Skip to Main Content
Legal distinction between employee and independent contractor as applied to collective bargaining activities in timber harvestingAuthor(s): James E. Granskog; William C. Siegal
Source: Forest Products Journal Vol. 28(9): 16-20
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (484 KB)
DescriptionCollective bargaining attempts by timber harvesting labor groups is often complicated by lack of a clear legal distinction between "employees" and "independent contractors." the primary criterion to make the distinction - the "right-to-control" test of common law - has now been amplified by a number of secondary tests, including: 1) the right to discharge; 2) the degree of skill required by the worker; 3) permanency or length of service; 4) ownership or extent of personal investment in equipment and facilities; 5) opportunities for profit or loss; and 6) method of payment (by time or by job). Several other guidlines also exist, including the question of ownership of stumpage, a factor peculiar to timber harvesting cases.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationGranskog, James E.; Siegal, William C. 1977. Legal distinction between employee and independent contractor as applied to collective bargaining activities in timber harvesting. Forest Products Journal Vol. 28(9): 16-20
- Public and Private Forest Disturbance Regimes in the Southern Appalachians
- Private Forests: Management and Policy in a Market Economy
- Simulating restoration strategies for a southern boreal forest landscape with complex land ownership patterns
XML: View XML