Skip to Main Content
U.S. Forest Service
Caring for the land and serving people

United States Department of Agriculture

Home > Search > Publication Information

  1. Share via EmailShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on Twitter
    Dislike this pubLike this pub
    Author(s): Alan J. Lewitus; Bonnie M. Willis; Kenneth C. Hayes; JoAnn M. Burkholder; Howard B. Gasgow; Patricia M. Gilbert
    Date: 1999
    Source: J. Phycol. 35, 1430-1437 (1999)
    Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
    PDF: Download Publication  (805.0 KB)


    The nutritional versatility of dinoflagellates is a complicating factor in identifying potential links between nutrient eurichment and the proliferation of harmful algal bloom. For exmaple, although dinoflagellates associated with hamful algal blooms (e.g. red tides) are generally considered to be phototrophic and we inorganic nutrients such as nitrate or phosphate, many of these species also have pronounced heterotrophic capabilities either as osmorophs or phagotrophs. Recently, the widespread occurrence of the heterotmpbic toxic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscidia Steidinger et Burkholder, has been documented in turbid estuarine waters. Pfiesteria piscidia has a relatively proficient gmziug ability, but also has an ability to function as a phototroph by acquiring chloroplasts from algal prey, a process termed kleptoplastidy. We tested the abilily df kleptoplastidic P. piscicida to take up 15N-labled NH+4, NO-3, urea, or glutamate. The photosynthetic activity of these cultures was verified,inpart by use of the fluorochrome, primulin which indicated a positive relationship between photosynthetic starch production and growth irradiance. All four N substrates were taken up by P. piscicido, and the highest uptake rates were in the range cited for phytoplankton aad were similar, to N uptake estimate for phototrophic P. piscicido. The demonstration of direct nutrient acquisition by kleptoplastidic P. piscicido suggests that the response of the dinoflagellate to nutrient enrichment complex, and that the specified pathway of nutrient stimulation (e.g. indirect stimulation through enhancement of phytoplankton prey abundance vs. direct stimulation by saprotrophic nutrient uptake) may depend on P. piscicida's nutrient state (phagotrophy vs. phototrophy).

    Publication Notes

    • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication.
    • (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
    • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
    • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.


    Lewitus, Alan J.; Willis, Bonnie M.; Hayes, Kenneth C.; Burkholder, JoAnn M.; Gasgow, Howard B., Jr.; Gilbert, Patricia M.; Burke, Marianne K. 1999. Mixotrophy and Nitrogen Uptake by Pfiesteria Piscicida (Dinophyceae). J. Phycol. 35, 1430-1437 (1999)

    Related Search

    XML: View XML
Show More
Show Fewer
Jump to Top of Page