ram Oren
    Date: 2000
    Source: Tree Physiology, 20, 579-589, 2000 Heron Publishing
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: View PDF  (344 KB)

    Description

    We analyzed assumptions and measurement errors in estimating canopy transpiration (EL) from sap flux (JS) measured with Granier-type sensors, and in calculating canopy stomata1 conductance (GS) from EL and vapor pressure deficit (D). The study was performed in l2-year-old Pinus taeda L. stands with a wide range in leaf area index (L) and growth rate. No systematic differences in JS were found between the north and south sides of trees. However, JS in xylem between 20 and 40 mm from the cambium was 50 and 39% of JS in the outer 20-mm band of xylem in slow- and fast-growing trees, respectively. Sap flux measured in stems did not lag JS measured in branches, and time and frequency domain analyses of time series indicated that variability in JS in stems and branches is mostly explained by variation in D. Therefore, JS was used to estimate transpiration, after accounting for radial patterns. There was no difference between D and leaf-to-air vapor pressure gradient, and D did not have a vertical profile in stands of either low or high L suggesting a strong canopy-atmosphere coupling. Therefore, D estimated at one point in the canopy can be used to calculate GS in such stands. Given the uncertainties in JS, relative humidity, and temperature measurements, to keep errors in GS estimates to less than 10%, estimates of GS should be limited to conditions in which D 2 0.6 kPa.

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

    Citation

    Ewers, Brent E.; Oren, Ram. 2000. Analyses of Assumptions and Erros in the Calculation of Stomatal Conductance from Sap Flux Measurements. Tree Physiology, 20, 579-589, 2000 Heron Publishing

    Related Search


    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page
https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/2046