Skip to Main Content
Assessing the accuracy of wildland fire situation analysis (WFSA) fire size and suppression cost estimates.Author(s): Geoffrey H. Donovan; Peter Noordijk
Source: Journal of Forestry. January/February: 10-13
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
PDF: View PDF (214 KB)
DescriptionTo determine the optimal suppression strategy for escaped wildfires, federal land managers are requiredto conduct a wildland fire situation analysis (WFSA). As part of the WFSA process, fire managers estimate final fire size and suppression costs. Estimates from 58 WFSAs conducted during the 2002 fire season are compared to actual outcomes. Results indicate that estimates of fire size and suppression costs are systematically biased. Modifications to the WFSA process are suggested to address these problems.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication.
- (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
CitationDonovan, Geoffrey H.; Noordijk, Peter. 2005. Assessing the accuracy of wildland fire situation analysis (WFSA) fire size and suppression cost estimates. Journal of Forestry. January/February: 10-13
KeywordsWFSA, wildfire, economics, suppression, probability
- Economic cost of initial attack and large-fire suppression
- Allowing a wildfire to burn: estimating the effect on future fire suppression costs
- Prediction errors in wildland fire situation analyses.
XML: View XML