Skip to Main Content
A comparison of two waterfowl brood survey techniquesAuthor(s): Mark A. Rumble; Lester D. Flake
Source: Journal of wildlife management. 46(4): 1048-1053
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
PDF: View PDF (159 KB)
DescriptionAerial surveys, brood beat outs, road surveys, and brood observations have been used to estimate numbers of waterfowl broods (M. E. Anderson, unpubl. reps., South Dakota Dep. Game, Fish, and Parks Fed. Aid Proj. W-17-R-7 and 8,1953, 1955; Bennett 1967). M. C. Hammond (unpubl. rep., U.S. Bur. Sport Fish and Wildl., 1970) summarized several brood survey techniques and suggested that combining 2 or more techniques might be desirable for increased accuracy in some detailed waterfowl studies. The objective of this study was to compare 2 techniques, flush counts and hidden observation counts, for censusing duck broods on livestock watering ponds (stock ponds).
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationRumble, Mark A.; Flake, Lester D. 1982. A comparison of two waterfowl brood survey techniques. Journal of wildlife management. 46(4): 1048-1053
Keywordsaerial surveys, waterfowl, broods
- Comparison of day snorkeling, night snorkeling, and electrofishing to estimate bull trout abundance and size structure in a second-order Idaho stream
- Brook trout movement during and after recolonization of a naturally defaunated stream reach
- Dynamics of chinook salmon populations within Idaho's Frank Church Wilderness: implications for persistence
XML: View XML