Skip to Main Content
Tree grades, yields and values for some Appalachian hardwoodsAuthor(s): Robert A. Campbell
Source: Research Paper SE-09. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 29 p.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Station: Southeastern Forest Experiment Station
PDF: View PDF (3.85 MB)
DescriptionForesters ahve long recognized the need for a better method of appraising standing timber in terms of quality as well as volume of lumber that trees may be expected to produce. Because the range in price between high-grade lumber and low-grade lumber is extremely wide, a stand of high-quality timber is much more valuable than a low-quality stand. In spite of this, estimating methods commonly used today give little consideration to quality
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationCampbell, Robert A. 1951. Tree grades, yields and values for some Appalachian hardwoods. Research Paper SE-09. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. 29 p.
- Development of Grading Systems for Short-Length Lumber
- Four test-demonstrations of hardwood log grades in the Northeast
- Reconsidering price projections for selected grades of Douglas-fir, coast hem-fir, inland hem-fir, and ponderosa pine lumber.
XML: View XML